Boston Red Sox Thread

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21689
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Simple Torture »

numbers wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
numbers wrote:Can anyone remember the last time the subject of the Red Sox beat writers' ire wasnt a latino player? The last one I can remember was maybe Clemens in like 95.
Carl Everett, maybe?
Yeah, I think you're right.
I always thought Everett was there for longer, though, plus it was during some peak "Wow Manny is a weird man-child years," so he probably didn't get as much heat as Clemens.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

Simple Torture wrote:
numbers wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
numbers wrote:Can anyone remember the last time the subject of the Red Sox beat writers' ire wasnt a latino player? The last one I can remember was maybe Clemens in like 95.
Carl Everett, maybe?
Yeah, I think you're right.
I always thought Everett was there for longer, though, plus it was during some peak "Wow Manny is a weird man-child years," so he probably didn't get as much heat as Clemens.
Yeah he was only here 2 years I think, and the first half of the first year was incident free.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21689
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Simple Torture »

numbers wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
numbers wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
numbers wrote:Can anyone remember the last time the subject of the Red Sox beat writers' ire wasnt a latino player? The last one I can remember was maybe Clemens in like 95.
Carl Everett, maybe?
Yeah, I think you're right.
I always thought Everett was there for longer, though, plus it was during some peak "Wow Manny is a weird man-child years," so he probably didn't get as much heat as Clemens.
Yeah he was only here 2 years I think, and the first half of the first year was incident free.
He just underperformed so badly in '01 that he was run out of town pretty quickly, so things might seem amplified.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

That 01 team was disgusting.
MattA75
AnalLog
Posts: 1504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by MattA75 »

Sandoval is a fat load who probably no longer gives a shit since he has all that guaranteed money coming at him, but that just goes back to how stupid it was to sign him in the first place
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52023
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Do you guys have high hopes for Kimbrel? I'm asking for a friend.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37454
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Norah »

I expect him to be good.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52023
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

cutuphalfdead wrote:I expect him to be good.
Like, you would assign him as a keeper on your fantasy team good?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by philpritchard »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I expect him to be good.
Like, you would assign him as a keeper on your fantasy team good?
How many keeper spots do you have?
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52023
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

philpritchard wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I expect him to be good.
Like, you would assign him as a keeper on your fantasy team good?
How many keeper spots do you have?
6
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by philpritchard »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I expect him to be good.
Like, you would assign him as a keeper on your fantasy team good?
How many keeper spots do you have?
6
I guess it depends what other options you have, but there are very, very few scenarios where I would use a keeper spot on a closer.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37454
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Norah »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I expect him to be good.
Like, you would assign him as a keeper on your fantasy team good?
Absolutely not.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37454
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Norah »

philpritchard wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I expect him to be good.
Like, you would assign him as a keeper on your fantasy team good?
How many keeper spots do you have?
6
I guess it depends what other options you have, but there are very, very few scenarios where I would use a keeper spot on a closer.
You know what's better than keeping a closer? Only keeping 5 and getting to make a draft pick a round before everyone who kept 6.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52023
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I expect him to be good.
Like, you would assign him as a keeper on your fantasy team good?
How many keeper spots do you have?
6
I guess it depends what other options you have, but there are very, very few scenarios where I would use a keeper spot on a closer.
You know what's better than keeping a closer? Only keeping 5 and getting to make a draft pick a round before everyone who kept 6.
This sounds like a trap
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37454
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Norah »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I expect him to be good.
Like, you would assign him as a keeper on your fantasy team good?
How many keeper spots do you have?
6
I guess it depends what other options you have, but there are very, very few scenarios where I would use a keeper spot on a closer.
You know what's better than keeping a closer? Only keeping 5 and getting to make a draft pick a round before everyone who kept 6.
This sounds like a trap
If I had your team I'd keep Sale, Perez, and Martinez and then take the three early draft picks.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

I'm definitely keeping Donaldson, Bryant, Greinke and Strasburg. There's a couple others I'm on the fence about.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21689
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Simple Torture »

Not terribly surprising, as the Sox may spin it as injury-related, but notable: http://nesn.com/2016/03/travis-shaw-nam ... l-benched/
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by @SkitchP »

Simple Torture wrote:Not terribly surprising, as the Sox may spin it as injury-related, but notable: http://nesn.com/2016/03/travis-shaw-nam ... l-benched/

@SkitchP wrote: So you want the overweight 3B to just go ahead on DH for 2 seasons, just in time to hit his thirties, and THEN return to the field? Pandas probably got 2 usable years of defense left. Sandoval is a good hitter- but he is basicallya tick above replacement level as a DH as far as hitters go- and thats NOW. I mean hell, his OPS was a respectable .739 this year. Good, but not worth stashing at DH so he can be a defensive liability 2 years from now.
@SkitchP wrote:MLB Rankings in his Age 28 Season (*at a premium offensive position) for Panda
76 in OPS (behind guys like Trevor Plouffe and barely ahead of Martin Prado)
83 in OBP
76 in HR
115 in BB
49 in Avg


Just among 3B?
8th in Avg
13th in OPS
T-9th in HR
16th in OBP


In fact, outside of being an adorable postseason story, Pablo Sandoval kinda stinks. This is his PEAK. and he really is barely above average.
@SkitchP wrote:Panda in Fenway? Lets watch that Slugging Percentage Dip Below .400 with all those line drive doubles into the gap in PacBell (shut up) become singles off the monster.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21689
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Simple Torture »

Let us all bow down to Skitch and his prophesizing abilities.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

Simple Torture wrote:Let us all bow down to Skitch and his prophesizing abilities.
I think Chud and I both agreed with him at the time.
Post Reply