that's because they're lossless live recordings instead of lossylowlight79 wrote:The bootlegs sounds like they have more air to breath IMHO. Ed sounds more up front and you can definitely hear the venue's take on the bootleg.
2005 Shows Rereleased in FLAC
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: 2005 Shows Rereleased in FLAC
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: 2005 Shows Rereleased in FLAC
I looked at a bunch of these shows...is there enough here to create another Cinderellas?
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42760
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
- lowlight79
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2080
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:04 pm
- Location: Heathrow, FL
Re: 2005 Shows Rereleased in FLAC
Where in 2005, Corin Tucker singing RITFW was truly terrifying. In 2015, it just makes you want to drive off the road if stuck in Traffic.
- matt reeder
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1509
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:34 pm
Re: 2005 Shows Rereleased in FLAC
I could listen to Corin Tucker sing the phone book and enjoy the hell out of it.lowlight79 wrote:Where in 2005, Corin Tucker singing RITFW was truly terrifying. In 2015, it just makes you want to drive off the road if stuck in Traffic.
-
InThePresentTense
- Banned from the Pit
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Wed January 07, 2015 9:09 am
Re: 2005 Shows Rereleased in FLAC
I still need these to complete the collection and I am done. One day maybe
2005-09-20, Quebec City
2005-09-24, St. Johns
2005-09-25, St. Johns
2005-11-22, Santiago
2005-11-25, Buenos Aires
2005-11-26, Buenos Aires
2005-11-28, Porto Alegre
2005-11-30, Curitiba
2005-12-02, Sao Paulo
2005-12-03, Sao Paulo
2005-12-04, Rio De Janeiro
2005-09-20, Quebec City
2005-09-24, St. Johns
2005-09-25, St. Johns
2005-11-22, Santiago
2005-11-25, Buenos Aires
2005-11-26, Buenos Aires
2005-11-28, Porto Alegre
2005-11-30, Curitiba
2005-12-02, Sao Paulo
2005-12-03, Sao Paulo
2005-12-04, Rio De Janeiro
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16263
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: 2005 Shows Rereleased in FLAC
I appreciate that whoever is doing the tagging of the 2005 files is coming very close to my own file naming conventions, eg. 'State of Love and Trust' not 'State Of Love And Trust' and lowercase lettering for the encore breaks - though I encase them in brackets, eg. '(encore break 1)'.
I still rename every 'Elderly Woman Behind the Counter in a Small Town' to simply 'Small Town' (that's what I've used for years and I'm not going to change it now) and alter every album title to: year.month.day City, Country (or state abbreviation when in the USA).
I still rename every 'Elderly Woman Behind the Counter in a Small Town' to simply 'Small Town' (that's what I've used for years and I'm not going to change it now) and alter every album title to: year.month.day City, Country (or state abbreviation when in the USA).
- CopperTom
- Champion of RM
- Posts: 10759
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
- Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Re: 2005 Shows Rereleased in FLAC
ETree naming standard or gtfo.
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
- AndySlash
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2568
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:42 am
- Location: Minneapolis
Re: 2005 Shows Rereleased in FLAC
Despite it being wrong, one of my naming quirks is having to rename Better Man as Betterman for every show I copy/download. The 2003 bootlegs used the one word title, and I've stubbornly stuck with that ever since.
ah, copperplate, a font for the truly modern man.
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16263
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: 2005 Shows Rereleased in FLAC
Ha, that's one of my pet peeves! I always rename it to "Better Man".
I'll admit I'm the same with RVM, however. I think the correct title is "Rearview Mirror" but, for the sake of consistency, I've always stuck with "Rearviewmirror".
I'll admit I'm the same with RVM, however. I think the correct title is "Rearview Mirror" but, for the sake of consistency, I've always stuck with "Rearviewmirror".
- Sgt. Crackpot
- F.U.B.A.R
- Posts: 9104
- Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
- Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
- Location: Lft Craquepeau
- Contact:
Re: 2005 Shows Rereleased in FLAC
It actually is rearviewmirror on the rear of vs.Birds in Hell wrote:Ha, that's one of my pet peeves! I always rename it to "Better Man".
I'll admit I'm the same with RVM, however. I think the correct title is "Rearview Mirror" but, for the sake of consistency, I've always stuck with "Rearviewmirror".
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16263
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: 2005 Shows Rereleased in FLAC
Wow, you're right!Sgt. Crackpot wrote:It actually is rearviewmirror on the rear of vs.Birds in Hell wrote:Ha, that's one of my pet peeves! I always rename it to "Better Man".
I'll admit I'm the same with RVM, however. I think the correct title is "Rearview Mirror" but, for the sake of consistency, I've always stuck with "Rearviewmirror".
What a relief.
- Sgt. Crackpot
- F.U.B.A.R
- Posts: 9104
- Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
- Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
- Location: Lft Craquepeau
- Contact:
Re: 2005 Shows Rereleased in FLAC
Birds in Hell wrote:Wow, you're right!Sgt. Crackpot wrote:It actually is rearviewmirror on the rear of vs.Birds in Hell wrote:Ha, that's one of my pet peeves! I always rename it to "Better Man".
I'll admit I'm the same with RVM, however. I think the correct title is "Rearview Mirror" but, for the sake of consistency, I've always stuck with "Rearviewmirror".
What a relief.
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour
-
InThePresentTense
- Banned from the Pit
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Wed January 07, 2015 9:09 am
Re: 2005 Shows Rereleased in FLAC
Naming conventions be damned. I stick with the official name of the songs accept with Elderly Woman........... I call that Small Town. yyyy-mm-dd, City and then each disc in sub-folder called Disc 1, Disc 2 and then Discnumber-tracknumber - Song title.
It works for me. No one I have ever traded with has complained but I know there is a diverse view on naming conventions so I wouldn't take it personally anyways. Different things work for different people.
It works for me. No one I have ever traded with has complained but I know there is a diverse view on naming conventions so I wouldn't take it personally anyways. Different things work for different people.
- lowlight79
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2080
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:04 pm
- Location: Heathrow, FL
Re: 2005 Shows Rereleased in FLAC
"Encore Break 1"Birds in Hell wrote:I appreciate that whoever is doing the tagging of the 2005 files is coming very close to my own file naming conventions, eg. 'State of Love and Trust' not 'State Of Love And Trust' and lowercase lettering for the encore breaks - though I encase them in brackets, eg. '(encore break 1)'.
I still rename every 'Elderly Woman Behind the Counter in a Small Town' to simply 'Small Town' (that's what I've used for years and I'm not going to change it now) and alter every album title to: year.month.day City, Country (or state abbreviation when in the USA).
That's how I label spenno!
Ok, so I listened to toronto today as I prepare to put this canadian mix project together. 26 year old lowlight79 thought bonobos on RITFW was awesome, 36 year old lowlight79, no so much. On to Edmonton!
- ridleybradout
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2551
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:33 pm
- Location: Rand McNally
Re: 2005 Shows Rereleased in FLAC
Same here. Hehe, Bonoboslowlight79 wrote: Ok, so I listened to toronto today as I prepare to put this canadian mix project together. 26 year old lowlight79 thought bonobos on RITFW was awesome, 36 year old lowlight79, no so much.
-
coffeecup
- Banned from the Pit
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 12:05 pm
Re: 2005 Shows Rereleased in FLAC
The thing I can't understand is how are the live recordings still being released with sector boundry errors for burning to cd. If people that play with recordings for a hobby can do it right, there is not much excuse for proffessionals not to.
-
InThePresentTense
- Banned from the Pit
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Wed January 07, 2015 9:09 am
Re: 2005 Shows Rereleased in FLAC
It is quite sad. So simple to address but that's the digital world for ya nowadays. To be for clean sources for cd burning/ripping is antiquated to the majority it seems. I spent years just learning the basics of this stuff and it makes a world of difference. It's like quality is no longer that important. I am a novice and even I scratch my head at what is being released.coffeecup wrote:The thing I can't understand is how are the live recordings still being released with sector boundry errors for burning to cd. If people that play with recordings for a hobby can do it right, there is not much excuse for proffessionals not to.
- lowlight79
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2080
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:04 pm
- Location: Heathrow, FL
Re: 2005 Shows Rereleased in FLAC
Sector boundaries errors are like assholes, everyone has one
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51786
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: 2005 Shows Rereleased in FLAC
Some have two, amirite dimejinkey?lowlight79 wrote:Sector boundaries errors are like assholes, everyone has one
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG