2015 All-Time Franchise Tournament: WHITE SOX WIN!

[Norah]

ERA leaders with minimum 40IP:

[@SkitchP]

stats updated.

and chud, somewhere I picked up an extra GS for the giants. I am not sure what i screwed up. If you happen to notice where, please let me know.

My sheet has 38 starts for the Giants with 38 games entered.

I see what happened. I had put some stats in the wrong line, and when I copied and pasted to fix it, it messed up one of the formulas. It's fixed now. Ill reupload the giants through 40.

[@SkitchP]

Skitch, you've got your rotations set to run through day 28, but the season ends after day 27. I don't know if this affects your pitching decisions, but I figured I'd point it out.

It doesn't. Im just schticking my inability to remember how many games there are in the season. I did the same thing the last 2 tournaments and the first half of this season.

[Norah]

stats updated.

and chud, somewhere I picked up an extra GS for the giants. I am not sure what i screwed up. If you happen to notice where, please let me know.

My sheet has 38 starts for the Giants with 38 games entered.

I see what happened. I had put some stats in the wrong line, and when I copied and pasted to fix it, it messed up one of the formulas. It's fixed now. Ill reupload the giants through 40.

When I'm at work tomorrow I'll re-copy/paste all the games so we know it's good.

[@SkitchP]

The only thing I regret about all my platooning is that so many of my guys dont even show up on leaderboards

[@SkitchP]

stats updated.

and chud, somewhere I picked up an extra GS for the giants. I am not sure what i screwed up. If you happen to notice where, please let me know.

My sheet has 38 starts for the Giants with 38 games entered.

I see what happened. I had put some stats in the wrong line, and when I copied and pasted to fix it, it messed up one of the formulas. It's fixed now. Ill reupload the giants through 40.

When I'm at work tomorrow I'll re-copy/paste all the games so we know it's good.

It's good. When you said it was 38 as of what you had, it meant that the problem had to come in todays games. I found it pretty quick. I checked the other two teams I have and it didnt have the same problem, so I just messed something up.

[Norah]

OPS leaders (minimum 120 AB)

[@SkitchP]

lol at Rogers Horsnby being in the top 12 for 3 different teams.


and shouldnt that be plate appearances, not At Bats to determine eligibility?

[Norah]

lol at Rogers Horsnby being in the top 12 for 3 different teams.


and shouldnt that be plate appearances, not At Bats to determine eligibility?

I don't have a column for plate appearances so I worked with what I have.

[Norah]

I guess I could calculate it but whatever

[@SkitchP]

I guess I could calculate it but whatever

dont get lazy now mr fancy glasses

[Norah]

I guess I could calculate it but whatever

dont get lazy now mr fancy glasses

No. I doubt setting a PA thresh-hold instead of AB would change much.

[@SkitchP]

I guess I could calculate it but whatever

dont get lazy now mr fancy glasses

No. I doubt setting a PA thresh-hold instead of AB would change much.

On my teams alone it would qualify 6 extra guys I think. Hard to tell because you only have my teams through 38.

[Norah]

I guess I could calculate it but whatever

dont get lazy now mr fancy glasses

No. I doubt setting a PA thresh-hold instead of AB would change much.

On my teams alone it would qualify 6 extra guys I think. Hard to tell because you only have my teams through 38.

Would any of those guys make the top 5?

[@SkitchP]

I guess I could calculate it but whatever

dont get lazy now mr fancy glasses

No. I doubt setting a PA thresh-hold instead of AB would change much.

On my teams alone it would qualify 6 extra guys I think. Hard to tell because you only have my teams through 38.

Would any of those guys make the top 5?

You've still included an inaccurate stat. My philosophy is if I don't have enough data to calculate the stat, I leave it out. But hey, I have standards.

Spoiler: show

http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4546&p=420187&hilit=philosophy#p420187

[Norah]

I guess I could calculate it but whatever

dont get lazy now mr fancy glasses

No. I doubt setting a PA thresh-hold instead of AB would change much.

On my teams alone it would qualify 6 extra guys I think. Hard to tell because you only have my teams through 38.

Would any of those guys make the top 5?

You've still included an inaccurate stat. My philosophy is if I don't have enough data to calculate the stat, I leave it out. But hey, I have standards.

Spoiler: show

http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4546&p=420187&hilit=philosophy#p420187

I could also just lower the AB threshold to include more of your players. Whether we use AB or PA it's entirely arbitrary.

Also, serves you right for fielding a team of pussies who can't handle the grind of playing ball every day.

[@SkitchP]

I guess I could calculate it but whatever

dont get lazy now mr fancy glasses

No. I doubt setting a PA thresh-hold instead of AB would change much.

On my teams alone it would qualify 6 extra guys I think. Hard to tell because you only have my teams through 38.

Would any of those guys make the top 5?

You've still included an inaccurate stat. My philosophy is if I don't have enough data to calculate the stat, I leave it out. But hey, I have standards.

Spoiler: show

http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4546&p=420187&hilit=philosophy#p420187

I could also just lower the AB threshold to include more of your players. Whether we use AB or PA it's entirely arbitrary.

Also, serves you right for fielding a team of pussies who can't handle the grind of playing ball every day.

Or you could just calculate leaderboards properly instead of being lazy.

[Norah]

I guess I could calculate it but whatever

dont get lazy now mr fancy glasses

No. I doubt setting a PA thresh-hold instead of AB would change much.

On my teams alone it would qualify 6 extra guys I think. Hard to tell because you only have my teams through 38.

Would any of those guys make the top 5?

You've still included an inaccurate stat. My philosophy is if I don't have enough data to calculate the stat, I leave it out. But hey, I have standards.

Spoiler: show

http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4546&p=420187&hilit=philosophy#p420187

I could also just lower the AB threshold to include more of your players. Whether we use AB or PA it's entirely arbitrary.

Also, serves you right for fielding a team of pussies who can't handle the grind of playing ball every day.

Or you could just calculate leaderboards properly instead of being lazy.

Go fuck yourself, skitch patterson. You're more than welcome to download the sheet and add a stat.

[@SkitchP]

or perhaps..

it should be 3.1 PA per game played.

But I also know that sometimes you don't adhere 100% to a stat's definition.

Spoiler: show

http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4546&p=420220&hilit=adhere#p420220

[@SkitchP]

I guess I could calculate it but whatever

dont get lazy now mr fancy glasses

No. I doubt setting a PA thresh-hold instead of AB would change much.

On my teams alone it would qualify 6 extra guys I think. Hard to tell because you only have my teams through 38.

Would any of those guys make the top 5?

You've still included an inaccurate stat. My philosophy is if I don't have enough data to calculate the stat, I leave it out. But hey, I have standards.

Spoiler: show

http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4546&p=420187&hilit=philosophy#p420187

I could also just lower the AB threshold to include more of your players. Whether we use AB or PA it's entirely arbitrary.

Also, serves you right for fielding a team of pussies who can't handle the grind of playing ball every day.

Or you could just calculate leaderboards properly instead of being lazy.

Go fuck yourself, skitch patterson. You're more than welcome to download the sheet and add a stat.

dont be salty chud.