Election 2016
- tommymtcom
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4306
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
- Location: there all is aching
Re: Election 2016
Damn, he sounds like a total Psychopath
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: Election 2016
The second block quote reads like something out of a scientology document regarding the treatment of "supressive persons".tommymtcom wrote:Damn, he sounds like a total Psychopath
- Stickman
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 10401
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
- Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Re: Election 2016
"I'll hold your wallet while you go fuck yourself"-David Letterman
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21690
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
- Dev
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7666
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:46 pm
Re: Election 2016
I have to admit, I really like this.Strat wrote: And to make creative choices, he writes: "I try to step back and remember my first shallow reaction. The day I realized it can be smart to be shallow was, for me, a deep experience."
AMAB
- Rob
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2889
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:46 am
- Location: Connecticut
Re: Election 2016
Stickman wrote:Clinton's email woes aren't over yet
I'm as big a Bernie supporter as anyone, but HA Goodman embarrasses me.
-
b_i_revisited
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Mon October 26, 2015 2:04 pm
Re: Election 2016
Rob wrote:Stickman wrote:Clinton's email woes aren't over yet
I'm as big a Bernie supporter as anyone, but HA Goodman embarrasses me.
"I explain in this CNN New Day appearance why Hillary Clinton's actions epitomize white privilege"
Really? Really?
I also find it amusing that Clinton's email were a bullshit non-issue until Bernie had a legit chance at the White House and now....
http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=1278Alex wrote:i wonder what the supermassive jackhole broken iris would have thought about this
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: Election 2016
So, how do all the pundits feel about Bernie's chances now?
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21690
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Election 2016
Should we be preparing ourselves for a Cruz candidacy? It's looking less and less likely that Trump will get to 1237 committed delegates before the convention, and the way Republican loyalists are going to pack the convention with anti-Trumpers makes it look like--unless he can convince dozens of unbound delegates to come to his side before July--there's going to be more than one ballot. This is going to be one of the more interesting political summers in a long time. A long time.
McParadigm wrote:lol
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51692
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Election 2016
FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 5:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21690
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Election 2016
I'm not so sure if there's enough targeted polling to really forecast that yet (on the other hand, there has been a lot of studying Trump's chances), but my gut--which, although it's not always right, is probably larger than your gut, so I've got that going for me--tells me that it may be the opposite. Trump's "base" isn't as traditional as Cruz's base, and Cruz might (might) be able to pull from demographics that Trump can't really touch (i.e., POC).tragabigzanda wrote:It's such a double-edged sword. I think Trump would fair much better in the general election than Cruz, yet a Cruz presidency is decidedly more terrifying than a Trump presidency.Simple Torture wrote:Should we be preparing ourselves for a Cruz candidacy? It's looking less and less likely that Trump will get to 1237 committed delegates before the convention, and the way Republican loyalists are going to pack the convention with anti-Trumpers makes it look like--unless he can convince dozens of unbound delegates to come to his side before July--there's going to be more than one ballot. This is going to be one of the more interesting political summers in a long time. A long time.
Also, The Onion continues to kill their Ted Cruz coverage:
McParadigm wrote:lol
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51692
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Election 2016
FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 5:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21690
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Election 2016
Fivethirtyeight has had a bunch of discussions about being cautious about singling out women as a "voting block" considering they make up half of the electorate. We might see one of the biggest "overall" swings ever with Clinton running, but it's not like there are pockets of the country where women tend to dominate--they're just 50% of the field overall.
How Women Leaned:
2012 Obama 55-44
2008 Obama 56-43
2004 Kerry 51-48
2000 Gore 54-44
1996 Clinton 55-38
1992 Clinton 45-38-17
1988 Bush 51-49
1984 Reagan 58-42
1980 Reagan 47-46
1976 Carter 52-48
How Women Leaned:
2012 Obama 55-44
2008 Obama 56-43
2004 Kerry 51-48
2000 Gore 54-44
1996 Clinton 55-38
1992 Clinton 45-38-17
1988 Bush 51-49
1984 Reagan 58-42
1980 Reagan 47-46
1976 Carter 52-48
McParadigm wrote:lol
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51692
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Election 2016
FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 5:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21690
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Election 2016
Well, 1984 was such a drubbing that you can almost throw it out as a statistical anomaly. '80 and '88, though, I think help prove the point that the 538 folks were making: "women" is such a diverse category (socioeconomic levels, religion, region, type of work, age, etc.) that you should probably expect it to be around 50/50 (as it basically was in '80 and '88) if there weren't any other mitigating circumstances (a candidate who's backwards on women's issues, a woman is actually running).tragabigzanda wrote:Interesting. Any idea why so many women voted for Reagan and Bush in the 80s? Were they putting the economy ahead of their uteruses (uterii?)?
McParadigm wrote:lol
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21690
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Election 2016
Notice how women have "picked" the winner every time except for 2000 (when Gore won the popular vote but lost the electoral college) and 2004 (which was only a 3-mil vote spread, but an electoral squeaker). That has less to say about women "swinging" an election and more about the fact that they're representative of the nation as a whole.
McParadigm wrote:lol
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36768
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Election 2016
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29891
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Election 2016
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- tommymtcom
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4306
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
- Location: there all is aching
Re: Election 2016
Ted Cruz winning is nothing to celebrate. The man has no soul.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21690
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Election 2016
Congrats to Sanders for knocking 16 delegates off Clinton's nearly 600-delegate lead.
McParadigm wrote:lol
