Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Rate S/T

5 Stars
11
19%
4 Stars
19
33%
3 Stars
26
46%
2 Stars
0
No votes
1 Star
1
2%
 
Total votes: 57

User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by 96583UP »

i think how much yield is 'loved' on this board may have more to do with the median age of the board's median posting member

yield probably falling right in the sweet spot somewhere of the having disposable income / ability to actually see PJ on tour on one's space-time-youth-continuum

given that the 96 tour was tiny

and a bunch of people here may have been too young to have seen them prior to 96

and in 98 they did a pre-riot act popularity grab so there were a lot of opportunities for people in high school/college to actually see them play

and Matt Cameron was in good form with them then

and there was no need to bring Dave A back

which has since changed
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
Leatherhead
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4280
Joined: Fri August 09, 2013 4:38 am

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Leatherhead »

96583UP wrote:i think how much yield is 'loved' on this board may have more to do with the median age of the board's median posting member

yield probably falling right in the sweet spot somewhere of the having disposable income / ability to actually see PJ on tour on one's space-time-youth-continuum

given that the 96 tour was tiny

and a bunch of people here may have been too young to have seen them prior to 96

and in 98 they did a pre-riot act popularity grab so there were a lot of opportunities for people in high school/college to actually see them play

and Matt Cameron was in good form with them then

and there was no need to bring Dave A back

which has since changed
I really don't think so.
User avatar
Iholdthepain
Future Drummer
Posts: 3096
Joined: Wed February 26, 2014 12:08 am
Location: the afterlife...

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Iholdthepain »

Leatherhead wrote:
96583UP wrote:i think how much yield is 'loved' on this board may have more to do with the median age of the board's median posting member

yield probably falling right in the sweet spot somewhere of the having disposable income / ability to actually see PJ on tour on one's space-time-youth-continuum

given that the 96 tour was tiny

and a bunch of people here may have been too young to have seen them prior to 96

and in 98 they did a pre-riot act popularity grab so there were a lot of opportunities for people in high school/college to actually see them play

and Matt Cameron was in good form with them then

and there was no need to bring Dave A back

which has since changed
I really don't think so.
I do...the love for Yield, in comparison with the 1993-1996 run of Vs-Vitalogy-No Code, is way out of whack here on RM. I was fortunate enough to see all three of these tours, too, all of which destroyed the 1998 tour. 1994 was the band's live and creative peak...

Team Dave A
User avatar
LikeLukin
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 384
Joined: Tue June 25, 2013 5:59 pm
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
Contact:

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by LikeLukin »

I think their best album is Yield, and I didn't see the band live until 2005. I didn't become a fan until 2001, and was initially sucked in by Ten at that time.
User avatar
Leatherhead
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4280
Joined: Fri August 09, 2013 4:38 am

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Leatherhead »

LikeLukin wrote:I think their best album is Yield, and I didn't see the band live until 2005. I didn't become a fan until 2001, and was initially sucked in by Ten at that time.
I think Binaural is their best album, with Yield definitely in the top 4, and I didn't see the band live until 2009. Didn't become a fan until 2006, when Pearl Jam came out. And was also sucked in by Ten, albeit along with Pearl Jam and Rearviewmirror.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Strat »

Binaural is easily their best album. Ever. And I saw PJ in 95. Their creative peak was not 94. They were only touching the surface. No Code through Binaural is sublime. The 2000 shows were a culmination of all of the tours combined. Focused. Emotional. Tight. Songs that held up and setlists that could go on for miles to back up the top tier era of PJ.
User avatar
LikeLukin
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 384
Joined: Tue June 25, 2013 5:59 pm
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
Contact:

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by LikeLukin »

Strat wrote:Binaural is easily their best album. Ever. And I saw PJ in 95. Their creative peak was not 94. They were only touching the surface. No Code through Binaural is sublime. The 2000 shows were a culmination of all of the tours combined. Focused. Emotional. Tight. Songs that held up and setlists that could go on for miles to back up the top tier era of PJ.
I can get behind all of this :thumbsup:

You're my new favorite RMer :luv:
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

Listened to this one yesterday after a while, and yeah i love it. The production, of maybe the mix, sucks. But i really enjoyed how into it the band is, and most of the songs too...i dont think there is a song from here that i actually dont like.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45833
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by BurtReynolds »

Image
RM's resident disinformation expert.
chewm
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4401
Joined: Fri July 26, 2013 12:34 am
Location: chewm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by chewm »

VinylGuy wrote:i dont think there is a song from here that i actually dont like.
Same. Great album.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Strat »

Its the last album that at the very least, felt like a band playing together.
User avatar
Brett
AnalLog
Posts: 1606
Joined: Mon January 07, 2013 5:30 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Brett »

Stip was definitely right that there would be some revision in people's opinions vis-a-vis this album after several years of having Backspacer and Lightning Bolt kicking around.

I still don't like the overall product. The same songs I've always liked (mainly "Parachutes," "Marker," and "Unemployable") are still my favorites. I don't think I could ever come around the way that others have to this record. But then again, my favorite Pearl Jam material, even early on, was always the more subdued, moodier, or outright unconventional stuff.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

time just makes it easier to appreciate and evaluate an album on its own terms (and find stuff to enjoy) since it no longer is answerable to the listeners preexisting expectations and demands
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

stip wrote:time just makes it easier to appreciate and evaluate an album on its own terms (and find stuff to enjoy) since it no longer is answerable to the listeners preexisting expectations and demands
thing is, S/T grew on me and I love it now. But after the same amount of time it took me to like S/T, I still hate Backspacer as much if not more.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
tommymtcom
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4306
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: there all is aching

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by tommymtcom »

I still hate most of this album.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Strat »

I still like most of this album
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Fri January 02, 2026 9:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by EJ »

Marker, Parachutes, and Army Reserve still rank up with my favorite PJ tunes.

I wouldn't be too upset if I never heard the rest of the album again.
chewm
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4401
Joined: Fri July 26, 2013 12:34 am
Location: chewm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by chewm »

tragabigzanda wrote: I still hate Gone, Wasted Reprise, and the "bonus cut" at the end.
I always loved this.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Comatose is the bees knees, guys.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
Post Reply