Election 2016
- tommymtcom
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4306
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
- Location: there all is aching
Re: Election 2016
What we need is a none of the above option on the ballot. I think that would easily get more votes than trump or Clinton
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Election 2016
That would be my prediction. I don't think Warren would attach herself to Clinton's wagon, and Sanders will go back to the senate with an infinitely higher profile than he enjoyed before.Simple Torture wrote:Very little chance, I think. I don't think VP is a position in which Sanders could continue the work he likes to do--he'd either be debating on the Senate floor or be President to set the debate, I think, and not the weird figure-headish guy who usually gets to be VP. Clinton has lots of options, and if it looks like Trump's going to be the VP, one left-field option would be to choose a woman as a running mate, see if Trump would up the misogynistic rhetoric, and then try to encourage women to vote to block him. But more likely, I'd see her picking a non-controversial young Hispanic man. One of the Castro twins would be interesting.Strat wrote:What are the chances for a sandrs/clinton ticket ? Figure that would all but wipe the GOP out of contention no matter who gets the nod
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37455
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Election 2016
Yeah I know one or two.stip wrote:out of anecdotal curiosity, how many of you, in this extremely limited and demographically inaccurate sample, know people who are just flat out excited for Clinton? The only one I know is my mom.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: Election 2016
Has voter turnout ever been high enough in which it wouldn't win?tommymtcom wrote:What we need is a none of the above option on the ballot. I think that would easily get more votes than trump or Clinton
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21689
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Election 2016
Choosing a Hispanic running mate--someone young, someone who could run for president in 2020** or 2024--could be part of the Dems long-term strategy of turning states like Texas and Arizona blue. It might take half a generation, but it could be done.stip wrote:That would be my prediction. I don't think Warren would attach herself to Clinton's wagon, and Sanders will go back to the senate with an infinitely higher profile than he enjoyed before.Simple Torture wrote:Very little chance, I think. I don't think VP is a position in which Sanders could continue the work he likes to do--he'd either be debating on the Senate floor or be President to set the debate, I think, and not the weird figure-headish guy who usually gets to be VP. Clinton has lots of options, and if it looks like Trump's going to be the VP, one left-field option would be to choose a woman as a running mate, see if Trump would up the misogynistic rhetoric, and then try to encourage women to vote to block him. But more likely, I'd see her picking a non-controversial young Hispanic man. One of the Castro twins would be interesting.Strat wrote:What are the chances for a sandrs/clinton ticket ? Figure that would all but wipe the GOP out of contention no matter who gets the nod
**Why 2020? If Clinton wins the 2016 race "by default" (that is, she's up against Trump and voters decide "anybody but Trump please"), I'm not 100% convinced she'll run for re-election in 4 years.
McParadigm wrote:lol
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Election 2016
Oh god that would be ideal. that's such an important year.Simple Torture wrote:Choosing a Hispanic running mate--someone young, someone who could run for president in 2020** or 2024--could be part of the Dems long-term strategy of turning states like Texas and Arizona blue. It might take half a generation, but it could be done.stip wrote:That would be my prediction. I don't think Warren would attach herself to Clinton's wagon, and Sanders will go back to the senate with an infinitely higher profile than he enjoyed before.Simple Torture wrote:Very little chance, I think. I don't think VP is a position in which Sanders could continue the work he likes to do--he'd either be debating on the Senate floor or be President to set the debate, I think, and not the weird figure-headish guy who usually gets to be VP. Clinton has lots of options, and if it looks like Trump's going to be the VP, one left-field option would be to choose a woman as a running mate, see if Trump would up the misogynistic rhetoric, and then try to encourage women to vote to block him. But more likely, I'd see her picking a non-controversial young Hispanic man. One of the Castro twins would be interesting.Strat wrote:What are the chances for a sandrs/clinton ticket ? Figure that would all but wipe the GOP out of contention no matter who gets the nod
**Why 2020? If Clinton wins the 2016 race "by default" (that is, she's up against Trump and voters decide "anybody but Trump please"), I'm not 100% convinced she'll run for re-election in 4 years.
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
-
nyquillyn
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5825
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: Election 2016
I know Julian Castro is a sexy VP pick for her, but I'm not sure it actually makes much strategic sense, particularly if she faces Trump. She'll already have the hispanic and black vote locked up if that's the case. I think the people in this thread seem to have forgotten that the average American white dude still sees Hillary as a big "liberal" simply because of her last name. She'd probably be better off picking a moderate "white guy."
But that's totally thrown out the window if she faces Rubio, particularly if he picks someone like Tim Scott as a running mate. That's a fucking nightmare for the Dems.
But that's totally thrown out the window if she faces Rubio, particularly if he picks someone like Tim Scott as a running mate. That's a fucking nightmare for the Dems.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: Election 2016
Might as well just keep Biden in there.turned2black wrote:I know Julian Castro is a sexy VP pick for her, but I'm not sure it actually makes much strategic sense, particularly if she faces Trump. She'll already have the hispanic and black vote locked up if that's the case. I think the people in this thread seem to have forgotten that the average American white dude still sees Hillary as a big "liberal" simply because of her last name. She'd probably be better off picking a moderate "white guy."
- tommymtcom
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4306
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
- Location: there all is aching
Re: Election 2016
Do people really put a lot of stock in who the vp nominee is? It's not like they do anything.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37455
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Election 2016
Ask John McCain.tommymtcom wrote:Do people really put a lot of stock in who the vp nominee is? It's not like they do anything.
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35960
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: Election 2016
my mom, my wife, my sister, several cousins.stip wrote:out of anecdotal curiosity, how many of you, in this extremely limited and demographically inaccurate sample, know people who are just flat out excited for Clinton? The only one I know is my mom.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: Election 2016
I think I'm paraphrasing someone here: "A running mate may not win a presidential campaign, but a running mate could very easily lose it."cutuphalfdead wrote:Ask John McCain.tommymtcom wrote:Do people really put a lot of stock in who the vp nominee is? It's not like they do anything.
-
nyquillyn
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5825
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: Election 2016
turned2black wrote:Given both Clinton's and Trump's huge "dislike" numbers, VP picks will matter more than they usually do.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: Election 2016
I enjoy saying "Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III" in a Foghorn Leghorn voice.
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 25049
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: Election 2016
This was odd. Rep. Gabbard in Hawaii resigned from the DNC so that she could endorse Bernie.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/congresswoma ... ie-sanders
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/congresswoma ... ie-sanders
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: Election 2016
Rubio just mocked Trump's stubby fingers. "You know what they say about men w/ small hands..."
[pause, laughter]
"...you can't trust em."
[pause, laughter]
"...you can't trust em."
Dick/Balls
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Election 2016
Stay classy, Republicans
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Election 2016
Hopefully this paves the way for Bernie Sanders' new 'Bitches be shopping' stump speech
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35420
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Election 2016
#makedonalddrumpfagain
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52025
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Election 2016
Serious question;
I've not been paying attention the past couple of days, being sick makes me lose patience with TV, news, etc and so I don't usually follow. Tomorrow is Super Tuesday, right? Is it pretty clear that we will have both nominees after tomorrow?
I've not been paying attention the past couple of days, being sick makes me lose patience with TV, news, etc and so I don't usually follow. Tomorrow is Super Tuesday, right? Is it pretty clear that we will have both nominees after tomorrow?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG