You sonuva...stip wrote:also, just to be clear, the match was extended by an hour. The winning vote arrived in that hour, and the round ended at the end of the allotted hour, not with the addition of the vote.Kaius wrote:I'm glad you said something. I have been waiting to calm down before going off on his *ss.durdencommatyler wrote:Hey Stip, why'd you lock IMT v RM with one new tie-breaking vote instead of leaving the round open until the end of the next round? Like you have for EVERY. OTHER. TIE. so far? What's that about?
In My Tree will square off against Syrio in the losers bracket.
March Madness 2016! Hail Hail wins!
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37328
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results
Yeah, wtf?durdencommatyler wrote:Hey Stip, why'd you lock IMT v RM with one new tie-breaking vote instead of leaving the round open until the end of the next round? Like you have for EVERY. OTHER. TIE. so far? What's that about?
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37328
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results
Someone had to say it.Birds in Hell wrote:And stip's the guy who thinks other people are fucking with the integrity of the tournament!
- tommymtcom
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4306
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
- Location: there all is aching
Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results
Cut Stip some slack guys. It really can't be easy for him to spend so much time organizing this every year only for his favorite songs to be eliminated one after another by songs he doesn't even see the appeal of.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
- PHATJ
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15145
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
- Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
- Location: Gigatown
Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results
"Losers bracket..."
Lolz
Lolz
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results
Since I don't know if people are fucking with me or legit can't follow the logic I'll err on the side of stupid.
In past rounds, when matches were tied, we left voting open for the duration of the next round. But in all these cases leaving a match open did not delay the tournament since we could move onto the next bracket.
Starting with the quarterfinals every song is involved in every round. This means that holding a match open has one of two consequences:
1. We delay the entire tournament for a day or two waiting for 2-3 extra people or accounts to vote (again). Imagine the bitching. I'll wait...
2. We continue with the tournament, but hold up the one match waiting on a result for a predetermined period of time. Say, increments of an hour. Why do it this way, you ask? It moves things along, gives the match waiting on contested results almost as much time as the other matches, and generally avoids sudden death, which I hate. There is no way to know who may vote in that hour, and no way to close off the results once you get the outcome you want.
3. RVM and In My Tree were given one more hour to see if a vote came in. Rather then say 'I'll leave it open until I get into work', an arbitrary and unverifiable closing time, the end of additional voting time was clearly posted.
4. In that time one more vote was cast for RVM.
5. RVM was declared the winner
In past rounds, when matches were tied, we left voting open for the duration of the next round. But in all these cases leaving a match open did not delay the tournament since we could move onto the next bracket.
Starting with the quarterfinals every song is involved in every round. This means that holding a match open has one of two consequences:
1. We delay the entire tournament for a day or two waiting for 2-3 extra people or accounts to vote (again). Imagine the bitching. I'll wait...
2. We continue with the tournament, but hold up the one match waiting on a result for a predetermined period of time. Say, increments of an hour. Why do it this way, you ask? It moves things along, gives the match waiting on contested results almost as much time as the other matches, and generally avoids sudden death, which I hate. There is no way to know who may vote in that hour, and no way to close off the results once you get the outcome you want.
3. RVM and In My Tree were given one more hour to see if a vote came in. Rather then say 'I'll leave it open until I get into work', an arbitrary and unverifiable closing time, the end of additional voting time was clearly posted.
4. In that time one more vote was cast for RVM.
- Spoiler: show
5. RVM was declared the winner
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16264
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results
I am glad that RVM won and was also only fucking with you. It's always my preference that these things should be decided quickly so everyone can move on, dragging it out isn't fun.
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results
Thanks for all you do stip.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37328
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results
this is an outrage!
- doone
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 3404
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:17 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: right there
Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results
Kaius wrote:Thanks for all you do stip.
bada wrote:Cause the two girls on the board voted for the rapey song.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results
cutuphalfdead wrote:this is an outrage!
- Spoiler: show
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
-
chewm
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4401
- Joined: Fri July 26, 2013 12:34 am
- Location: chewm
Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results
Next year I'll be campaigning for Santa God to win it all.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results
in!chewm wrote:Next year I'll be campaigning for Santa God to win it all.
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22777
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results
Ha. That was my vote. I had a feeling it would be the deciding vote. Good timing.durdencommatyler wrote:Hey Stip, why'd you lock IMT v RM with one new tie-breaking vote instead of leaving the round open until the end of the next round? Like you have for EVERY. OTHER. TIE. so far? What's that about?
Suck it, In My Tree.
(she/him/theirs)
- PHATJ
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15145
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
- Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
- Location: Gigatown
Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results
Bammer wrote:Ha. That was my vote. I had a feeling it would be the deciding vote. Good timing.durdencommatyler wrote:Hey Stip, why'd you lock IMT v RM with one new tie-breaking vote instead of leaving the round open until the end of the next round? Like you have for EVERY. OTHER. TIE. so far? What's that about?
Suck it, In My Tree.
- WaitingForBluey
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2647
- Joined: Thu March 21, 2013 1:08 am
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/homeforbed
- Location: Pennsyltucky
- Contact:
Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results
Hail Hail vs Brain of J is going to make one hell of a final
theplatypus wrote:A solo is when the guitar goes twiddly diddly
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84852
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results
Okay.stip wrote:Since I don't know if people are fucking with me or legit can't follow the logic I'll err on the side of stupid.
In past rounds, when matches were tied, we left voting open for the duration of the next round. But in all these cases leaving a match open did not delay the tournament since we could move onto the next bracket.
Starting with the quarterfinals every song is involved in every round. This means that holding a match open has one of two consequences:
1. We delay the entire tournament for a day or two waiting for 2-3 extra people or accounts to vote (again). Imagine the bitching. I'll wait...
2. We continue with the tournament, but hold up the one match waiting on a result for a predetermined period of time. Say, increments of an hour. Why do it this way, you ask? It moves things along, gives the match waiting on contested results almost as much time as the other matches, and generally avoids sudden death, which I hate. There is no way to know who may vote in that hour, and no way to close off the results once you get the outcome you want.
3. RVM and In My Tree were given one more hour to see if a vote came in. Rather then say 'I'll leave it open until I get into work', an arbitrary and unverifiable closing time, the end of additional voting time was clearly posted.
4. In that time one more vote was cast for RVM.
No other votes were cast.
- Spoiler: show
5. RVM was declared the winner
I would encourage you to drop the "through next round" nonsense and make very match, regardless of round, a more sudden death type of thing for next time.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results
durdencommatyler wrote:Okay.stip wrote:Since I don't know if people are fucking with me or legit can't follow the logic I'll err on the side of stupid.
In past rounds, when matches were tied, we left voting open for the duration of the next round. But in all these cases leaving a match open did not delay the tournament since we could move onto the next bracket.
Starting with the quarterfinals every song is involved in every round. This means that holding a match open has one of two consequences:
1. We delay the entire tournament for a day or two waiting for 2-3 extra people or accounts to vote (again). Imagine the bitching. I'll wait...
2. We continue with the tournament, but hold up the one match waiting on a result for a predetermined period of time. Say, increments of an hour. Why do it this way, you ask? It moves things along, gives the match waiting on contested results almost as much time as the other matches, and generally avoids sudden death, which I hate. There is no way to know who may vote in that hour, and no way to close off the results once you get the outcome you want.
3. RVM and In My Tree were given one more hour to see if a vote came in. Rather then say 'I'll leave it open until I get into work', an arbitrary and unverifiable closing time, the end of additional voting time was clearly posted.
4. In that time one more vote was cast for RVM.
No other votes were cast.
- Spoiler: show
5. RVM was declared the winner
I would encourage you to drop the "through next round" nonsense and make very match, regardless of round, a more sudden death type of thing for next time.
sudden death is terrible. I've always hated it, and only try to use it when absolutely necessary. All it does is award Australians who happen to be awake when I arrive at work.
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results
And you know how I feel about Australians!
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84852
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results
Okay.stip wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:Okay.stip wrote:Since I don't know if people are fucking with me or legit can't follow the logic I'll err on the side of stupid.
In past rounds, when matches were tied, we left voting open for the duration of the next round. But in all these cases leaving a match open did not delay the tournament since we could move onto the next bracket.
Starting with the quarterfinals every song is involved in every round. This means that holding a match open has one of two consequences:
1. We delay the entire tournament for a day or two waiting for 2-3 extra people or accounts to vote (again). Imagine the bitching. I'll wait...
2. We continue with the tournament, but hold up the one match waiting on a result for a predetermined period of time. Say, increments of an hour. Why do it this way, you ask? It moves things along, gives the match waiting on contested results almost as much time as the other matches, and generally avoids sudden death, which I hate. There is no way to know who may vote in that hour, and no way to close off the results once you get the outcome you want.
3. RVM and In My Tree were given one more hour to see if a vote came in. Rather then say 'I'll leave it open until I get into work', an arbitrary and unverifiable closing time, the end of additional voting time was clearly posted.
4. In that time one more vote was cast for RVM.
No other votes were cast.
- Spoiler: show
5. RVM was declared the winner
I would encourage you to drop the "through next round" nonsense and make very match, regardless of round, a more sudden death type of thing for next time.
sudden death is terrible. I've always hated it, and only try to use it when absolutely necessary. All it does is award Australians who happen to be awake when I arrive at work.
Sure. I'm just saying be consistent. Changing things up at a certain point is worse than sudden death throughout.