Never heard that one...Christmas single?stip wrote:Hurricane 90s
III-39: You Are vs. Sad
-
bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: III-39: You Are vs. Sad
-
epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: III-39: You Are vs. Sad
Kevin Davis wrote:Man, garlic knots are the shit. Thanks, UJ.durdencommatyler wrote:Yes. Yes, they may.
And I'll get them some garlic knots.
-
LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33839
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: III-39: You Are vs. Sad
I voted for You Are primarily because I hate Taylor Swift
-
epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: III-39: You Are vs. Sad
You did the right thing.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I voted for You Are primarily because I hate Taylor Swift
-
chewm
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4401
- Joined: Fri July 26, 2013 12:34 am
- Location: chewm
Re: III-39: You Are vs. Sad
You Are is not vastly superior to Gone.darth_vedder wrote:Are you serious? Sad is a fantastic song, and while You Are is good, and obviously you like it better, it is not vastly superior. You Are is vastly superior to Gone, or The Fixer, or Future Days, but vastly superior against Sad? Like Guns N' Roses say, you're fucking crazy.Bammer wrote:Unfair fight. At least it should be. You Are is vastly superior.
How did Sad make it this far and how have 31 of you clowns kept voting for it.
Fuck it. I'm done with this tourney.
-
LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33839
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: III-39: You Are vs. Sad
Guys, shut up