Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46251
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
isn't most iconography nostalgic?
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BurtReynolds wrote:isn't most iconography nostalgic?
- Spoiler: show
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46251
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
but yeah, its a shame that a movie with such iconic ship designs only inspired others to recreate those ships again and again, rather than be inspired to create new iconic designs. That's humanity for you.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- Chris_H_2
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15610
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
- Location: An office full of assholes
Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
guys, it was literally a 2-second heads up. not sure why this is a big deal.
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46251
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
how dare you.@SkitchP wrote:BurtReynolds wrote:isn't most iconography nostalgic?
- Spoiler: show
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Chris_H_2 wrote:guys, it was literally a 2-second heads up. not sure why this is a big deal.
Only to me!
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- Daniel Bryan
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Wed July 09, 2014 7:55 pm
Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I didn't really catch on to the Falcon line, and since its been pointed out here it doesn't bother me one bit. Its a cool-as-fuck moment and it got cheers in the cinema I was in.
I guarantee, if they'd not said anything and just had Rey/Finn run to the Falcon without any sort of clue/build up then people would complain. It wasn't even that big of a telegraphed moment. The scene was flying along at such a fast pace; Finn & Rey running towards the first ship, delivering the line, first ship exploding, Falcon reveal was about 6 seconds in total.
I guarantee, if they'd not said anything and just had Rey/Finn run to the Falcon without any sort of clue/build up then people would complain. It wasn't even that big of a telegraphed moment. The scene was flying along at such a fast pace; Finn & Rey running towards the first ship, delivering the line, first ship exploding, Falcon reveal was about 6 seconds in total.
- zeb
- $5 Donation Gets Custom Title
- Posts: 7234
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:43 am
Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Burt, this was a bad post.BurtReynolds wrote:but yeah, its a shame that a movie with such iconic ship designs only inspired others to recreate those ships again and again, rather than be inspired to create new iconic designs. That's humanity for you.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I love you guys pointing to cheers of the crowd as proof of anything.
Generally people audibly cheering at movies are fools.
Generally people audibly cheering at movies are fools.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@SkitchP wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:BurtReynolds wrote:yeah.@SkitchP wrote:BurtReynolds wrote: Contrast that with Lando being Finn's father (which I don't think is a remotely true rumor btw). That would just be terrible.
and pretty racist, tbh
Anakin creating C3P0: Complete shit.
Rey and Finn stumbling upon The Falcon in an old junkyard/battlefield planet: not so crazy (given the setting)
Kylo being related to the Skywalkers: Completely fine.
Them stumbling on the Falcon there didn't bother me. It was the tipping of it ahead of time.
Tipping of it?
I don't follow
Before they see the shiny new ship, they say the whole "pile of junk" line about the offscreen falcon. At that moment it was obviously going to be the Falcon. Then the shiny new ship blows up and they reiterate the pile of junk line and then show the falcon. The first mention of it felt entirely gratuitous to me, and blew the reveal entirely. I knew from that moment the shiny new ship would not be an option and that they would turn and end up on the Falcon.
Interesting.
How else would you have it happen?
The rumour was Rey meets Han and Chewie digging around endless sand dunes looking for it and find it just in time to escape. Falcon is the first old character you meet in the film. Its reveal has to be great. Was for me.
Surely this way is better.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46251
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Its a little overly cynical, but bad? Come on!zeb wrote:Burt, this was a bad post.BurtReynolds wrote:but yeah, its a shame that a movie with such iconic ship designs only inspired others to recreate those ships again and again, rather than be inspired to create new iconic designs. That's humanity for you.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- Daniel Bryan
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Wed July 09, 2014 7:55 pm
Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I would tend to agree with that. My point is that if an entire room of people cheer at a small moment, I would be inclined to believe that something had been done well.@SkitchP wrote:I love you guys pointing to cheers of the crowd as proof of anything.
Generally people audibly cheering at movies are fools.
That tiny moment was a nice little setup for the Falcon
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nah, Burt's post was right on the money.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Your problems are with movie making devices failing.
Not with Star Wars devices. This was a pure Star Wars device in the discovery of the falcon. It worked perfectly in that light.
Not with Star Wars devices. This was a pure Star Wars device in the discovery of the falcon. It worked perfectly in that light.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The audience clapped and hooted at the end of my midnight showing of Phantom Menace.Daniel Bryan wrote:I would tend to agree with that. My point is that if an entire room of people cheer at a small moment, I would be inclined to believe that something had been done well.@SkitchP wrote:I love you guys pointing to cheers of the crowd as proof of anything.
Generally people audibly cheering at movies are fools.
That tiny moment was a nice little setup for the Falcon
(patriotic choking noises)
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)
@SkitchP wrote:Jurassic World was significantly worse than Jurassic Park 3: Look Out Run.
(patriotic choking noises)
- zeb
- $5 Donation Gets Custom Title
- Posts: 7234
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:43 am
Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There were clearly different ship designs between the prequels and the original trilogy. VII seems to be set about twenty years after VI, how much radical reimagining of ship design do you expect in that period?BurtReynolds wrote:Its a little overly cynical, but bad? Come on!zeb wrote:Burt, this was a bad post.BurtReynolds wrote:but yeah, its a shame that a movie with such iconic ship designs only inspired others to recreate those ships again and again, rather than be inspired to create new iconic designs. That's humanity for you.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The flashback sequence. Shot badly but it's here
http://s174.photobucket.com/user/dimeji ... 3.mp4.html
http://s174.photobucket.com/user/dimeji ... 3.mp4.html
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- zeb
- $5 Donation Gets Custom Title
- Posts: 7234
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:43 am
Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Of course they did. What else would you reasonably expect? It was the end of a midnight screening of a new Star Wars movie.McParadigm wrote:The audience clapped and hooted at the end of my midnight showing of Phantom Menace.
- Daniel Bryan
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Wed July 09, 2014 7:55 pm
Re: STAR WARS SPOILER THREAD. SPOILERS WITHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1999 was a strange year.McParadigm wrote:The audience clapped and hooted at the end of my midnight showing of Phantom Menace.Daniel Bryan wrote:I would tend to agree with that. My point is that if an entire room of people cheer at a small moment, I would be inclined to believe that something had been done well.@SkitchP wrote:I love you guys pointing to cheers of the crowd as proof of anything.
Generally people audibly cheering at movies are fools.
That tiny moment was a nice little setup for the Falcon
