Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler

Post by EJ »

BurtReynolds wrote:something i read recently. have no idea if its true or not.
Eyelids for sleeping Ewoks had to be created by ILM for The Ewok Adventure, since the original masks used in Return of the Jedi did not have any. A recent Blu-ray release for Return of the Jedi would digitally add them, however, allowing the dry-eyed heroes to blink for the first time.
they probably had some wear and tear on them too.
I'm not seeing any eyelids or blinking. Creepy. And where's its other paw?
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

BurtReynolds wrote:GODDAMNIT STOP MAKING ME TALK ABOUT STAR WARS I HATE THAT FUCCKING MOVIE
This isn't SW. It's ewoks.
User avatar
tommymtcom
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4306
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: there all is aching

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler

Post by tommymtcom »

EJ wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:something i read recently. have no idea if its true or not.
Eyelids for sleeping Ewoks had to be created by ILM for The Ewok Adventure, since the original masks used in Return of the Jedi did not have any. A recent Blu-ray release for Return of the Jedi would digitally add them, however, allowing the dry-eyed heroes to blink for the first time.
they probably had some wear and tear on them too.
I'm not seeing any eyelids or blinking. Creepy. And where's its other paw?
You don't want to know.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

tommymtcom wrote:
EJ wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:something i read recently. have no idea if its true or not.
Eyelids for sleeping Ewoks had to be created by ILM for The Ewok Adventure, since the original masks used in Return of the Jedi did not have any. A recent Blu-ray release for Return of the Jedi would digitally add them, however, allowing the dry-eyed heroes to blink for the first time.
they probably had some wear and tear on them too.
I'm not seeing any eyelids or blinking. Creepy. And where's its other paw?
You don't want to know.
Image
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45833
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler

Post by BurtReynolds »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:GODDAMNIT STOP MAKING ME TALK ABOUT STAR WARS I HATE THAT FUCCKING MOVIE
This isn't SW. It's ewoks.
i will allow it
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 47972
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

if a guy's looking for a good time, should he listen to this?
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
tommymtcom
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4306
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: there all is aching

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler

Post by tommymtcom »

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:if a guy's looking for a good time, should he listen to this?
Go watch some Curb Your Enthusiasm.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 47972
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

tommymtcom wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:if a guy's looking for a good time, should he listen to this?
Go watch some Curb Your Enthusiasm.
what's that?
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler

Post by stip »

Strat wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Image
I may have had a crush on her when i watched that in my youth.
that's basically what my youngest daughter is going to look like in a few years...
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler

Post by stip »

Image
Image
Image


but she's two, strat, so don't go getting any ideas
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45833
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler

Post by BurtReynolds »

that's what she looks like now!
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler

Post by stip »

time flies!
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler

Post by VinylGuy »

Great conversation guys. I really appreciate this, and its nice to actually have a talk about a theme.

Thoughts:

- michael bay is an auteur. True.

- movie making is such a collective expression. Great discussion.

- i would adore to talk with Joey about Girls for hours. Im guessing he has some really good thoughts about it.

- Agree with LV's take on ROTJ.


Looking forward to the next one!!
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Dev
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7507
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:46 pm

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler

Post by Dev »

I went and saw Brooklyn because of you guys, which makes no sense because I don't agree with any of your opinions, but I was like, "oh yeh, my rm bros must be right," but I definitely could have lived without seeing the movie.
AMAB
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler

Post by epilogue »

Dev wrote:I went and saw Brooklyn because of you guys, which makes no sense because I don't agree with any of your opinions, but I was like, "oh yeh, my rm bros must be right," but I definitely could have lived without seeing the movie.
:haha:
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler

Post by epilogue »

Sorry you didn't like it, Dev.
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 47972
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

i still haven't listened to this
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
Dev
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7507
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:46 pm

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler

Post by Dev »

durdencommatyler wrote:Sorry you didn't like it, Dev.
it wasn't a bad movie necessarily, but it didn't have any real impact on me either. And I think her story is kind of an unbecoming story... so that puts me off.
AMAB
User avatar
tommymtcom
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4306
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: there all is aching

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler

Post by tommymtcom »

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:i still haven't listened to this
Why not?
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler

Post by epilogue »

Dev wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Sorry you didn't like it, Dev.
it wasn't a bad movie necessarily, but it didn't have any real impact on me either. And I think her story is kind of an unbecoming story... so that puts me off.
Interesting. What was unbecoming about it for you?
Post Reply