How did you feel when they dropped the Bullets moniker?E.H. Ruddock wrote:I didn't want to be a sixers fan like everyone around me growing up?Kaius wrote:Why are you a Wizards fan?
NBA Thread
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: NBA Thread
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52034
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: NBA Thread
I liked the Bullets way better. But I think that change was announced right as I was going to boot camp, so by the time I was done with a year of training all the news around it had died down. I still think they could have come up with a better name than Wizards, though.Kaius wrote:How did you feel when they dropped the Bullets moniker?E.H. Ruddock wrote:I didn't want to be a sixers fan like everyone around me growing up?Kaius wrote:Why are you a Wizards fan?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28128
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: NBA Thread
I am fascinated with the idea of a Spurs/Warriors Western Conference Finals. The Spurs would certainly make the Warriors work to get their usual offense. The matchups and game to game tinkering would be a delight.turned2black wrote:I don't think the Spurs will catch them. Pop will stick to his rest schedule and that'll cost them a few games. I suspect they'll lose 2 or 3 on their upcoming Rodeo Road Trip.verb_to_trust wrote:Will they finish ahead of the warriors?
A 7-game series between them is a toss-up to me. The Spurs depth and defensive pressure could really challenge the Warriors. The Spurs wear teams out with that defense. Other teams work soooooo hard to get a decent shot, that when the 4th rolls around they are dead on their feet. They are tired of setting picks that don't get anyone free, tired of beating their man only to be met with help defense, tired passing lanes being cut off and tired of no freebie 3-pointers. It's a glorious thing to watch night in and night out. Add the ball movement and Kawhi's emergence on offense and they'll be tough to beat in a 7-game series. And if Aldridge shoots a decent percentage, it's lights out.
The Warriors will not get the looks they are accustomed to getting because the Spurs are so disciplined and their depth will mean they won't be run off the floor.
Something tells me the Thunder will find a way into the WCF though.
-
nyquillyn
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5825
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: NBA Thread
Centers:
1. Wilt
2. Kareem
3. Russell
4. Hakeem
5. Shaq
6. The Admiral
7. Moses
8. Ewing
9. Lanier
10. Dikembe
Thoughts:
--1-3 are kinda set in stone to me. Maybe not in that order, but those 3 are clearly the best ever.
--Hakeem was better than most people realized. He's probably the most well-rounded player on this list. He had a season when he average 4.6 blocks a game. And to me, those two championship runs featured some of the most-dominate performances ever displayed. I'd honestly put those up there with some of Jordan's performance.
--It pained me to put Shaq above Robinson. The Admiral and Hakeem are the only centers to average 3 blocks or better for an entire career. The Admiral was also DPoY. And Shaq could be a liability on the defensive end. Shaq had 9 years when he didn't even average 2 blocks a game. That's flat-out pathetic. And his pick and roll D was just bad. David also lost 2 prime years with his military services. That being said, Shaq was finals MVP 3 times and had twice as many all-NBA first team selections. And David simply didn't have the longevity and his numbers really dropped with Duncan next to him.
--I really just threw Dikembe in at No. 10 because he was fun. It probably should be Mikan or one of the great passing centers like Cowens or Unseld.
1. Wilt
2. Kareem
3. Russell
4. Hakeem
5. Shaq
6. The Admiral
7. Moses
8. Ewing
9. Lanier
10. Dikembe
Thoughts:
--1-3 are kinda set in stone to me. Maybe not in that order, but those 3 are clearly the best ever.
--Hakeem was better than most people realized. He's probably the most well-rounded player on this list. He had a season when he average 4.6 blocks a game. And to me, those two championship runs featured some of the most-dominate performances ever displayed. I'd honestly put those up there with some of Jordan's performance.
--It pained me to put Shaq above Robinson. The Admiral and Hakeem are the only centers to average 3 blocks or better for an entire career. The Admiral was also DPoY. And Shaq could be a liability on the defensive end. Shaq had 9 years when he didn't even average 2 blocks a game. That's flat-out pathetic. And his pick and roll D was just bad. David also lost 2 prime years with his military services. That being said, Shaq was finals MVP 3 times and had twice as many all-NBA first team selections. And David simply didn't have the longevity and his numbers really dropped with Duncan next to him.
--I really just threw Dikembe in at No. 10 because he was fun. It probably should be Mikan or one of the great passing centers like Cowens or Unseld.
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 48539
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: NBA Thread
i'd still put robinson over shaq
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: NBA Thread
Without looking at numbers at all I think you could make the argument that peak Hakeem (those years when Jordan was out) was every bit as good as Wilt, Kareem or Russell. He was so fucking good for that stretch.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
-
nyquillyn
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5825
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: NBA Thread
I think it's hard for Hakeem to compete with Wilt. Wilt's first 9 to 10 years are insane and really NOBODY can ever touch those numbers. He essentially averaged 40/25. He can at least compete against Kareem. Kareem's peak was probably 6 to 7 years were he averaged 30/16. Hakeem's peak was about 26/13. Defensively, I'd give a slight edge to Hakeem. But as I said previously in this thread, Kareem's longevity was insane, 18 years of 20+ points is almost unthinkable. You can legitimately make a case that Kareem was a top 10 player in the NBA for 15 years.
Other than rebounding, most of what made Russell great was defense and intangibles, so in that regard it's fairly easy to make a case for Hakeem over Russell.
Other than rebounding, most of what made Russell great was defense and intangibles, so in that regard it's fairly easy to make a case for Hakeem over Russell.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: NBA Thread
turned2black wrote:I think it's hard for Hakeem to compete with Wilt. Wilt's first 9 to 10 years are insane and really NOBODY can ever touch those numbers. He essentially averaged 40/25. He can at least compete against Kareem. Kareem's peak was probably 6 to 7 years were he averaged 30/16. Hakeem's peak was about 26/13. Defensively, I'd give a slight edge to Hakeem. But as I said previously in this thread, Kareem's longevity was insane, 18 years of 20+ points is almost unthinkable. You can legitimately make a case that Kareem was a top 10 player in the NBA for 15 years.
Other than rebounding, most of what made Russell great was defense and intangibles, so in that regard it's fairly easy to make a case for Hakeem over Russell.
Oh, im not talking overall. No quibble with your top 3 for entire body of work. But Hakeem over that brief stretch was just damn amazing.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
-
nyquillyn
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5825
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: NBA Thread
Absolutely. And Hakeem fucking owned The Admiral whenever they played. It wasn't even close. I think those match-ups were largely why Robinson got painted as "soft" in his early years. But in all honesty, Hakeem would just go through stretches when he was unstoppable and everybody looked "soft" against him.
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28128
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: NBA Thread
Hakeem is top 4 for sure.
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12537
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: NBA Thread
1. Kareem
2. Russell
3. Wilt
4. Hakeem
5. Shaq
6. Moses
7. The Admiral
8. Ewing
9. Willis Reed
10. The Chief
2. Russell
3. Wilt
4. Hakeem
5. Shaq
6. Moses
7. The Admiral
8. Ewing
9. Willis Reed
10. The Chief
-
nyquillyn
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5825
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: NBA Thread
Once you get out of the top 7 or 8, it becomes murky as hell. Tons of "very good to great" centers with fairly identical stats.
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12537
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: NBA Thread
Yeah Chief was my version of your Dikembe pick. I almost went with Smits. Really Sabonis should be top 5 but I never saw him in his prime.
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12537
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: NBA Thread
Though a lot of those guys I never saw in their prime or at all maybe Sabonis should be in there. Of course it wasn't the NBA.
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12537
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: NBA Thread
1. Kareem
2. Russell
3. Wilt
4. Hakeem
5. Sabonis
6. Shaq
7. Moses
8. The Admiral
9. Ewing
10. Willis Reed
2. Russell
3. Wilt
4. Hakeem
5. Sabonis
6. Shaq
7. Moses
8. The Admiral
9. Ewing
10. Willis Reed
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: NBA Thread
WHERES LUC LONGLEY 72-10 M'FERS
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12537
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: NBA Thread
That was all Wellington.
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: NBA Thread
RIK SMITS?
-
nyquillyn
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5825
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: NBA Thread
What about Big Country?
- Spoiler: show
