Election 2016

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6989
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by 4/5 »

Here's a link to the transcript of that 60 Minutes about Leadership PACs. Unfortunately, it looks like they want you to pay for a membership to be able to watch the segment.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by Green Habit »

4/5 wrote:Here's a link to the transcript of that 60 Minutes about Leadership PACs. Unfortunately, it looks like they want you to pay for a membership to be able to watch the segment.
Is it a membership to a leadership PAC?
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by stip »

tragabigzanda wrote:
tommymtcom wrote:
stip wrote:
tommymtcom wrote:
spike wrote:
stip wrote:
spike wrote:
Strat wrote:If Clinton does get the nomination, I can only assume Sanders would ultimately back her and throw his support/voters towards Clinton?
that's what he's supposed to do, but maybe he tries to run as an independent, which would be horrible.
he has said he wouldn't, and there's no reason to assume he'd go back on that
as he accumulates more and more donations...
What happens to all that money if he drops out? Who gets it?
They can use it for future runs, or donate it to charities or other parties/candidates.
Could he use it for his next senate run? What do candidates typically do with it?
Couldn't say for sure, but I don't think that would be kosher. Donations given for a particular candidacy couldn't then be allocated towards running for another position, right? Just sounds amoral.
nope, it's fine (legally anyway)
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by stip »

as 4/5 said...
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15606
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: Election 2016

Post by Chris_H_2 »

4/5 wrote:Here's a link to the transcript of that 60 Minutes about Leadership PACs. Unfortunately, it looks like they want you to pay for a membership to be able to watch the segment.
will it let me go digital, or do i have to pony up more for analogue?
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by Electromatic »

4/5 wrote:
Electromatic wrote:
4/5 wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I like how when she was asked "what if you get indicted?" she just yelled "that's not going to happen" and waited for the crowd to cheer. Holy fuck.
I mean that's a pretty bush league question, isn't it?

Students also told me that they asked Bernie how his brand of socialism is different than Castro's. If true that's also an absurd question. Neither of those questions should be dignified with a response.

why are either of those absurd questions?

Bernie has answered that question and done a good job of it on NPR several times.

Hillary and the Clinton's in general have spent quite a bit of time in the last two decades embroiled in some kind of legal struggle. She very well could be indicted... If anything you need to ask that question as a moderator. She shouted it down because it's bad PR for her, but the Clinton's do that with all the bad PR that they generate for themselves.

If a debate is going to be anything more than a commercial for a candidate, they should be asked to answer difficult questions, especially for the job for which they are applying

Personally I find it absurd that a canidate for president lives her life in such a way that she could possibly be indicted. She's a female, democrat party version of Richard Nixon.
I'm all for tough questions. "What if you're indicted?" is in my opinion not a tough question, but a loaded question. Her only possible response is that that isn't going to happen. She can't even entertain the possibility of it. So ask her if somebody who has the specter of criminal indictment hanging over them should be running for president. Or ask about the cloud of suspicion and distrust that surrounds her. Or ask about her role in these scandalous things. She wouldn't answer any of them directly because that's what politicians do, but the question would be more fair.

Ah, good points, I understand you now, and see where you were going with that.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35420
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Election 2016

Post by Strat »

lol @ ben carson supporting trump.

lol everything
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36767
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Election 2016

Post by Jorge »

This debate is like when Spike and Malice are cordial towards each other on RM. Every second is dripping with tension and anxiety, like at any moment all hell could break loose.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35966
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Election 2016

Post by spike »

theplatypus wrote:This debate is like when Spike and Malice are cordial towards each other on RM. Every second is dripping with tension and anxiety, like at any moment all hell could break loose.
which one of us is drumpf?
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29887
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Election 2016

Post by 96583UP »

Image

http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/karl-ro ... id/718467/

'he loses to her in every poll' .... but might win Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Colorado???

Those are pretty goddamn important!

SOMEBODY STOP THIS MOTHERFUCKER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

at least his wife is hot
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
nyquillyn
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5825
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by nyquillyn »

turned2black wrote:Bernie's gonna have some difficult decisions this week. Delegate-wise it's probably smarter not to give up on Florida, but perception-wise he'd do better to just focus on the midwest. Get decent size wins in Ohio (polling shows Clinton still has a big lead there, but...) and Missouri and make things close in Illinois.
I'm a little surprised to see Bernie spending so much time in Florida this week. Limiting his loss there is smart, but a victory in Ohio would be huge. He should be in the Midwest right now.
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6989
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by 4/5 »

turned2black wrote:
turned2black wrote:Bernie's gonna have some difficult decisions this week. Delegate-wise it's probably smarter not to give up on Florida, but perception-wise he'd do better to just focus on the midwest. Get decent size wins in Ohio (polling shows Clinton still has a big lead there, but...) and Missouri and make things close in Illinois.
I'm a little surprised to see Bernie spending so much time in Florida this week. Limiting his loss there is smart, but a victory in Ohio would be huge. He should be in the Midwest right now.
One of my students apparently touched his arm at a rally a couple of nights ago. His girlfriend shook hands with him. So I guess you could say things are starting to get serious.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

nyquillyn
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5825
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by nyquillyn »

Yeah, the Clinton-loving media is really taking it easy on Hillary.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillarys-ot ... 1457653794
Mrs. Clinton would have us believe that the 31,830 emails she deleted from her server pertained to yoga and weddings. And yet look at what the press has gleaned even from the few emails and foundation details that were released.

Foundation cash after Russian mining approvals. More than a dozen speeches by Bill to corporations and governments with business pending before Hillary’s State Department. Dozens more donations to the foundation from companies that were lobbying the State Department. Checks to the foundation from a Swiss bank after Secretary of State Clinton solved its IRS problem. An email to Ms. Abedin, while she was at State, asking for help winning a presidential appointment for a Clinton Foundation donor.

What else? Plenty, surely. The Clinton Foundation existed in recent years to serve as an unofficial PAC for Mrs. Clinton’s expected presidential run. And Mrs. Clinton’s job at State was designed to serve the same end. Of course the business of the two was intertwined. And here’s to betting the server was maintained to facilitate that intertwinement.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by stip »

turned2black wrote:Yeah, the Clinton-loving media is really taking it easy on Hillary.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillarys-ot ... 1457653794
Mrs. Clinton would have us believe that the 31,830 emails she deleted from her server pertained to yoga and weddings. And yet look at what the press has gleaned even from the few emails and foundation details that were released.

Foundation cash after Russian mining approvals. More than a dozen speeches by Bill to corporations and governments with business pending before Hillary’s State Department. Dozens more donations to the foundation from companies that were lobbying the State Department. Checks to the foundation from a Swiss bank after Secretary of State Clinton solved its IRS problem. An email to Ms. Abedin, while she was at State, asking for help winning a presidential appointment for a Clinton Foundation donor.

What else? Plenty, surely. The Clinton Foundation existed in recent years to serve as an unofficial PAC for Mrs. Clinton’s expected presidential run. And Mrs. Clinton’s job at State was designed to serve the same end. Of course the business of the two was intertwined. And here’s to betting the server was maintained to facilitate that intertwinement.

I don't think anyone includes the wall street journal in the Clinton loving media, t2b
nyquillyn
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5825
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by nyquillyn »

Thanks for explaining the joke.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by stip »

i love jokes!!
nyquillyn
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5825
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by nyquillyn »

Wow! Just read about Hillary praising Nancy Reagan's response to HIV/AIDS. That's about as offensive as anything Trump has said.

How could she be so fucking stupid? Like half of her "inner circle" is gay.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by Green Habit »

turned2black wrote:Wow! Just read about Hillary praising Nancy Reagan's response to HIV/AIDS. That's about as offensive as anything Trump has said.

How could she be so fucking stupid? Like half of her "inner circle" is gay.
Image
User avatar
Self
Polluted
Posts: 4663
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
Location: PM me, I have everything.

Re: Election 2016

Post by Self »

What a shit show. This is the hardest I've ever thought about getting a gun.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

Welp, this is unsettling.
Post Reply