Pearl Jam's first singles

General Pearl Jam discussion.
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Pearl Jam's first singles

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

Point is BS without 10
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Pearl Jam's first singles

Post by stip »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
nightmareblack0206 wrote:ARE YOU PEOPLE FKN NUTS FOR BASING YOUR OPINION WITHOUT 10?!
You're kind of missing the point of the thread.

Chud's right. When Ten came out no one knew who Pearl Jam was. The single did not get any immediate attention. The calculations involved would have been different from the ones made in subsequent albums. The single is not communicating with an established audience.
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Pearl Jam's first singles

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

So in late 92/early 93 when JEREMY, YL, ALIVE, EF were tearing up the charts, your telling me that is un equatable? Come on. ...

There wasn't a "established audience" in 1992-release of VS? LMFAO. ....THAT'S RICH

They had the biggest audience of fans during this time.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Pearl Jam's first singles

Post by stip »

nightmareblack0206 wrote:So in late 92/early 93 when JEREMY, YL, ALIVE, EF were tearing up the charts, your telling me that is un equatable? Come on. ...
I think you might be missing what this thread is going after. Singles as a first impression. Ten was a slow starter, without a built in audience. The inital singles didn't make much of an impression, and the subsequent singles aren't what this thread is about.
nightmareblack0206 wrote: There wasn't a "established audience" in 1992-release of VS? LMFAO. ....THAT'S RICH

They had the biggest audience of fans during this time.
Which is why I did include the vs. single
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Pearl Jam's first singles

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

I understand that you guys are leaving 10 out BUT let's do it this way. Let's USE 10 single just at the point when they became relevant. CANNOT EXCLUDE 10
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Pearl Jam's first singles

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

VS single wasn't released till late 93
NancyBabich
A Return To Form
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun January 20, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: Pearl Jam's first singles

Post by NancyBabich »

Who You Are hints that No Code will be more No Codeish than it actually is.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Pearl Jam's first singles

Post by McParadigm »

NancyBabich wrote:Who You Are hints that No Code will be more No Codeish than it actually is.
WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH 10
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9312
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Pearl Jam's first singles

Post by Kevin Davis »

stip wrote:Singles as a first impression.
Dave Grohl said his first impression of PJ after hearing "Alive" on the radio was that they sounded like a bunch of truckers.
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Pearl Jam's first singles

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

McParadigm wrote:
NancyBabich wrote:Who You Are hints that No Code will be more No Codeish than it actually is.
WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH 10
LMFAO
User avatar
Blenheim Augustine
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 674
Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 1:12 pm

Re: Pearl Jam's first singles

Post by Blenheim Augustine »

The Fixer is definitely indicative of how terrible that album is.
While a Western guitar motif lost on the swings drum bass fusion, get your own thoughts into the subconscious often forgotten. "Pendulum" is a sweeping soul from the ballast.
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Pearl Jam's first singles

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

Kevin Davis wrote:
stip wrote:Singles as a first impression.
Dave Grohl said his first impression of PJ after hearing "Alive" on the radio was that they sounded like a bunch of truckers.
You do know that Dave Grohl was the drummer for Nirvana right? A band which was candidly critical of PJ since day 1
User avatar
Blenheim Augustine
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 674
Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 1:12 pm

Re: Pearl Jam's first singles

Post by Blenheim Augustine »

nightmareblack0206 wrote:
Kevin Davis wrote:
stip wrote:Singles as a first impression.
Dave Grohl said his first impression of PJ after hearing "Alive" on the radio was that they sounded like a bunch of truckers.
You do know that Dave Grohl was the drummer for Nirvana right? A band which was candidly critical of PJ since day 1
Dave Grohl drummed for Nirvana?! :shock:
While a Western guitar motif lost on the swings drum bass fusion, get your own thoughts into the subconscious often forgotten. "Pendulum" is a sweeping soul from the ballast.
User avatar
mastaflatch
AnalLog
Posts: 1183
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:05 am

Re: Pearl Jam's first singles

Post by mastaflatch »

Blenheim Augustine wrote:
nightmareblack0206 wrote:
Kevin Davis wrote:
stip wrote:Singles as a first impression.
Dave Grohl said his first impression of PJ after hearing "Alive" on the radio was that they sounded like a bunch of truckers.
You do know that Dave Grohl was the drummer for Nirvana right? A band which was candidly critical of PJ since day 1
Dave Grohl drummed for Nirvana?! :shock:
and he was pretty good at it!
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: Pearl Jam's first singles

Post by Thejambi »

In most cases these are not the best songs on their respective albums, but are they indicative of those albums?
Regardless of lack of audience or expectations, doesn't Ten still fit the mold of this exercise? To answer this question, the album has to have been listened to in order to evaluate how the lead single represents that album. This really wasn't a first impressions thread...or was it?
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Pearl Jam's first singles

Post by @SkitchP »

in the coonlight.


just 'cause
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9312
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Pearl Jam's first singles

Post by Kevin Davis »

nightmareblack0206 wrote:You do know that Dave Grohl was the drummer for Nirvana right?
No, you must be thinking of someone else. Dave Grohl is the lead singer for Foo Fighters.

See:
Image
warehouse
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4993
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm

Re: Pearl Jam's first singles

Post by warehouse »

nightmareblack0206 wrote:
Kevin Davis wrote:
stip wrote:Singles as a first impression.
Dave Grohl said his first impression of PJ after hearing "Alive" on the radio was that they sounded like a bunch of truckers.
You do know that Dave Grohl was the drummer for Nirvana right? A band which was candidly critical of PJ since day 1
u know he played drums w pearl jam right?
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Pearl Jam's first singles

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

That he did.
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: Pearl Jam's first singles

Post by Coach »

Bump
Post Reply