He'll be the elephant in the room, but not have to care about preparing for itSimple Torture wrote:Word now is that Trump is going to skip the next Fox debate. Big deal / little deal / no big deal?
Election 2016
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Election 2016
(patriotic choking noises)
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52023
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Election 2016
And he's skipping specifically because megan kelley will be there, right? HilariousSimple Torture wrote:Word now is that Trump is going to skip the next Fox debate. Big deal / little deal / no big deal?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- tommymtcom
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4306
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
- Location: there all is aching
Re: Election 2016
What is trumps beef with Megan Kelley?
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35418
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Election 2016
She wont fuck himtommymtcom wrote:What is trumps beef with Megan Kelley?
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36758
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Election 2016
It's simultaneously a temper tantrum and a power play. It's kind of astounding, really.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36758
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Election 2016
How serious is that statement? I don't buy that you only care about issues that affect you directly.E.H. Ruddock wrote:*shrugs*LoathedVermin72 wrote:that's fucked up, ruddoE.H. Ruddock wrote:My wife and I are past having any more kids, so I guess I don't care about ab*rtion
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: Election 2016
I think Ruddo is alluding to his privilege here. He is trying to acknowledge the lived experiences of the fecund.theplatypus wrote:How serious is that statement? I don't buy that you only care about issues that affect you directly.E.H. Ruddock wrote:*shrugs*LoathedVermin72 wrote:that's fucked up, ruddoE.H. Ruddock wrote:My wife and I are past having any more kids, so I guess I don't care about ab*rtion
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46237
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: Election 2016
I would like to change my vote to Ramsay Bolton.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52023
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Election 2016
I'm just trying to make the point that in order to find the best candidate for me, I have to prioritize the issues and figure out what is most important to me, possibly sacrificing some other values/ideas. No candidate is going to agree with all of my values. Of course I care about abortion, guys.theplatypus wrote:How serious is that statement? I don't buy that you only care about issues that affect you directly.E.H. Ruddock wrote:*shrugs*LoathedVermin72 wrote:that's fucked up, ruddoE.H. Ruddock wrote:My wife and I are past having any more kids, so I guess I don't care about ab*rtion
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Election 2016
This logic is exactly why I say the voting cutoff should be around 50. We are eternally dealing with the fallout of half-informed dumbdumb retirees who will burn tomorrow's bridges for today's sweet ease. The combination of "I need to look out for my interests above all others" with "I won't be around for the consequences" and "my values are decades behind reality" just sucks.E.H. Ruddock wrote:I'm just trying to make the point that in order to find the best candidate for me, I have to prioritize the issues and figure out what is most important to me, possibly sacrificing some other values/ideas. No candidate is going to agree with all of my values. Of course I care about abortion, guys.theplatypus wrote:How serious is that statement? I don't buy that you only care about issues that affect you directly.E.H. Ruddock wrote:*shrugs*LoathedVermin72 wrote:that's fucked up, ruddoE.H. Ruddock wrote:My wife and I are past having any more kids, so I guess I don't care about ab*rtion
(patriotic choking noises)
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52023
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Election 2016
So you are saying that if a candidate that I identify with on a couple of issues, but not on a main issue, is the one I should vote for because it is for the greater good? And how is it that because I want to find someone that has the most values that I identify with means that my values are decades behind reality?McParadigm wrote:This logic is exactly why I say the voting cutoff should be around 50. We are eternally dealing with the fallout of half-informed dumbdumb retirees who will burn tomorrow's bridges for today's sweet ease. The combination of "I need to look out for my interests above all others" with "I won't be around for the consequences" and "my values are decades behind reality" just sucks.E.H. Ruddock wrote:I'm just trying to make the point that in order to find the best candidate for me, I have to prioritize the issues and figure out what is most important to me, possibly sacrificing some other values/ideas. No candidate is going to agree with all of my values. Of course I care about abortion, guys.theplatypus wrote:How serious is that statement? I don't buy that you only care about issues that affect you directly.E.H. Ruddock wrote:*shrugs*LoathedVermin72 wrote:that's fucked up, ruddoE.H. Ruddock wrote:My wife and I are past having any more kids, so I guess I don't care about ab*rtion
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52023
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Election 2016
And what if I feel as though the issues that are important to me are also important to tomorrow and the future? Jesus McP. It isn't a selfish method if I think the issues are universally important. I'm really confused.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- tommymtcom
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4306
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
- Location: there all is aching
Re: Election 2016
I don't think he was specifically talking about you, Ruddock. His was more a blanket statement about how baby boomers are fucking everything up because they are selfish assholes.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Election 2016
Sort of. I don't think they're the only generation guilty of or likely to do this in the future. I think everybody does what Ruddo is talking about to one degree or another, and as you get old and your interests are less and less about the future and your perceptions less inspired by the present, you become part of the worst and coincidentally loudest voting group on earth.tommymtcom wrote:I don't think he was specifically talking about you, Ruddock. His was more a blanket statement about how baby boomers are fucking everything up because they are selfish assholes.
That's not what I said. What I said was that you will still pursue candidates who most value what you identify with when what you identify with is no longer in the nation's or world's best interests. This behavior you exhibit now, and the other things I mentioned,which (to be clear) I think all of us exhibit to some degree, will blend with your (our) old age to make you (us) an especially shitty voter (group). Hell, we'll probably be worse than the Boomers.And how is it that because I want to find someone that has the most values that I identify with means that my values are decades behind reality?
(patriotic choking noises)
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52023
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Election 2016
What do we want?E.H. Ruddock wrote:
"Less voting rights!"
When do we want them!
"That's not for us to say!"
(patriotic choking noises)
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: Election 2016
Eh, I think most Xers will just say "fuck it" as they see the system screw them again, and just make do with what's available.
George Carlin had the best monologue on the typical Boomer critique--but it was actually his own generation (the Silents) that got the freest ride in recent history.
George Carlin had the best monologue on the typical Boomer critique--but it was actually his own generation (the Silents) that got the freest ride in recent history.
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46237
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: Election 2016
Wow this is pretty shocking to learn that people vote based on self interest. At least we have those new millennial voters who are well known to put others ahead of themselves and are deeply concerned about the future and not what is happening in the next five minutes.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37454
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Election 2016
Burt
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Election 2016
feel the burt