Movie: Man Of Steel (06-14-13)

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Movie: Man Of Steel (06-14-13)

Post by McParadigm »

Apologies for errors. I'm on the family IPad.

I would have...
Spoiler: show
1. Not made the opening the busiest half-day in Kryptonian history. they have a birth, a rebellion, two fight scenes, a dragon riding scene, a quick swim over to the Matrix, resolution of the rebellion, a trial, and a volcano party in less time than it takes to read a Dr Seuss book...leaving most of the more important character points no more than a sentence or two's worth of time to be established. But the thing is, societal and environmental decay are incredibly easy to show as contextual backdrop. You can even make them seem more overwhelming by doing it that way, as opposed to slapping them in our faces with hurried and silly scripted dialog. So just give us a planet on the verge of moral and natural collapse, and focus the storytelling on Zod's desperate, misguided planning, his resultant attempts to win over Maximus to his thinking, and the Master and Commander's efforts with his ladyfriend to save their remarkably well-behaved child. Then, launch the Superpod to the backdrop of the earliest stages of an explosive rebellious war and murky reminders of grim environmental conditions. Fill in the details later with Zod's dialog and the holo-history, and we're good. Bonus: instead of seeing Master General Shannon swiftly defeated by old men and then beat up by a singer in a rock band, we are witnessing his horrible rise to power....and seeing him as much more of a threat. Later on, we can learn that Krypton failed to survive the war, and he and his most loyal took to the skies in the last remaining Buy n Large cruise ship, or something.

2. Ruined the lives of some child actors. The school scene bothered me. The moment where a young child has a massive breakdown, locks himself in a hall closet, and has to have his mom called to coax him out is a traumatic one, and it is very intimitely resolved in the movie....except why the fuck do we have a swarm of ten year old onlookers? If, for obvious reasons, either the teacher or mom (mom!!!) shooed the gossipy gawkers away, its not like Clark wouldnt still be able to still see and hear their taunts from down the hall. You gained nothing but cheese by having these oh-so concerned adults totally cool with the peer observation team sticking around.

3. Had Clark stand up for himself. Honestly, this would be such a great moment in his early journey, it's almost like they forgot to film it. He's a child, for crying out loud, with a child's sense of right and wrong. He could, for example, decide to corner the bully when no one else is around to see and teach him a lesson. Maybe the bully was picking on someone else for a change, and that's what snapped Clark's frustration. Regardless, things could then go very, very badly...maybe he almost seriously hurts the guy. Maybe there's no almost. Regardless, this incident and the resulting horror works great alongside Pa Robin Hood the Elder's mumbly fears and admonishments, and does a LOT to give weight to Muscleclark's later confusion (as well as his willingness to stop cos the hand says stop, and not save his da). It would have tied so many of the half-messages found in the first hour together. "I...I saved all those kids on the bus, and it SCARED people. I tried to stop the bully, and I almost killed him. I did nothing, and my dad died. What am I supposed to be??" Added bonus: this could make the rig scene a crucial moment and something of a revelation for him. I tried to help and I actually helped...no consequences, no accidents. Maybe Earthdad was wrong....maybe I'm gonna be a goddamn comic book.

Anyway, unless he's got that reason for hesitation at some point along the way, Russell the Crow's little speech about becoming Superman is totally unneeded. Clark's already just sort of that guy...all Rus does to help is whip out mysteriously well-fitting peejays and interrupt the soundtrack.

4. Run with that shit. When Dark Lord Shannon drops his armor near the end (presumably because it's not hindering him at all) and initiates what amounts to a very hectic pajama fight, he has just told Clark that he took his soul from him. So use that. Have him say something to the effect of "I'm going to take from you what you took from me,"(a very creepy thing to have a rapidly disrobing Michael Shanon lisp at you) and start putting humans into the mix of the fight. He's got nothing left to live for, yeah? But he wants to make Superman kill him. He wants to cost him his soul. Then, when we reach the point where he's about to fry cook that whole family, Superman howls in frustration, and then Lois swings in with a Kryptoknife off of one of the corps-suits or something and ends the villain. Leave our hero with a goddamn weakness or soft spot that isn't a fear of extreme shade or giant worldeater type stuff, please.

5. Explained less. The scientist picking up on the terraformer thing was Michael Bay level hilarious and totally unneeded. Also, the whole "what? Oh, this. Yeah, it's a spaceship. Not really made for big space travel, cos it's a spaceship, you know, but we just threw some more horsepower in it and headed for earth. In our spaceship. This." that's a world engine, and that's a spaceship. We get it. We know what they're probably for. We're not going to grumble if you lose the "I failed Science class" exposition. also, explaining all that turns "alien weird" into "human future," which is what the Kryptonian stuff looked and felt like in this movie.

6. Destroyed less. A 40% reduction of collatoral damage would still have been more than a lot of movies have, and would have made the same point. If you only destroyed fourteen buildings and showed eleven soldiers/civies dying painfully, nobody would have walked out going "What a pussy fucking movie! Money back!" How is it that people involved in making Dark Knight mistake mindlessly murderous for psychologically intense? As it is, they are so hell bent on causing adequate action movie-style damage that they have our people-loving Superman grabbing the villain from a relatively isolated area and purposefully hurling him through a crowded gas station, a parked car at a pump, and into the center of his own populated hometown. Also, he helps bring buildings down in what he knows are still-populated areas.

On that note: shows bouts of non-empathetic behavior, does not cry (even smiles a little in a weird way) when remembering his father's death, hypersensitive to certain stimuli, does not connect well with people, no body fat (clearly not eating enough...inidicative of a lack of hunger awareness)....methinks Superman has autism.

7. Made it rain, bitches. Even in Kansas, Tornado Out of Nowhere is never, ever, ever on the end of the day headlines. How did it help this scene to have it be tornado surprise, rather than a reasonable rainstorm that happened to develop bad conditions? Also, where was all that traffic from? When has there ever been that much traffic in ANY place where a believable Kevin Costner character might live? I also would have tried to find a less "you didn't mind this part because you can't count to ten" excuse for Elliot Ness to die in the 'nado (I'd still snuff him because, frankly, him looking his 28 year old teenager in the eye and holding up his hand was one of the most powerfully human moments of the entire movie). Kill him, yeah, but Hollywood needs to deal with the fact that this conversation has never ever happened:

"Ya hear about Ted? Bought it in that tornado what went through the area last week."
"Shit. Ah told him to stop leaving his goddamn dog in the car all the time."
"Yup."

8. Iron Man'd the shit out of this thing. Specifically, let Superman explore his human side a bit. The guy's lost in the emotional wilderness. Imply that he's not above conjugating some women, as he moves from town to town. Or, at least, give us more indication that he WANTS to. And I bet the dude could drink like nuts if he wanted to....at this point he's a confused young guy who doesn't know what he wants to be when earth grows up, and he's lived a life of socially isolating loneliness. Go to the bar, get drunk, show off a little...the way this movie played out, there was no journey for him to take. He was just sort of always this guy, and he had to wait for Michael Shannon to show up and his Spacedad to suit him up properly.

Also, I'd use the Iron Man cheat of having him not hide who he is at the end. Not with the flash, mind you...this isn't that kind of character. But while the glasses thing is great...it's turned into a very fun and playful chance to laugh at how silly it is that nobody figures out that person A is person B...it doesn't really fit this movie.
Last edited by McParadigm on Sat June 15, 2013 9:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Movie: Man Of Steel (06-14-13)

Post by McParadigm »

Addendum.
Spoiler: show
9. Had Zod's ship overtaxed by the distant travel. Having him just not willing to pass up a good chance for genocide was corny. It sounded to me like he would have had Clark's interest, if he'd just been willing to pick a different planet, which doesn't appear to have been asking a lot of the terraforming thing. If getting to Kal used up his fuel or something, then we get more of a sense that Clark is the one having to choose whether or not to end Krypton, rather than Zod just sort of being mean. It gives dramatic tension. Also, Shannon is great at creepy, but when you just have him yelling and doing the usual theatrical villain stuff, he sounds like revenge of retainer kid. He's actually got a pretty plausible reason for his actions...he could have been spooky calculating instead of every villain ever.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Movie: Man Of Steel (06-14-13)

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

We are going to see this in a couple of hours, really hoping its good
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Movie: Man Of Steel (06-14-13)

Post by McParadigm »

Not really a spoiler, but doesn't the headstone imply that Costner was like 33 in all those scenes with elementary school Clark?
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Peeps
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7307
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm

Re: Movie: Man Of Steel (06-14-13)

Post by Peeps »

my two biggest gripes
Spoiler: show
its the kryptonian atmosphere * lois figuring out clark kent is the alien in a matter of hours
as for the movie itself
Spoiler: show
I liked how they didnt dwell on him being raised as the first parts of the movie but did the flashback
i like they kept his powerset limited (no freeze breath or what not)
how the krypontonians had to slowly adjust to gaining their powers
i know people are saying hes not as bumbly as reeves was and then confident when he became supes but i thought he portrayed supes just fine as well as kent. lets see what happens when in the next movie he is clark kent star reporter
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Movie: Man Of Steel (06-14-13)

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

I really liked it
Spoiler: show
only thing i had any issue with was the ridiculous amount of destruction
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Movie: Man Of Steel (06-14-13)

Post by McParadigm »

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:I really liked it
Spoiler: show
only thing i had any issue with was the ridiculous amount of destruction
I do think it was an enjoyable movie, but none of the stuff above bothered you at all?
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Movie: Man Of Steel (06-14-13)

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

McParadigm wrote:
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:I really liked it
Spoiler: show
only thing i had any issue with was the ridiculous amount of destruction
I do think it was an enjoyable movie, but none of the stuff above bothered you at all?
Not on the first viewing, i just had a great time watching, we will see how i feel about some of that stuff next time i get to see it
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Movie: Man Of Steel (06-14-13)

Post by McParadigm »

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:I really liked it
Spoiler: show
only thing i had any issue with was the ridiculous amount of destruction
I do think it was an enjoyable movie, but none of the stuff above bothered you at all?
Not on the first viewing, i just had a great time watching, we will see how i feel about some of that stuff next time i get to see it
Yeah, other than a lot of the last third, I had fun. And it was a good movie...just not nearly as good or fun as it should have, and easily could have, been. I figure, if you imagine them coming to you with a particular movie before release and asking, "Should we call it a wrap on this, or can you point to some changes that you feel would be improvements?"....there'll always be some thoughts, sure, but I don't want a movie where I find myself coming up with idea after idea after idea after idea after idea after...
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Peeps
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7307
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm

Re: Movie: Man Of Steel (06-14-13)

Post by Peeps »

considering you had 2 "supermen" fighting and the worldships, i think the destruction was warranted

the perry white scenes felt forced cause it was larry
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Movie: Man Of Steel (06-14-13)

Post by McParadigm »

Peeps wrote:considering you had 2 "supermen" fighting and the worldships, i think the destruction was warranted
The problem isn't that the destruction irrationale given the circumstances...it's that it's amped up to the point of being distracting and totally unaffecting, and it makes Superman look like kind of a dickburger because he never so much as goes "wait...were there people in there? Maybe I shouldn't have just thrown you straight the fuck through." In fact, having taken part in causing some of this chaos, he even pauses to make out with Lois at the center of what is unquestionably a massive crater of immeasurable human suffering. Reducing the damage wouldn't have lessened the impact of the fight or hurt the film in any way, and it would have brought the focus back to Clark's struggle and avoided making him look a little too self-concerned and unhero-ly...so why would you be opposed to it?
Last edited by McParadigm on Sun June 16, 2013 12:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
(patriotic choking noises)
Harry Lime
Future Drummer
Posts: 2508
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:52 pm

Re: Movie: Man Of Steel (06-14-13)

Post by Harry Lime »

Yeah the movie got a little too busy at times with the destruction, but oh well.

My biggest gripe was how sporadic and jarring it was going from scene to scene. No real ebb & flow. Much like TDKR.

Everyone in it was great. My favorites were Crowe and Costner. Gee, Costner sure knows how to touch the heart.

But the best part?
Spoiler: show
Chris Cornell--"Seasons" What a random drop in! Fuck yeah!
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36493
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Movie: Man Of Steel (06-14-13)

Post by Jorge »

Harry Lime wrote:
Spoiler: show
Chris Cornell--"Seasons" What a random drop in! Fuck yeah!
Haha, I hated that.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51788
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Movie: Man Of Steel (06-14-13)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

McParadigm wrote:
Peeps wrote:considering you had 2 "supermen" fighting and the worldships, i think the destruction was warranted
The problem isn't that the destruction irrationale given the circumstances...it's that it's amped up to the point of being distracting and totally unaffecting, and it makes Superman look like kind of a dickburger because he never so much as goes "wait...were there people in there? Maybe I shouldn't have just thrown you straight the fuck through." In fact, having taken part in causing some of this chaos, he even pauses to make out with Lois at the center of what is unquestionably a massive crater of immeasurable human suffering. Reducing the damage wouldn't have lessened the impact of the fight or hurt the film in any way, and it would have brought the focus back to Clark's struggle and avoided making him look a little too self-concerned and unhero-ly...so why would you be opposed to it?
the thing that irritated me was
Spoiler: show
how upset he was after killing Zod, yet all that destruction during their fighting probably killed thousands of people. How else was he expecting to stop him?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Movie: Man Of Steel (06-14-13)

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

Anyone else get the audience clapping at the end? i rarely get to movies in the opening weekend because i hate people for the most part and i always end up around people that wanna talk during the movie or play on their phones and stuff, but the last time i was in a movie that had the audience clapping was at the very beginning of star wars episode 1
User avatar
Peeps
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7307
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm

Re: Movie: Man Of Steel (06-14-13)

Post by Peeps »

i could be wrong, but it seems like he still wasnt sure exactly how strong he is and the damage he can do, just that hes different than others, so that may be a way to explain away all that destruction
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Movie: Man Of Steel (06-14-13)

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

Peeps wrote:i could be wrong, but it seems like he still wasnt sure exactly how strong he is and the damage he can do, just that hes different than others, so that may be a way to explain away all that destruction
Spoiler: show
still wouldnt fix the fact that he felt bad for killing the bad guy but didn't seem to feel bad about all the innocent people whos deaths he had a part in
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36493
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Movie: Man Of Steel (06-14-13)

Post by Jorge »

Harry Lime wrote:My biggest gripe was how sporadic and jarring it was going from scene to scene. No real ebb & flow. Much like TDKR.
I'd be interested in seeing the shooting script. With the disjointed feeling of much of the second half, I almost get the feeling that this was a total editing hatchet job.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Movie: Man Of Steel (06-14-13)

Post by harmless »

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
Peeps wrote:i could be wrong, but it seems like he still wasnt sure exactly how strong he is and the damage he can do, just that hes different than others, so that may be a way to explain away all that destruction
Spoiler: show
still wouldnt fix the fact that he felt bad for killing the bad guy but didn't seem to feel bad about all the innocent people whos deaths he had a part in
Sounds perfectly in-line with the all-American stereotype to me.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Peeps
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7307
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm

Re: Movie: Man Of Steel (06-14-13)

Post by Peeps »

A comic book writers view



MAN OF STEEL, SINCE YOU ASKED.
BY MARK WAID
First, if you’ve come to this page just to read the blog entry, do me a favor–check out our fine, free comics offerings here at Thrillbent. I bring this up because it seems like a wasted opportunity not to. You don’t have to; I’m not posting a movie review here to link-bait, it’s just…well, it’s my blogspace, and we do good things here. Anyway.

Non-spoiler review: It’s not for me. It had some very nice moments, several I wish I’d written (and at least three I did, I’m proud to say–there was lots of BIRTHRIGHT in it), but I can’t imagine wanting to watch it again anytime soon. YMMV. It’s a good science-fiction movie, but it’s very cold. It’s not a very satisfying super-hero movie. That said, if your favorite part of SUPERMAN: THE MOVIE was Superman standing in the Fortress while Jor-El lectured him, you’re gonna love MAN OF STEEL.

Spoiler review:








Spoiler: show
At its emotional climax, at the moment of Superman’s ultimate “victory,” MAN OF STEEL broke my heart. I mean, absolutely snapped it clean in half.

I went in ready to forgive a lot. I knew we wouldn’t get much, if any, of the secret identity–“Clark Kent” as we know him, as a reporter in glasses, as in “disguised as…”, appears only in a cute nod, and I’ve said all my adult life that a Superman story without Clark Kent in it never really feels like a Superman story. But I was willing to give that a pass. And I suspected they’d front-loaded the story with so much Kryptonian backstory that it would end up being a science fiction movie, not a super-hero movie. But the music was good and the look of Kal-El , at least from the waist up, was good, and I had to suffer through four seasons of LOIS AND CLARK Superman with no spit-curl, so while I missed the ‘do, it was hardly a deal-breaker.

And I genuinely enjoyed the first two-thirds or so of the movie. Krypton was great. Zod was great. Really, there was a lot to like there. And I got my first of many proud-papa BIRTHRIGHT glows when we cut straight from the rocket’s entry to Clark as an adult, and I grinned like an idiot at the many, many other BIRTHRIGHT moments. I can’t really describe for you what it feels like to me to see evidence that I really have been lucky enough to add a few lasting elements to the Superman myth.

And I think you’d be surprised to find that I loved everything about Jonathan Kent. I loved his protectiveness, even when it made him sound like an asshole. (“Maybe.”) And I loved, loved, loved that scene where Clark didn’t save him, because Goyer did something magical–he took two moments that, individually, I would have hated and he welded them together into something amazing. Out of context, I would have hated that Clark said “You’re not my real dad,” or whatever he says right before the tornado. And out of context, I would have loathed that Clark stood by frozen with helplessness as the tornado killed Jonathan. But the reason that beat worked is because Clark had just said “You’re not my dad,” the last real words he said to Pa. Tearful Clark choosing to go against his every instinct in that last second because he had to show his father he trusted him after all, because he had to show Pa that Pa could trust him and that Clark had learned, Clark did love him–that worked for me, hugely. It was a very brave story choice, but it worked. It worked largely on the shoulders of Cavill, who sold it. It worked as a tragic rite of passage. I kinda wish I’d written that scene.

But about the time we got to the big Smallville fight, my Spider-Sense began to tingle. A lot of destruction. A lot of destruction–and Superman making absolutely no effort to take the fight, like, ONE BLOCK AWAY INTO A CORNFIELD INSTEAD OF ON MAIN STREET. Still, saving people here and there, but certainly never going out of his way to do so, and mostly just trying not to get his ass kicked. (I loved Clark Kent’s pal, Pete Ross, and not just because they cast pre-teen Mark Waid as Pete Ross.)

And then we got to The Battle of Metropolis, and I truly, genuinely started to feel nauseous at all the Disaster Porn. Minute after minute after endless minute of Some Giant Machine laying so much waste to Metropolis that it’s inconceivable that we weren’t watching millions of people die in every single shot. And what’s Superman doing while all this is going on? He’s halfway around the world, fighting an identical machine but with no one around to be directly threatened, so it’s only slightly less noticeable that thousands of innocents per second are dying gruesomely on his watch. Seriously, back in Metropolis, entire skyscrapers are toppling in slo-mo and the city is a smoking, gray ruin for miles in every direction, it’s Hiroshima, and Michael Bay and Roland Emmerich are somewhere muttering “Too far, man, too far”…but, you know, Superman buys the humans enough time to sacrifice many, many of their own lives to bomb the Giant Machine themselves and even makes it back to Metropolis in time to catch Lois from falling (again), so…yay?

And then Superman and Lois land in the three-mile-wide crater that used to be a city of eight million people, and the staff of the Planet and a couple of other bystanders stagger out of the rubble to see Superman and say, “He saved us,” and before you can say either “From what?” or “Wow, these eight are probably the only people left alive,” and somehow–inexplicably, implausibly, somehow–before Superman can be bothered to take one second to surrender one ounce of concern or assistance to the millions of Metropolitans who are without question still buried under all that rubble, dead or dying, he saunters lazily over to where General Zod is kneeling and moping, and they argue, and they squabble, and they break into the Third Big Fight, the one that broke my heart.

See, everyone else in Zod’s army has been beaten and banished, but General Zod lives and so, of course, he and Superman duke it out in what, to everyone’s credit, is the very best super-hero fight I’ve ever seen, just a marvel of spectacle. But once more–and this is where I knew we were headed someplace really awful–once more, Superman showed not the slightest split-second of concern for the people around them. Particularly in this last sequence, his utter disregard for the collateral damage was just jaw-dropping as they just kept crashing through buildings full of survivors. I’m not suggesting he stop in the middle of a super-powered brawl to save a kitten from a tree, but even Brandon Routh thought to use his heat vision on the fly to disintegrate deadly falling debris after a sonic boom. From everything shown to us from the moment he put on the suit, Superman rarely if ever bothered to give the safety and welfare of the people around him one bit of thought. Which is why the climax of that fight broke me.

Superman wins by killing Zod. By snapping his neck. And as this moment was building, as Zod was out of control and Superman was (for the first time since the fishing boat 90 minutes ago) struggling to actually save innocent victims instead of casually catching them in mid-plummet, some crazy guy in front of us was muttering “Don’t do it…don’t do it…DON’T DO IT…” and then Superman snapped Zod’s neck and that guy stood up and said in a very loud voice, “THAT’S IT, YOU LOST ME, I’M OUT,” and his girlfriend had to literally pull him back into his seat and keep him from walking out and that crazy guy was me. That crazy guy was me, and I barely even remember doing that, I had to be told afterward that I’d done that, that’s how caught up in betrayal I felt. And after the neck-snapping, even though I stuck it out, I didn’t give a damn about the rest of the movie.

As the credits rolled, I told myself I was upset because Superman doesn’t kill. Full-stop, Superman doesn’t kill. But sitting there, I broke it down some more in my head because I sensed there was more to it since Superman clearly regretted killing Zod. I had to grant that the filmmakers at least went way out of their way to put Superman in a position suggesting (but hardly conclusively proving) he had no choice (and I did love Superman’s immediate-aftermath reaction to what he’d done). I granted that they’d at least tried to present Superman with an impossible choice and, on a purely rational level, and if this had been a movie about a guy named Ultraguy, I might even have bought what he did. But after I processed all that, I realized that it wasn’t so much my uncompromising vision of Superman that made this a total-fail moment for me; it was the failed lead-up TO the moment. As Superman’s having his final one-on-one battle with Zod, show me that he’s going out of his way to save people from getting caught in the middle. SHOW ME that trying to simultaneously protect humans and beat Zod is achingly, achingly costing Superman the fight. Build to that moment of the hard choice…show me, without doubt, that Superman has no other out and do a better job of convincing me that it’s a hard decision to make, and maybe I’ll give it to you. But even if I do? It’s not a victory. Not this sad, soul-darkening, utterly sans-catharsis “triumph” that doesn’t even feel like a win so much as a stop-loss. Two and a half hours, and I never once got the sense that Superman really achieved or earned anything.

The essential part of Superman that got lost in MAN OF STEEL, the fundamental break in trust between the movie and the audience, is that we don’t just want Superman to save us; we want him to protect us. He was okay at the former, but really, really lousy at the latter. Once he puts on that suit, everyone he bothers to help along the way is pretty much an afterthought, a fly ball he might as well shag since he’s flying past anyway, so what the hell. Where Christopher Reeve won me over with his portrayal was that his Superman clearly cared about everyone. Yes, this Superman cares in the abstract–he is willing to surrender to Zod to spare us–but the vibe I kept getting was that old Charles Schulz line: “I love mankind…it’s people I can’t stand.”

Look, I know everyone involved in MAN OF STEEL went into it with the best of intentions. And trust me, there are not rivers or coastlines on this planet long enough to measure just how much I wanted to love this movie. If you don’t know me, you can’t imagine. And there were certainly things to like. But there was no triumph to it. None of Superman’s victories in this movie are in any way the kind of stand-up-and-cheer events you’d think necessary in a movie with Superman in it. Did it succeed in what it sent out to do? I think probably so. But what it set out to do, as it turns out, leaves me cold. With the exception of the first-flight beat–the smile Superman gets when he first takes to the air–it’s utterly joyless. From start to finish. Utterly. Joyless. And I just have no interest in relentless joyless from a guy who can fly.
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
Post Reply