Boston Red Sox Thread
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
i like iglesias right now and think he and middlebrooks and/or drew could platoon.
they should deal salty for whatever they can get. that's not to say they need to make a big splash, they just need to turnover his roster spot b/c he doesn't add much to this team.
they should deal salty for whatever they can get. that's not to say they need to make a big splash, they just need to turnover his roster spot b/c he doesn't add much to this team.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
If you trade Salty and Ross gets hurt all you have is Lavarnway. I'm not against trading Salty but you need to bring in a major league quality backup through if you get rid of Salty.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I wouldn't give up Iglesias.numbers wrote:Absolutely. I'm not suggesting they trade any top prospects, but if you could get either of those things for a mid-level prospect, or someone like Iglesias or Lavarnway, I'd do it.cutuphalfdead wrote:For sure, but I still wouldn't give up anything substantial and mortgage the future.numbers wrote:If the pick up a 3rd starter and a Left Fielder they have as good a chance as anyone else.MattA75 wrote:the problem they have is that they probably aren't good enough to go all the way, they shouldn't give up any of their top prospects, and the best way for them to get better is to pull a Dodgers and get themselves right back in trouble budgetwiseelliseamos wrote:plenty of time to screw this up. cherington needs to get aggressive to send a message that they're not complacent where they're at. who are possibly available pitchers (RP & SP)? eric gagne? bobby jenks maybe?MattA75 wrote:amazing considering Ellsbury has sucked all year...I thought they'd be better than most people, but if this is where they were gonna be, I'd have thought Ellsbury was doing 2011 all over againCoach wrote:Pinch me. It's almost June and here we are....
American League
EAST W L
Boston 32 22
NY Yankees 30 22
Baltimore 29 24
Tampa Bay 28 24
Toronto 23 30
they'll make a minor move or two, but I don't see them making a big splash
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
.919 OPS the last month. That'll make up for a slow start!MattA75 wrote:Good luck with thatphilpritchard wrote:Not well. He's still got roughly 11 months to make up for a rough few weeks.MattA75 wrote:How's that Melky Cabrera deal working out?philpritchard wrote:Well I'm glad to hear the only reason Boston is so good this year is because they're a bunch of cheaters!
-
MattA75
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
until he gets popped for PEDs again...philpritchard wrote:.919 OPS the last month. That'll make up for a slow start!MattA75 wrote:Good luck with thatphilpritchard wrote:Not well. He's still got roughly 11 months to make up for a rough few weeks.MattA75 wrote:How's that Melky Cabrera deal working out?philpritchard wrote:Well I'm glad to hear the only reason Boston is so good this year is because they're a bunch of cheaters!
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I would actually be curious to know if there's some kind of clause in his contract that voids it if he's caught. I don't remember hearing anything about that.MattA75 wrote:until he gets popped for PEDs again...philpritchard wrote:.919 OPS the last month. That'll make up for a slow start!MattA75 wrote:Good luck with thatphilpritchard wrote:Not well. He's still got roughly 11 months to make up for a rough few weeks.MattA75 wrote:How's that Melky Cabrera deal working out?philpritchard wrote:Well I'm glad to hear the only reason Boston is so good this year is because they're a bunch of cheaters!
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
If I could get a powerhitting LF or a decent 3rd starter for him and 1 or 2 other midlevel prospects, I would. The presence of Boogarts makes Iglesias somewhat expendable.cutuphalfdead wrote:I wouldn't give up Iglesias.numbers wrote:Absolutely. I'm not suggesting they trade any top prospects, but if you could get either of those things for a mid-level prospect, or someone like Iglesias or Lavarnway, I'd do it.cutuphalfdead wrote:For sure, but I still wouldn't give up anything substantial and mortgage the future.numbers wrote:If the pick up a 3rd starter and a Left Fielder they have as good a chance as anyone else.MattA75 wrote:the problem they have is that they probably aren't good enough to go all the way, they shouldn't give up any of their top prospects, and the best way for them to get better is to pull a Dodgers and get themselves right back in trouble budgetwiseelliseamos wrote:plenty of time to screw this up. cherington needs to get aggressive to send a message that they're not complacent where they're at. who are possibly available pitchers (RP & SP)? eric gagne? bobby jenks maybe?MattA75 wrote:amazing considering Ellsbury has sucked all year...I thought they'd be better than most people, but if this is where they were gonna be, I'd have thought Ellsbury was doing 2011 all over againCoach wrote:Pinch me. It's almost June and here we are....
American League
EAST W L
Boston 32 22
NY Yankees 30 22
Baltimore 29 24
Tampa Bay 28 24
Toronto 23 30
they'll make a minor move or two, but I don't see them making a big splash
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
When is Bogarts projected to be major league ready?numbers wrote:If I could get a powerhitting LF or a decent 3rd starter for him and 1 or 2 other midlevel prospects, I would. The presence of Boogarts makes Iglesias somewhat expendable.cutuphalfdead wrote:I wouldn't give up Iglesias.numbers wrote:Absolutely. I'm not suggesting they trade any top prospects, but if you could get either of those things for a mid-level prospect, or someone like Iglesias or Lavarnway, I'd do it.cutuphalfdead wrote:For sure, but I still wouldn't give up anything substantial and mortgage the future.numbers wrote:If the pick up a 3rd starter and a Left Fielder they have as good a chance as anyone else.MattA75 wrote:the problem they have is that they probably aren't good enough to go all the way, they shouldn't give up any of their top prospects, and the best way for them to get better is to pull a Dodgers and get themselves right back in trouble budgetwiseelliseamos wrote:plenty of time to screw this up. cherington needs to get aggressive to send a message that they're not complacent where they're at. who are possibly available pitchers (RP & SP)? eric gagne? bobby jenks maybe?MattA75 wrote:amazing considering Ellsbury has sucked all year...I thought they'd be better than most people, but if this is where they were gonna be, I'd have thought Ellsbury was doing 2011 all over againCoach wrote:Pinch me. It's almost June and here we are....
American League
EAST W L
Boston 32 22
NY Yankees 30 22
Baltimore 29 24
Tampa Bay 28 24
Toronto 23 30
they'll make a minor move or two, but I don't see them making a big splash
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
it sounds like they want to move him to Pawtucket (from Portland). So if thats the case, with Iglesias playing some amazing d at third. I say trade salty, move middlebrooks to 1st when Ross needs a day off and have Napoli catch. That's what I meant by salty being a waste of a roster spot, bc the drop-off in d from he to Napoli can't be much, but the production with the bat is already a wide margin.cutuphalfdead wrote:When is Bogarts projected to be major league ready?numbers wrote:If I could get a powerhitting LF or a decent 3rd starter for him and 1 or 2 other midlevel prospects, I would. The presence of Boogarts makes Iglesias somewhat expendable.cutuphalfdead wrote:I wouldn't give up Iglesias.numbers wrote:Absolutely. I'm not suggesting they trade any top prospects, but if you could get either of those things for a mid-level prospect, or someone like Iglesias or Lavarnway, I'd do it.cutuphalfdead wrote:For sure, but I still wouldn't give up anything substantial and mortgage the future.numbers wrote:If the pick up a 3rd starter and a Left Fielder they have as good a chance as anyone else.MattA75 wrote:the problem they have is that they probably aren't good enough to go all the way, they shouldn't give up any of their top prospects, and the best way for them to get better is to pull a Dodgers and get themselves right back in trouble budgetwiseelliseamos wrote:plenty of time to screw this up. cherington needs to get aggressive to send a message that they're not complacent where they're at. who are possibly available pitchers (RP & SP)? eric gagne? bobby jenks maybe?MattA75 wrote:amazing considering Ellsbury has sucked all year...I thought they'd be better than most people, but if this is where they were gonna be, I'd have thought Ellsbury was doing 2011 all over againCoach wrote:Pinch me. It's almost June and here we are....
American League
EAST W L
Boston 32 22
NY Yankees 30 22
Baltimore 29 24
Tampa Bay 28 24
Toronto 23 30
they'll make a minor move or two, but I don't see them making a big splash
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I don't think Napoli is going to catch again for fear it will accelerate his hip issue.
If boogarts progresses as he has thus far, he should be in the majors by next season
If boogarts progresses as he has thus far, he should be in the majors by next season
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Thisnumbers wrote:I don't think Napoli is going to catch again for fear it will accelerate his hip issue.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
So I finally got to watch my first game of the season. Boy, I picked a good one to watch. 
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
It's enjoyable to watch the Sox these days. Every time Nap is up I feel like a home run is coming.
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
even if it's once a week?cutuphalfdead wrote:Thisnumbers wrote:I don't think Napoli is going to catch again for fear it will accelerate his hip issue.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Big Papi going deep at Jankee Stadium is one of the best things in sports.
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
There are only three Sox players hitting above .300 right now: Iglesias, Papi, Pedroia. And Iglesias has only 53 at bats.
Meanwhile....
Buchholz 8-0, 1.62 ERA
Lester 6-2, 3.53 ERA
Lackey 3-5, 2.96 ERA
No time to get into the bullpen, but clearly pitching has got to be the surprising bright spot here.
Meanwhile....
Buchholz 8-0, 1.62 ERA
Lester 6-2, 3.53 ERA
Lackey 3-5, 2.96 ERA
No time to get into the bullpen, but clearly pitching has got to be the surprising bright spot here.
-
MattA75
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Dempster's 2-6 too but I feel like he's pitched better than that (even with an era just shy of 4.5)Coach wrote:There are only three Sox players hitting above .300 right now: Iglesias, Papi, Pedroia. And Iglesias has only 53 at bats.
Meanwhile....
Buchholz 8-0, 1.62 ERA
Lester 6-2, 3.53 ERA
Lackey 3-5, 2.96 ERA
No time to get into the bullpen, but clearly pitching has got to be the surprising bright spot here.
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Yup, I only had a few minutes to gather some quick stats, but very true regarding Dempster.MattA75 wrote:Dempster's 2-6 too but I feel like he's pitched better than that (even with an era just shy of 4.5)Coach wrote:There are only three Sox players hitting above .300 right now: Iglesias, Papi, Pedroia. And Iglesias has only 53 at bats.
Meanwhile....
Buchholz 8-0, 1.62 ERA
Lester 6-2, 3.53 ERA
Lackey 3-5, 2.96 ERA
No time to get into the bullpen, but clearly pitching has got to be the surprising bright spot here.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Dempster has been very good, he hasnt gotten much run support and one or two bad outings have ballooned his numbers.
