philpritchard wrote:I always just assume Cash is leading in everything until I see the actual leaderboard.@SkitchP wrote:CopperTom wrote:I wish I knew who the league leaders are.
In the important categories like stolen bases.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
Has everyone else been keeping track of them? I did the first couple tournaments, but no one else was, so I stopped.CopperTom wrote:Who leads the league in Webgems (+)? Hugh Duffy leads the Braves with 4.philpritchard wrote:I always just assume Cash is leading in everything until I see the actual leaderboard.@SkitchP wrote:CopperTom wrote:I wish I knew who the league leaders are.
In the important categories like stolen bases.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
I enjoyed tracking them to see who was worth keeping in defensively, and it would be even easier if most of us are just copy-and-pasting anyway.@SkitchP wrote:yeah, i dont track those.
Arrieta with a win and a loss on the same day too.TBAMTS wrote:Giants-Cubs game 1 was sure a wild one. I've been waiting for Marmol to go full on Marmol, and he finally did, 0.1 IP 0 Hits 4 BB 4 runs.
It would depend on how many teams there were, but I feel like an odd number makes more sense, be it one or three.CopperTom wrote:How many games per day do you want the play?
We've reached a point where Skitch is the only person left still using platoons. He did win a championship with platoons though, so it makes sense...@SkitchP wrote:He's been average. I think im going to sit him against LHP
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
I have no clue who is playing well and who isn't. I basically just check the scores and standings each day. I know that I've split every series except one! That's kinda crazy. 
I know I've been gone for a long time, but did I miss the berth of a Kaius-Argo rivalry?Kaius wrote:Take THAT dumba$$
Eh, you're more or less right on time.Lament wrote:I know I've been gone for a long time, but did I miss the berth of a Kaius-Argo rivalry?Kaius wrote:Take THAT dumba$$
It looks like 29-26 is the best record anyone has had and not made the playoffs in one of our tournaments, so as long as you can maintain those six games over .500 you should be in great shape.TBAMTS wrote:5 straight splits after the 6-0 start
Are we doing top three or four make the playoffs?Lament wrote:It looks like 29-26 is the best record anyone has had and not made the playoffs in one of our tournaments, so as long as you can maintain those six games over .500 you should be in great shape.TBAMTS wrote:5 straight splits after the 6-0 start
I thought we upped it to four when we got to twenty teams.philpritchard wrote:Are we doing top three or four make the playoffs?Lament wrote:It looks like 29-26 is the best record anyone has had and not made the playoffs in one of our tournaments, so as long as you can maintain those six games over .500 you should be in great shape.TBAMTS wrote:5 straight splits after the 6-0 start