Star Wars: Episode VIII: The Last Jedi
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46229
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Days of the Future Past is probably worse, yeah.durdencommatyler wrote:That's a lot of movies!
I've seen... maybe 10? And at least a few of them were better, for sure. Sisters was not better. An Honest Liar wasn't better. X-Men: Days of Future Past CERTAINLY wasn't better. The One I Love and Hello My Name is Doris are definitely both better.
I think I said it in my SCV segment but TFA is a good (or decent) movie but it's a great Star Wars movie. But, again, that bar isn't especially high for me. Empire is really the only Star Wars movie I'd call exceptional on a cinematic level.
I still don't understand this whole "not a great movie, but a great Star Wars movie" logic. That makes no sense to me.
Because the aim is entirely different. A GREAT movie carves its own niche. Has it's own vision and own narrative (even if its a remake or reboot). This movie was aiming to recreate a feeling, to undo the sterile prequels. To reintroduce the fanbase into a "universe." Whether or not YOU felt that was successful is up for debate. For a lot of people The Force Awakens accomplished what they wanted it to do... make them feel like Star Wars was more Empire and less Clones.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46229
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Where did they state that was the aim of this movie?
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
BurtReynolds wrote:Where did they state that was the aim of this movie?
I mean the aim of those watching it. What they were hoping to get out of it. I stated that poorly. My apologies.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
I don't understanding how recapturing a feeling makes it a great Star Wars movie. That's not what the great Star Wars movies did.@SkitchP wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Days of the Future Past is probably worse, yeah.durdencommatyler wrote:That's a lot of movies!
I've seen... maybe 10? And at least a few of them were better, for sure. Sisters was not better. An Honest Liar wasn't better. X-Men: Days of Future Past CERTAINLY wasn't better. The One I Love and Hello My Name is Doris are definitely both better.
I think I said it in my SCV segment but TFA is a good (or decent) movie but it's a great Star Wars movie. But, again, that bar isn't especially high for me. Empire is really the only Star Wars movie I'd call exceptional on a cinematic level.
I still don't understand this whole "not a great movie, but a great Star Wars movie" logic. That makes no sense to me.
Because the aim is entirely different. A GREAT movie carves its own niche. Has it's own vision and own narrative (even if its a remake or reboot). This movie was aiming to recreate a feeling, to undo the sterile prequels. To reintroduce the fanbase into a "universe." Whether or not YOU felt that was successful is up for debate. For a lot of people The Force Awakens accomplished what they wanted it to do... make them feel like Star Wars was more Empire and less Clones.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I don't understanding how recapturing a feeling makes it a great Star Wars movie. That's not what the great Star Wars movies did.@SkitchP wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Days of the Future Past is probably worse, yeah.durdencommatyler wrote:That's a lot of movies!
I've seen... maybe 10? And at least a few of them were better, for sure. Sisters was not better. An Honest Liar wasn't better. X-Men: Days of Future Past CERTAINLY wasn't better. The One I Love and Hello My Name is Doris are definitely both better.
I think I said it in my SCV segment but TFA is a good (or decent) movie but it's a great Star Wars movie. But, again, that bar isn't especially high for me. Empire is really the only Star Wars movie I'd call exceptional on a cinematic level.
I still don't understand this whole "not a great movie, but a great Star Wars movie" logic. That makes no sense to me.
Because the aim is entirely different. A GREAT movie carves its own niche. Has it's own vision and own narrative (even if its a remake or reboot). This movie was aiming to recreate a feeling, to undo the sterile prequels. To reintroduce the fanbase into a "universe." Whether or not YOU felt that was successful is up for debate. For a lot of people The Force Awakens accomplished what they wanted it to do... make them feel like Star Wars was more Empire and less Clones.
Are the Star Wars movies technically great movies? Have the effects held up to still seem modern? Not at all. They just happened to strike that right balance (and frankly luck and timing) that speaks to the generation of people that demanded sequels and toys and millions of tie ins... which basically made the society, by and large, become nostalgic for what is at its core a decent movie series. The Force Awakens did a very good job of tapping into that for the masses. So there is no way to judge what a great Star Wars movie is. Either this movie gave you that feeling or it didnt... even if objectively you can say "yah, this movie isn't great"
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Rian Johnson just tweeted huge screens with Maz on them so presumably she's back to tell that story that was for another time.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- Sgt. Crackpot
- F.U.B.A.R
- Posts: 9104
- Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
- Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
- Location: Lft Craquepeau
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Aww fuck, looks like EP VIII is going to be a be a flashback episodedimejinky99 wrote:Rian Johnson just tweeted huge screens with Maz on them so presumably she's back to tell that story that was for another time.
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Yknow I wondered about that. Doesn't Looper have a few flashback sequences in it too?
If it furthers the story and works in it its fine. I'd rather see a flashback to events than have a character explaining the event.
If it furthers the story and works in it its fine. I'd rather see a flashback to events than have a character explaining the event.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
I hope everything is a flashback but Rey's training montage and the construction of a larger starkiller base
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- Sgt. Crackpot
- F.U.B.A.R
- Posts: 9104
- Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
- Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
- Location: Lft Craquepeau
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
You monster!stip wrote:I hope everything is a flashback but Rey's training montage and the construction of a larger starkiller base
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85142
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
@SkitchP wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:I don't understanding how recapturing a feeling makes it a great Star Wars movie. That's not what the great Star Wars movies did.@SkitchP wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Days of the Future Past is probably worse, yeah.durdencommatyler wrote:That's a lot of movies!
I've seen... maybe 10? And at least a few of them were better, for sure. Sisters was not better. An Honest Liar wasn't better. X-Men: Days of Future Past CERTAINLY wasn't better. The One I Love and Hello My Name is Doris are definitely both better.
I think I said it in my SCV segment but TFA is a good (or decent) movie but it's a great Star Wars movie. But, again, that bar isn't especially high for me. Empire is really the only Star Wars movie I'd call exceptional on a cinematic level.
I still don't understand this whole "not a great movie, but a great Star Wars movie" logic. That makes no sense to me.
Because the aim is entirely different. A GREAT movie carves its own niche. Has it's own vision and own narrative (even if its a remake or reboot). This movie was aiming to recreate a feeling, to undo the sterile prequels. To reintroduce the fanbase into a "universe." Whether or not YOU felt that was successful is up for debate. For a lot of people The Force Awakens accomplished what they wanted it to do... make them feel like Star Wars was more Empire and less Clones.
Are the Star Wars movies technically great movies? Have the effects held up to still seem modern? Not at all. They just happened to strike that right balance (and frankly luck and timing) that speaks to the generation of people that demanded sequels and toys and millions of tie ins... which basically made the society, by and large, become nostalgic for what is at its core a decent movie series. The Force Awakens did a very good job of tapping into that for the masses. So there is no way to judge what a great Star Wars movie is. Either this movie gave you that feeling or it didnt... even if objectively you can say "yah, this movie isn't great"
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35416
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Skitch gets it
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
I don't agree with that, for the record.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35416
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Things LV says
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85142
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
CoolLoathedVermin72 wrote:I don't agree with that, for the record.
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
I think the OT has held up pretty well, effects wise. I'm not sure i know what skitch means by whether they have help up "technically."? Like, craft wise? Execution? Performances? Editing? I would need specifics before j can choose a side here.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85142
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
The VFX for the OT hold up well because Lucas updates them every third Saturday.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
I don't really see what the effects have to do with anything
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35416
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
What?! You love Michael Bay movies and thats all his movies are!LoathedVermin72 wrote:I don't really see what the effects have to do with anything