Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply

Well

Great movie
8
20%
Good movie
16
40%
Just meh
10
25%
Marvel Universe wannabe
6
15%
 
Total votes: 40

User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85154
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Post by epilogue »

bada wrote:She annoyed me on Felicity she had it coming.
I never watched Felicity. Was it any good?
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Post by Kaius »

BvS had been carrying a lot cynical weight before anyone ever saw so much as a teaser for this movie: the Batfleck choice (based off of Daredevil I assume?), the irrelevant mocking of DC "trying to catch up with Marvel", and the purists grudge ever since Supes murdered Zod.

It faced even more plot-centric criticism when the trailers were released; which was more melodramatic bell ringing.

If your typical super hero/comic book/action-fantasy fan went into this movie with an open mind, then I cannot fathom how they came away with most of the negative criticisms I've seen. I think bada is spot on.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85154
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Post by epilogue »

Kaius wrote:BvS had been carrying a lot cynical weight before anyone ever saw so much as a teaser for this movie: the Batfleck choice (based off of Daredevil I assume?), the irrelevant mocking of DC "trying to catch up with Marvel", and the purists grudge ever since Supes murdered Zod.

It faced even more plot-centric criticism when the trailers were released; which was more melodramatic bell ringing.

If your typical super hero/comic book/action-fantasy fan went into this movie with an open mind, then I cannot fathom how they came away with most of the negative criticisms I've seen. I think bada is spot on.
Yeah, good points, K. I had kinda forgotten how skeptical people were because of "bloat" from really early on.
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12537
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Post by bada »

durdencommatyler wrote:
bada wrote:She annoyed me on Felicity she had it coming.
I never watched Felicity. Was it any good?
The media backlash when she cut her hair caused me to stop watching the show because I was weak willed and easily influenced like BvS haters.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36758
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Post by Jorge »

Kaius wrote:BvS had been carrying a lot cynical weight before anyone ever saw so much as a teaser for this movie: the Batfleck choice (based off of Daredevil I assume?), the irrelevant mocking of DC "trying to catch up with Marvel", and the purists grudge ever since Supes murdered Zod.

It faced even more plot-centric criticism when the trailers were released; which was more melodramatic bell ringing.

If your typical super hero/comic book/action-fantasy fan went into this movie with an open mind, then I cannot fathom how they came away with most of the negative criticisms I've seen. I think bada is spot on.
My Dad is one of the purest cinema-goers I know. He doesn't care about "Marvel vs. DC", doesn't follow the pre-release minutiae, doesn't read reviews, doesn't even watch trailers online. But he goes to the movies all the time because he just loves movies. He likes both Batman and Superman and wasn't expecting much out of BvS other than a good action film. He came out bored and exasperated, telling me it was a frustrating movie that was too long, too convoluted, too dour.

I agree that there's been a critical pile-on effect-- as the days went on it seemed that reviewers were trying to out-snark each other with funny ways to put down this film. But I really don't think all of the critical (and, in large part, audience) reaction can be attributed to preconceived notions and cynicism. There are integral issues regarding the film's structure, logic and coherence that are a large part of why it didn't seem to resonate with casual moviegoers. People who are okay with taking it in as a more expressionistic and maximalistic piece won't be bothered by those quirks (or problems, depending on how you look at it).
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Post by dimejinky99 »

bada wrote:Dime I'm sorry...I'm a fan of yours....but you are so into arguing with LV I don't believe for a second you didn't want this to be bad so you could troll him in response to his Star Wars hate.

Cmon. Superman is one of the first things I can remember growing up. Who didn't want this film to be awesome? I wanted to be awesome. I've no interest in having a go at him via something he likes, that's his schtick.
I really didn't like the film. At all. And it's worse cos it should and could have as easily been great. Also don't care if you believe that or not but if you want to follow your logic, I'd propose he's only defending it so much
Cos he's knows it's awful and everyone hates it and is trying to stick one up to Star Wars for whatever reason.

And I don't believe he's doing that either but let's not be mean spirited. I wasn't being. I didn't like the film. That's all
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

I believe you. I think your opinion is terrible but I believe it's genuine.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Post by dimejinky99 »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:I believe you. I think your opinion is terrible but I believe it's genuine.

In that case, Force awakens isn't a worthy response
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12537
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Post by bada »

Dime if my comment came of mean spirited I am sorry. I was just trying to start a goofy exchange.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

dimejinky99 wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I believe you. I think your opinion is terrible but I believe it's genuine.

In that case, Force awakens isn't a worthy response
Han Solo, etc.
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12537
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Post by bada »

Also obviously when I said people did this or people did that I don't mean all people. I wasn't calling Plats dad a troll. :D Its like an expression.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85154
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Post by epilogue »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I believe you. I think your opinion is terrible but I believe it's genuine.

In that case, Force awakens isn't a worthy response
Han Solo, etc.
I hope that's the actual title of the Han Solo anthology film.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I believe you. I think your opinion is terrible but I believe it's genuine.

In that case, Force awakens isn't a worthy response
Han Solo, etc.
I hope that's the actual title of the Han Solo anthology film.
It's Han Solo, Fuck You: A Star Wars Story
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85154
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Post by epilogue »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I believe you. I think your opinion is terrible but I believe it's genuine.

In that case, Force awakens isn't a worthy response
Han Solo, etc.
I hope that's the actual title of the Han Solo anthology film.
It's Han Solo, Fuck You: A Star Wars Story
Shouldn't all the S's in that title be $?
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Post by stip »

bada wrote:Also obviously when I said people did this or people did that I don't mean all people. I wasn't calling Plats dad a troll. :D Its like an expression.
when i say things like that theplatypus thinks i mean all people
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12537
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Post by bada »

theplatypus wrote:
Kaius wrote:BvS had been carrying a lot cynical weight before anyone ever saw so much as a teaser for this movie: the Batfleck choice (based off of Daredevil I assume?), the irrelevant mocking of DC "trying to catch up with Marvel", and the purists grudge ever since Supes murdered Zod.

It faced even more plot-centric criticism when the trailers were released; which was more melodramatic bell ringing.

If your typical super hero/comic book/action-fantasy fan went into this movie with an open mind, then I cannot fathom how they came away with most of the negative criticisms I've seen. I think bada is spot on.
I agree that there's been a critical pile-on effect-- as the days went on it seemed that reviewers were trying to out-snark each other with funny ways to put down this film. But I really don't think all of the critical (and, in large part, audience) reaction can be attributed to preconceived notions and cynicism. There are integral issues regarding the film's structure, logic and coherence that are a large part of why it didn't seem to resonate with casual moviegoers. People who are okay with taking it in as a more expressionistic and maximalistic piece won't be bothered by those quirks (or problems, depending on how you look at it).
I can certainly see my knowledge of the greater DC universe might fill in some gaps that your casual viewer might see as issues. I know when I watched some of the Harry Potter movies I could feel that parts of the movies were providing cues to the book readers that were lost on me.
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12537
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Post by bada »

stip wrote:
bada wrote:Also obviously when I said people did this or people did that I don't mean all people. I wasn't calling Plats dad a troll. :D Its like an expression.
when i say things like that theplatypus thinks i mean all people
Im always careful not say in my opinion so not to bother you but if I don't fully qualify every sentence someone says well my sister doesn't think that...can't win for trying.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Post by stip »

bada wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
Kaius wrote:BvS had been carrying a lot cynical weight before anyone ever saw so much as a teaser for this movie: the Batfleck choice (based off of Daredevil I assume?), the irrelevant mocking of DC "trying to catch up with Marvel", and the purists grudge ever since Supes murdered Zod.

It faced even more plot-centric criticism when the trailers were released; which was more melodramatic bell ringing.

If your typical super hero/comic book/action-fantasy fan went into this movie with an open mind, then I cannot fathom how they came away with most of the negative criticisms I've seen. I think bada is spot on.
I agree that there's been a critical pile-on effect-- as the days went on it seemed that reviewers were trying to out-snark each other with funny ways to put down this film. But I really don't think all of the critical (and, in large part, audience) reaction can be attributed to preconceived notions and cynicism. There are integral issues regarding the film's structure, logic and coherence that are a large part of why it didn't seem to resonate with casual moviegoers. People who are okay with taking it in as a more expressionistic and maximalistic piece won't be bothered by those quirks (or problems, depending on how you look at it).
I can certainly see my knowledge of the greater DC universe might fill in some gaps that your casual viewer might see as issues. I know when I watched some of the Harry Potter movies I could feel that parts of the movies were providing cues to the book readers that were lost on me.
that extra familiarity can cut both ways, though. a lot of critics on the comic side had issues because the interpretation of the characters didnt gel with their existing expectations for who the characters were, and were not persuaded by the reinterpretation
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Post by stip »

bada wrote:
stip wrote:
bada wrote:Also obviously when I said people did this or people did that I don't mean all people. I wasn't calling Plats dad a troll. :D Its like an expression.
when i say things like that theplatypus thinks i mean all people
Im always careful not say in my opinion so not to bother you but if I don't fully qualify every sentence someone says well my sister doesn't think that...can't win for trying.
nothing really bothers me but McParadigm misusing his powers and second account voting during march madness that year insignificance one
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Batman V: Superman Dawn of Justice

Post by stip »

ohhh, sleeping by myself (lbolt version) just came on
Post Reply