Fantasy Football Discussion

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 48505
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

thank you, arod
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 48505
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:thank you, arod
x2
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Kaius »

Te: Chandler or Kelce?

Pick 2 flex:
Rawls (tough matchup but a lot of touches)
Evans (drop issues, but a lot of targets/high ceiling)
Langford (great matchup, but splitting with forte)
C. West (similar situation as Langford)
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 48505
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

Kaius wrote:Te: Chandler or Kelce?

Pick 2 flex:
Rawls (tough matchup but a lot of touches)
Evans (drop issues, but a lot of targets/high ceiling)
Langford (great matchup, but splitting with forte)
C. West (similar situation as Langford)
rawls and evans i guess

kelce i guess
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Kaius »

Yeah I don't feel great about the choices I have to make either. I think they're all solid plays, but I'm playing a top team this week and I need to win these last 2 games to get into the playoffs.
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 48505
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

Kaius wrote:Yeah I don't feel great about the choices I have to make either. I think they're all solid plays, but I'm playing a top team this week and I need to win these last 2 games to get into the playoffs.
chandler may do fine, but since you have another great option in kelce if it were me i'd wait to see what chandler does in a starting role...i think he'll be solid if nothing else though

i think i'd have langford number 4 on that list, while considering west instead of evans...like you, i think rawls will get the most opportunities
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Kaius »

I appreciate your time.
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 48505
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

Kaius wrote:I appreciate your time.
anything for you, bro
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85154
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

Kaius wrote:Te: Chandler or Kelce?

Pick 2 flex:
Rawls (tough matchup but a lot of touches)
Evans (drop issues, but a lot of targets/high ceiling)
Langford (great matchup, but splitting with forte)
C. West (similar situation as Langford)
Rawls
West
Evans
Langford

And absolutely go Kelce. This could be his biggest game of the year. Oakland seems to fucking hate defending TE's and Alex Smith loves the fuck out of feeding them.

But I'm running with Chandler this week because I don't have any other options. I don't expect him to replace Gronk or anything but I do expect end zone targets/opportunities. In my other league, I'm going Kelce all the way.
nyquillyn
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5825
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by nyquillyn »

Kelce vs. Chandler is tough, most are picking Kelce, but I'd probably pick Chandler. Alex Smith only has 12 TD passes.

Then Rawls and Evans.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Kaius »

My gut says Chandler, but only because Tom Brady. Also, my opponent has Brady.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Kaius »

Please post your respective fantasy records so I know who to trust. :)
nyquillyn
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5825
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by nyquillyn »

0-0 with 0 total points
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Kaius »

How many thousands have you won on FanDuel?
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 48505
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

the vikings d are getting destroyed but thanks to special teams scoring they have 55 points for me right now...i'm going off in that league right now, and it pisses me completely off knowing i had bell and dion lewis
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Kaius »

55?! My league gives credit for return td's also, and MN has 3.
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 48505
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

Kaius wrote:55?! My league gives credit for return td's also, and MN has 3.
3 sounds really low if they credit td's

but yeah this league has really elevated scoring...extra points for rushes, receptions, returns for certain lengths...i know the kickoff return was 101 yards but not exactly sure how many points i got for it
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Kaius »

If the defense gives up 35+ pts they're going to be in the negative unless they get sacks, picks, etc.
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 48505
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

Kaius wrote:If the defense gives up 35+ pts they're going to be in the negative unless they get sacks, picks, etc.
i just looked at the scoring settings and i can't figure out how they have 58 now, looks more like it should be around 30, but whatevs

i should get -1 based on seattle's scoring
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Kaius »

In other news, I started Langford over west and Evans. Whoops. That last Kadeem Carey TD should have been Langfords but whatever.
Post Reply