McParadigm wrote:You left out the part where fans will invariably pick three to five mediocre pieces from the album to consider "diamonds in the rough," overstating any reverb'd pop affectation as "atmospheric" and praising any tepid rehash as "a nice twist on one of the band's stronger templates."
I could change a few words and this could apply to new star wars movie
Which words?
Album to movie
Reverb'd pop to Finn
Band's to franchise's
McParadigm wrote:You left out the part where fans will invariably pick three to five mediocre pieces from the album to consider "diamonds in the rough," overstating any reverb'd pop affectation as "atmospheric" and praising any tepid rehash as "a nice twist on one of the band's stronger templates."
I could change a few words and this could apply to new star wars movie
Which words?
The, and, as, I, to, in, on, suppository.
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour
McParadigm wrote:You left out the part where fans will invariably pick three to five mediocre pieces from the album to consider "diamonds in the rough," overstating any reverb'd pop affectation as "atmospheric" and praising any tepid rehash as "a nice twist on one of the band's stronger templates."
I could change a few words and this could apply to new star wars movie
I'd say they are basically the same, but Star Wars now aims to be prolific.
McParadigm wrote:You left out the part where fans will invariably pick three to five mediocre pieces from the album to consider "diamonds in the rough," overstating any reverb'd pop affectation as "atmospheric" and praising any tepid rehash as "a nice twist on one of the band's stronger templates."
lecherouslittlestump wrote:Why do people even care about a new Pearl Jam album? It'll be a mediocre-to-solid album that will contain some rockers and some ballads. Critics will call it a "return to form" but it'll be the same by the numbers album that we've been hearing since 06. Posters here will disect every bit of info from band interviews and convince themselves that we're "finally going to get the art space rock batshit insane experimental album" from them, and we'll truly believe that until we hear the single, which will be a 3-4 minute no nonsense punk rocker.
Am I wrong? The only reason you still listen to Pearl Jam is to desperately cling on to that time in the 90s where you were young and just partied and smoked weed all day. Well, it's 2016, you're grown ass men with jobs and kids and responsibilities. Why are you even listening to Pearl Jam? I mean, it's Pearl Jam, the Whitesnake of the 90s. Throw away the flannel, put the Doc Martens back in the cupboard, and grow up. Only by letting go of Pearl Jam can you ascend into the heavens which we call BEING A GROWN ASS ADULT
So we can have a dickhead make a fake track-listing with navy bean in it why else do u expect
lecherouslittlestump wrote:Why do people even care about a new Pearl Jam album? It'll be a mediocre-to-solid album that will contain some rockers and some ballads. Critics will call it a "return to form" but it'll be the same by the numbers album that we've been hearing since 06. Posters here will disect every bit of info from band interviews and convince themselves that we're "finally going to get the art space rock batshit insane experimental album" from them, and we'll truly believe that until we hear the single, which will be a 3-4 minute no nonsense punk rocker.
Am I wrong? The only reason you still listen to Pearl Jam is to desperately cling on to that time in the 90s where you were young and just partied and smoked weed all day. Well, it's 2016, you're grown ass men with jobs and kids and responsibilities. Why are you even listening to Pearl Jam? I mean, it's Pearl Jam, the Whitesnake of the 90s. Throw away the flannel, put the Doc Martens back in the cupboard, and grow up. Only by letting go of Pearl Jam can you ascend into the heavens which we call BEING A GROWN ASS ADULT
lecherouslittlestump wrote:Why do people even care about a new Pearl Jam album? It'll be a mediocre-to-solid album that will contain some rockers and some ballads. Critics will call it a "return to form" but it'll be the same by the numbers album that we've been hearing since 06. Posters here will disect every bit of info from band interviews and convince themselves that we're "finally going to get the art space rock batshit insane experimental album" from them, and we'll truly believe that until we hear the single, which will be a 3-4 minute no nonsense punk rocker.
Am I wrong? The only reason you still listen to Pearl Jam is to desperately cling on to that time in the 90s where you were young and just partied and smoked weed all day. Well, it's 2016, you're grown ass men with jobs and kids and responsibilities. Why are you even listening to Pearl Jam? I mean, it's Pearl Jam, the Whitesnake of the 90s. Throw away the flannel, put the Doc Martens back in the cupboard, and grow up. Only by letting go of Pearl Jam can you ascend into the heavens which we call BEING A GROWN ASS ADULT
McParadigm wrote:You left out the part where fans will invariably pick three to five mediocre pieces from the album to consider "diamonds in the rough," overstating any reverb'd pop affectation as "atmospheric" and praising any tepid rehash as "a nice twist on one of the band's stronger templates."
if you make that 8 to 10 instead of 3 to 5 you basically have the outline of the bands' press release for #11
I know I'm sounding pessimistic here, but I was not even believing in a small chance of it happening. They're too old, slow, and unmotivated these days. Well get some reissues and perhaps another B sides or the like, before anything new is made.
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour
tragabigzanda wrote:I listen to S/T a LOT, because
A) I can only listen to CDs on the canyon drive from Big Sky to Bozeman;
B) I sold almost every non-PJ CD I owned a few years ago;
C) I never bought a PJ CD after S/T, and
D) all the older PJ CDs have scratches on them.
So as I say, S/T gets a more than its fair share of play in my car...
And I think it holds up really well. There are a few clunkers on there, but the great songs are really great. Parachutes, Unemployable, and Army Reserve are some of my favorite PJ songs, and they give me all sorts of triumphant Eddie feelings.
tragabigzanda wrote:I listen to S/T a LOT, because
A) I can only listen to CDs on the canyon drive from Big Sky to Bozeman;
B) I sold almost every non-PJ CD I owned a few years ago;
C) I never bought a PJ CD after S/T, and
D) all the older PJ CDs have scratches on them.
So as I say, S/T gets a more than its fair share of play in my car...
And I think it holds up really well. There are a few clunkers on there, but the great songs are really great. Parachutes, Unemployable, and Army Reserve are some of my favorite PJ songs, and they give me all sorts of triumphant Eddie feelings.
Do you have a computer? You can burn your own CDs now.
