Fantasy Football Discussion
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 48505
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
thank you, arod
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 48505
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
x2lennytheweedwhacker wrote:thank you, arod
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
Te: Chandler or Kelce?
Pick 2 flex:
Rawls (tough matchup but a lot of touches)
Evans (drop issues, but a lot of targets/high ceiling)
Langford (great matchup, but splitting with forte)
C. West (similar situation as Langford)
Pick 2 flex:
Rawls (tough matchup but a lot of touches)
Evans (drop issues, but a lot of targets/high ceiling)
Langford (great matchup, but splitting with forte)
C. West (similar situation as Langford)
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 48505
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
rawls and evans i guessKaius wrote:Te: Chandler or Kelce?
Pick 2 flex:
Rawls (tough matchup but a lot of touches)
Evans (drop issues, but a lot of targets/high ceiling)
Langford (great matchup, but splitting with forte)
C. West (similar situation as Langford)
kelce i guess
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
Yeah I don't feel great about the choices I have to make either. I think they're all solid plays, but I'm playing a top team this week and I need to win these last 2 games to get into the playoffs.
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 48505
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
chandler may do fine, but since you have another great option in kelce if it were me i'd wait to see what chandler does in a starting role...i think he'll be solid if nothing else thoughKaius wrote:Yeah I don't feel great about the choices I have to make either. I think they're all solid plays, but I'm playing a top team this week and I need to win these last 2 games to get into the playoffs.
i think i'd have langford number 4 on that list, while considering west instead of evans...like you, i think rawls will get the most opportunities
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
I appreciate your time.
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 48505
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
anything for you, broKaius wrote:I appreciate your time.
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85154
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
RawlsKaius wrote:Te: Chandler or Kelce?
Pick 2 flex:
Rawls (tough matchup but a lot of touches)
Evans (drop issues, but a lot of targets/high ceiling)
Langford (great matchup, but splitting with forte)
C. West (similar situation as Langford)
West
Evans
Langford
And absolutely go Kelce. This could be his biggest game of the year. Oakland seems to fucking hate defending TE's and Alex Smith loves the fuck out of feeding them.
But I'm running with Chandler this week because I don't have any other options. I don't expect him to replace Gronk or anything but I do expect end zone targets/opportunities. In my other league, I'm going Kelce all the way.
-
nyquillyn
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5825
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
Kelce vs. Chandler is tough, most are picking Kelce, but I'd probably pick Chandler. Alex Smith only has 12 TD passes.
Then Rawls and Evans.
Then Rawls and Evans.
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
My gut says Chandler, but only because Tom Brady. Also, my opponent has Brady.
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
Please post your respective fantasy records so I know who to trust. 
-
nyquillyn
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5825
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
0-0 with 0 total points
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
How many thousands have you won on FanDuel?
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 48505
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
the vikings d are getting destroyed but thanks to special teams scoring they have 55 points for me right now...i'm going off in that league right now, and it pisses me completely off knowing i had bell and dion lewis
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
55?! My league gives credit for return td's also, and MN has 3.
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 48505
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
3 sounds really low if they credit td'sKaius wrote:55?! My league gives credit for return td's also, and MN has 3.
but yeah this league has really elevated scoring...extra points for rushes, receptions, returns for certain lengths...i know the kickoff return was 101 yards but not exactly sure how many points i got for it
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
If the defense gives up 35+ pts they're going to be in the negative unless they get sacks, picks, etc.
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 48505
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
i just looked at the scoring settings and i can't figure out how they have 58 now, looks more like it should be around 30, but whatevsKaius wrote:If the defense gives up 35+ pts they're going to be in the negative unless they get sacks, picks, etc.
i should get -1 based on seattle's scoring
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
In other news, I started Langford over west and Evans. Whoops. That last Kadeem Carey TD should have been Langfords but whatever.