It wasn't too far off.theplatypus wrote:Thanks for clarifying, STSimple Torture wrote:(paraphrasing)
Election 2016
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21689
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Election 2016
McParadigm wrote:lol
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: Election 2016
I dread it would be Ben Carson.Simple Torture wrote:It's gotta be a woman or a person of color, right? You might almost say it should be some policy wonk or brainy guy, but Romney tried that with Paul Ryan, and he was boring as funk.
-
nyquillyn
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5825
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: Election 2016
Tim Scott would be a better choice.Green Habit wrote:I dread it would be Ben Carson.Simple Torture wrote:It's gotta be a woman or a person of color, right? You might almost say it should be some policy wonk or brainy guy, but Romney tried that with Paul Ryan, and he was boring as funk.
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21689
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Election 2016
Looks like I was wrong: early reports suggest Christie is heading home to New Jersey, and not to grab a pair of pants like Carson did last week.Simple Torture wrote:Christie sticks around, I think, because he was basically tied with Kasich until a week ago in the polls, so his camp could probably envision a similar bump.The Argonaut wrote:If Rubio sticks in fifth and stays below 10%, this opens this whole thing back up. In terms of winnowing the field, this is the worst possibility. Christie/Fiorina may be the only casualties of tonight. All that means is that it will take a little longer for three from the 'establishment lane' to get kicked out, allowing Trump to win more primaries.
The sad thing about the Dems is that even if Sanders pulls a miracle and is able to win states and stay close to tied with Clinton for delegates, won't the super-delegates hand it to Clinton? I would imagine that most of the people that the Party make super-delegates are behind Clinton, no?
McParadigm wrote:lol
-
b_i_revisited
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Mon October 26, 2015 2:04 pm
Re: Election 2016
Maybe true, but they should look at the longer term effects. Whomever ends up as the next President is going to inherit and be blamed for an economic shitstorm and the people who support the Hilldabeast in large numbers are dying off. Perhaps, just perhaps, they should Obi-won this one so they gain a massive upperhand in 2020. Run with Sanders, run with their next generation's ideas to get them out there and people talking about (democratic socialism or whatever we call f*cking-over the middle class now-a-days) and then they have planted a revolution.cutuphalfdead wrote:But the Clinton/Carter model makes them more money.b_i_revisited wrote:It's tragic. There is obviously demand in the party for those ideas, they should embrace them.matt reeder wrote:They turned on him the moment he really started to pick up momentum. They are terrified of him because he exposes them for what they've been for so many years: the party that tries to fight for social and environmental issues but cozies up corporate leaders to maintain their tenuous grip on power.stip wrote:It is interesting to watch the Democratic establishment turn against Sanders, now that he is seen as a semi-credible threat.
I think it's fascinating to watch them twist themselves into knots arguing that less change is somehow better.
http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=1278Alex wrote:i wonder what the supermassive jackhole broken iris would have thought about this
-
b_i_revisited
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Mon October 26, 2015 2:04 pm
Re: Election 2016
We could have this one out in another thread, if you like. *tosses gauntlet*stip wrote:I beg to disagree, obviously.b_i_revisited wrote:Not the thread for this discussion, but this is simply not true.stip wrote: That's one of the cardinal differences between these sorts of centrist democrats and the democratic populist socialism that built the welfare state. The later understood that in the United States you cannot have discussions about growth without also having conversations about distribution, and that in the US distribution is more important than growth, as we have long ago conquered the problem of scarcity (how do we make enough to provide everyone with a decent standard of living).
http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=1278Alex wrote:i wonder what the supermassive jackhole broken iris would have thought about this
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16296
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: Election 2016
I'd definitely be interested in reading this.b_i_revisited wrote:We could have this one out in another thread, if you like. *tosses gauntlet*stip wrote:I beg to disagree, obviously.b_i_revisited wrote:Not the thread for this discussion, but this is simply not true.stip wrote: That's one of the cardinal differences between these sorts of centrist democrats and the democratic populist socialism that built the welfare state. The later understood that in the United States you cannot have discussions about growth without also having conversations about distribution, and that in the US distribution is more important than growth, as we have long ago conquered the problem of scarcity (how do we make enough to provide everyone with a decent standard of living).
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Election 2016
ill participate as best i can - but a relatively light stretch at work just ended so i may be sporadic if thoughtful posts are requiredb_i_revisited wrote:We could have this one out in another thread, if you like. *tosses gauntlet*stip wrote:I beg to disagree, obviously.b_i_revisited wrote:Not the thread for this discussion, but this is simply not true.stip wrote: That's one of the cardinal differences between these sorts of centrist democrats and the democratic populist socialism that built the welfare state. The later understood that in the United States you cannot have discussions about growth without also having conversations about distribution, and that in the US distribution is more important than growth, as we have long ago conquered the problem of scarcity (how do we make enough to provide everyone with a decent standard of living).
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36758
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Election 2016
Christie's out.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
-
Electromatic
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3679
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: Election 2016
theplatypus wrote:Christie's out.
I wish Bush would follow.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Election 2016
Green Habit wrote:I dread it would be Ben Carson.Simple Torture wrote:It's gotta be a woman or a person of color, right? You might almost say it should be some policy wonk or brainy guy, but Romney tried that with Paul Ryan, and he was boring as funk.
Not this year with that candidate. I'm not saying it wouldn't be, but he's clearly not running under the banner of inclusivity. And somebody like O'Riley has a wide following, isn't tainted by any kind of record, plays right into the 'we're a team of winners' platform he's running on, and provides exceptional free media coverage.
This idea scares the crap out of me. It's brilliant.
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6989
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: Election 2016
So this remaining a five-way for at least the next two primaries really helps Trump. If they all stick around through Super Tuesday it's going to be a tremendous advantage for him. He could actually do this thing.
TRUMP-SANDERS IS HAPPENING!!!!!!
TRUMP-SANDERS IS HAPPENING!!!!!!
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36758
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Election 2016
I'd pay a good amount of money to see a Trump vs. Sanders debate.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35418
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Election 2016
I really cant imagine trump handling himself well in a 1 on 1 debate. He shines when there are 12 children barking at each other the entire time.
- dpupenya
- Thread Killer
- Posts: 1308
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:57 am
Re: Election 2016
Carly out
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: Election 2016
O'Reilly hates nitty-gritty politics, though. I don't think he'd be as natural as you think.stip wrote:Not this year with that candidate. I'm not saying it wouldn't be, but he's clearly not running under the banner of inclusivity. And somebody like O'Riley has a wide following, isn't tainted by any kind of record, plays right into the 'we're a team of winners' platform he's running on, and provides exceptional free media coverage.Green Habit wrote:I dread it would be Ben Carson.Simple Torture wrote:It's gotta be a woman or a person of color, right? You might almost say it should be some policy wonk or brainy guy, but Romney tried that with Paul Ryan, and he was boring as funk.
This idea scares the crap out of me. It's brilliant.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Election 2016
A lot of international media even seems confused about wtf is going with this campaign, particularly within the Clinton/Sanders situation..
anyone able to explain it>
oh, and this
anyone able to explain it>
oh, and this
- Spoiler: show
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46239
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: Election 2016
I thought they didn't get along? He'd have to quit his show I think, and he wouldn't want to do that.Green Habit wrote:O'Reilly hates nitty-gritty politics, though. I don't think he'd be as natural as you think.stip wrote:Not this year with that candidate. I'm not saying it wouldn't be, but he's clearly not running under the banner of inclusivity. And somebody like O'Riley has a wide following, isn't tainted by any kind of record, plays right into the 'we're a team of winners' platform he's running on, and provides exceptional free media coverage.Green Habit wrote:I dread it would be Ben Carson.Simple Torture wrote:It's gotta be a woman or a person of color, right? You might almost say it should be some policy wonk or brainy guy, but Romney tried that with Paul Ryan, and he was boring as funk.
This idea scares the crap out of me. It's brilliant.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: Election 2016
Trump's been on O'Reilly's show numerous times in the past. But Kasich is the guy he likes the most, he was O'Reilly's backup host whenever he went on vacation before Kasich went back into politics.BurtReynolds wrote:I thought they didn't get along? He'd have to quit his show I think, and he wouldn't want to do that.