Election 2016

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
tommymtcom
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4306
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: there all is aching

Re: Election 2016

Post by tommymtcom »

What we need is a none of the above option on the ballot. I think that would easily get more votes than trump or Clinton
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by stip »

Simple Torture wrote:
Strat wrote:What are the chances for a sandrs/clinton ticket ? Figure that would all but wipe the GOP out of contention no matter who gets the nod
Very little chance, I think. I don't think VP is a position in which Sanders could continue the work he likes to do--he'd either be debating on the Senate floor or be President to set the debate, I think, and not the weird figure-headish guy who usually gets to be VP. Clinton has lots of options, and if it looks like Trump's going to be the VP, one left-field option would be to choose a woman as a running mate, see if Trump would up the misogynistic rhetoric, and then try to encourage women to vote to block him. But more likely, I'd see her picking a non-controversial young Hispanic man. One of the Castro twins would be interesting.
That would be my prediction. I don't think Warren would attach herself to Clinton's wagon, and Sanders will go back to the senate with an infinitely higher profile than he enjoyed before.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Election 2016

Post by Norah »

stip wrote:out of anecdotal curiosity, how many of you, in this extremely limited and demographically inaccurate sample, know people who are just flat out excited for Clinton? The only one I know is my mom.
Yeah I know one or two.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by Green Habit »

tommymtcom wrote:What we need is a none of the above option on the ballot. I think that would easily get more votes than trump or Clinton
Has voter turnout ever been high enough in which it wouldn't win?
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21689
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Election 2016

Post by Simple Torture »

stip wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
Strat wrote:What are the chances for a sandrs/clinton ticket ? Figure that would all but wipe the GOP out of contention no matter who gets the nod
Very little chance, I think. I don't think VP is a position in which Sanders could continue the work he likes to do--he'd either be debating on the Senate floor or be President to set the debate, I think, and not the weird figure-headish guy who usually gets to be VP. Clinton has lots of options, and if it looks like Trump's going to be the VP, one left-field option would be to choose a woman as a running mate, see if Trump would up the misogynistic rhetoric, and then try to encourage women to vote to block him. But more likely, I'd see her picking a non-controversial young Hispanic man. One of the Castro twins would be interesting.
That would be my prediction. I don't think Warren would attach herself to Clinton's wagon, and Sanders will go back to the senate with an infinitely higher profile than he enjoyed before.
Choosing a Hispanic running mate--someone young, someone who could run for president in 2020** or 2024--could be part of the Dems long-term strategy of turning states like Texas and Arizona blue. It might take half a generation, but it could be done.

**Why 2020? If Clinton wins the 2016 race "by default" (that is, she's up against Trump and voters decide "anybody but Trump please"), I'm not 100% convinced she'll run for re-election in 4 years.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by stip »

Simple Torture wrote:
stip wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
Strat wrote:What are the chances for a sandrs/clinton ticket ? Figure that would all but wipe the GOP out of contention no matter who gets the nod
Very little chance, I think. I don't think VP is a position in which Sanders could continue the work he likes to do--he'd either be debating on the Senate floor or be President to set the debate, I think, and not the weird figure-headish guy who usually gets to be VP. Clinton has lots of options, and if it looks like Trump's going to be the VP, one left-field option would be to choose a woman as a running mate, see if Trump would up the misogynistic rhetoric, and then try to encourage women to vote to block him. But more likely, I'd see her picking a non-controversial young Hispanic man. One of the Castro twins would be interesting.
That would be my prediction. I don't think Warren would attach herself to Clinton's wagon, and Sanders will go back to the senate with an infinitely higher profile than he enjoyed before.
Choosing a Hispanic running mate--someone young, someone who could run for president in 2020** or 2024--could be part of the Dems long-term strategy of turning states like Texas and Arizona blue. It might take half a generation, but it could be done.

**Why 2020? If Clinton wins the 2016 race "by default" (that is, she's up against Trump and voters decide "anybody but Trump please"), I'm not 100% convinced she'll run for re-election in 4 years.
Oh god that would be ideal. that's such an important year.
nyquillyn
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5825
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by nyquillyn »

I know Julian Castro is a sexy VP pick for her, but I'm not sure it actually makes much strategic sense, particularly if she faces Trump. She'll already have the hispanic and black vote locked up if that's the case. I think the people in this thread seem to have forgotten that the average American white dude still sees Hillary as a big "liberal" simply because of her last name. She'd probably be better off picking a moderate "white guy."

But that's totally thrown out the window if she faces Rubio, particularly if he picks someone like Tim Scott as a running mate. That's a fucking nightmare for the Dems.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by Green Habit »

turned2black wrote:I know Julian Castro is a sexy VP pick for her, but I'm not sure it actually makes much strategic sense, particularly if she faces Trump. She'll already have the hispanic and black vote locked up if that's the case. I think the people in this thread seem to have forgotten that the average American white dude still sees Hillary as a big "liberal" simply because of her last name. She'd probably be better off picking a moderate "white guy."
Might as well just keep Biden in there.
User avatar
tommymtcom
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4306
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: there all is aching

Re: Election 2016

Post by tommymtcom »

Do people really put a lot of stock in who the vp nominee is? It's not like they do anything.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Election 2016

Post by Norah »

tommymtcom wrote:Do people really put a lot of stock in who the vp nominee is? It's not like they do anything.
Ask John McCain.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Election 2016

Post by spike »

stip wrote:out of anecdotal curiosity, how many of you, in this extremely limited and demographically inaccurate sample, know people who are just flat out excited for Clinton? The only one I know is my mom.
my mom, my wife, my sister, several cousins.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by Green Habit »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
tommymtcom wrote:Do people really put a lot of stock in who the vp nominee is? It's not like they do anything.
Ask John McCain.
I think I'm paraphrasing someone here: "A running mate may not win a presidential campaign, but a running mate could very easily lose it."
nyquillyn
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5825
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by nyquillyn »

turned2black wrote:Given both Clinton's and Trump's huge "dislike" numbers, VP picks will matter more than they usually do.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by Green Habit »

I enjoy saying "Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III" in a Foghorn Leghorn voice.
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25049
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: Election 2016

Post by B »

This was odd. Rep. Gabbard in Hawaii resigned from the DNC so that she could endorse Bernie.

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/congresswoma ... ie-sanders
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Election 2016

Post by verb_to_trust »

Rubio just mocked Trump's stubby fingers. "You know what they say about men w/ small hands..."

[pause, laughter]

"...you can't trust em."
Dick/Balls
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by stip »

Stay classy, Republicans
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by stip »

Hopefully this paves the way for Bernie Sanders' new 'Bitches be shopping' stump speech
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35420
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Election 2016

Post by Strat »

#makedonalddrumpfagain

User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52025
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Serious question;

I've not been paying attention the past couple of days, being sick makes me lose patience with TV, news, etc and so I don't usually follow. Tomorrow is Super Tuesday, right? Is it pretty clear that we will have both nominees after tomorrow?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
Post Reply