MLB

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22822
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: MLB

Post by Bammer »

The Argonaut wrote:It's risky because the ball could bounce away from you into the outfield, and it's only advantageous if the batter isn't running out of the box at all.
Pay close attention. I guarantee you 9 out of the next 10 times you see this play as a possibility, it will be a no brainer. Sure out at second to eliminate the faster runner. Virtually zero risk.
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
The Argonaut
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11951
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
Location: in the air tonight

Re: MLB

Post by The Argonaut »

I don't see a slower baserunner on first being worth the risk of losing the ball and having two men on.
Please consider voting for me
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22822
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: MLB

Post by Bammer »

The Argonaut wrote:I don't see a slower baserunner on first being worth the risk of losing the ball and having two men on.
You're anticipating the worst bad hop of all time.

PS - Kinsler was way too close to that ball coming down. I'd position myself back at least 5-10 feet further just in case of a bad hop.
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22822
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: MLB

Post by Bammer »

I would also pull this play on a soft line drive. I'd deliberately knock the ball down in front of me and throw to second. Chances are the runner from first has already got his momentum running back to first base and you might even be able to get a double play out of it.

That being said, much more risky and the ball would have to be hit perfectly.
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
The Argonaut
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11951
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
Location: in the air tonight

Re: MLB

Post by The Argonaut »

Or if he throws it away when tossing to second. Or the other infielder doesn't anticipate what you're doing and he flubs it. It introduces too many chances to mess up.
Please consider voting for me
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22822
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: MLB

Post by Bammer »

The Argonaut wrote:Or if he throws it away when tossing to second. Or the other infielder doesn't anticipate what you're doing and he flubs it. It introduces too many chances to mess up.
Well you gotta be on the same page withcho double play partna, bro!
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

The Argonaut wrote:Or if he throws it away when tossing to second. Or the other infielder doesn't anticipate what you're doing and he flubs it. It introduces too many chances to mess up.
Exactly. If this move wasn't super risky, everyone would do it all the time.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

I always thought the umpire was allowed to call the batter out and let the runner stay at first on that play. I feel like Alomar did it back when he played for the Jays and it was overruled by the ump because it was intentional, but maybe I'm just mis-remembering.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

Also, 11:00? What the hell is that?
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

philpritchard wrote:Also, 11:00? What the hell is that?
It's a Patriots day tradition. Canadians wouldn't understand what it's like to tell the British monarchy to fuck off.
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22822
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: MLB

Post by Bammer »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:Or if he throws it away when tossing to second. Or the other infielder doesn't anticipate what you're doing and he flubs it. It introduces too many chances to mess up.
Exactly. If this move wasn't super risky, everyone would do it all the time.
The entire premise of the infield fly rule is to prevent getting cheap outs on TWO lead runners (hell, even three under ideal circumstances). There must be something to it if they've created a rule to specifically disallow it. I'm talking about a sure fire way to get ONE cheap out.

I don't know if you knew this but there's a video of Ian Kinsler proving this works like a goddamn charm.
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

Bammer wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:Or if he throws it away when tossing to second. Or the other infielder doesn't anticipate what you're doing and he flubs it. It introduces too many chances to mess up.
Exactly. If this move wasn't super risky, everyone would do it all the time.
The entire premise of the infield fly rule is to prevent getting cheap outs on TWO lead runners (hell, even three under ideal circumstances). There must be something to it if they've created a rule to specifically disallow it. I'm talking about a sure fire way to get ONE cheap out.

I don't know if you knew this but there's a video of Ian Kinsler proving this works like a goddamn charm.
The video doesn't prove that there's no risk of the ball bouncing away, though.
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22822
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: MLB

Post by Bammer »

philpritchard wrote:
Bammer wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:Or if he throws it away when tossing to second. Or the other infielder doesn't anticipate what you're doing and he flubs it. It introduces too many chances to mess up.
Exactly. If this move wasn't super risky, everyone would do it all the time.
The entire premise of the infield fly rule is to prevent getting cheap outs on TWO lead runners (hell, even three under ideal circumstances). There must be something to it if they've created a rule to specifically disallow it. I'm talking about a sure fire way to get ONE cheap out.

I don't know if you knew this but there's a video of Ian Kinsler proving this works like a goddamn charm.
The video doesn't prove that there's no risk of the ball bouncing away, though.
I don't think you people understand how long it takes to throw a baseball 50ft versus how long it takes someone to run 90ft, even if you fumble the ball slightly. I'm talking about a can of corn pop up, not a sharp grounder.

Anyway, I rest my case based on the mere existence of the infield fly rule which clearly proves me right and you purists out there really need to start living a little.
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

Bammer wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
Bammer wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:Or if he throws it away when tossing to second. Or the other infielder doesn't anticipate what you're doing and he flubs it. It introduces too many chances to mess up.
Exactly. If this move wasn't super risky, everyone would do it all the time.
The entire premise of the infield fly rule is to prevent getting cheap outs on TWO lead runners (hell, even three under ideal circumstances). There must be something to it if they've created a rule to specifically disallow it. I'm talking about a sure fire way to get ONE cheap out.

I don't know if you knew this but there's a video of Ian Kinsler proving this works like a goddamn charm.
The video doesn't prove that there's no risk of the ball bouncing away, though.
I don't think you people understand how long it takes to throw a baseball 50ft versus how long it takes someone to run 90ft, even if you fumble the ball slightly. I'm talking about a can of corn pop up, not a sharp grounder.

Anyway, I rest my case based on the mere existence of the infield fly rule which clearly proves me right and you purists out there really need to start living a little.
Aren't chud and I kind of two of the least "purist" baseball fans on here?
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35997
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: MLB

Post by spike »

philpritchard wrote:I always thought the umpire was allowed to call the batter out and let the runner stay at first on that play. I feel like Alomar did it back when he played for the Jays and it was overruled by the ump because it was intentional, but maybe I'm just mis-remembering.
An Infield Fly is a fair fly ball (not a line drive or bunt) that, in the judgment of the umpire, can be caught by an infielder, pitcher, or catcher with ordinary effort and when there are runners on first and second or first, second, and third and less than two outs.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

spike wrote:
philpritchard wrote:I always thought the umpire was allowed to call the batter out and let the runner stay at first on that play. I feel like Alomar did it back when he played for the Jays and it was overruled by the ump because it was intentional, but maybe I'm just mis-remembering.
An Infield Fly is a fair fly ball (not a line drive or bunt) that, in the judgment of the umpire, can be caught by an infielder, pitcher, or catcher with ordinary effort and when there are runners on first and second or first, second, and third and less than two outs.
The infield fly rule wouldn't apply because it was just a runner on first.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

Rule 6.05
A batter is out when...

(l) An infielder intentionally drops a fair fly ball or line drive, with first, first and second, first and third, or first, second and third base occupied before two are out. The ball is dead and runner or runners shall return to their original base or bases;
APPROVED RULING: In this situation, the batter is not out if the infielder permits the ball to drop untouched to the ground, except when the Infield Fly rule applies.


There we go. If Kinsler let it hit his glove before it hit the ground (to make sure it didn't get away from him on a weird bounce or something) then the batter would have been out.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35997
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: MLB

Post by spike »

philpritchard wrote:
spike wrote:
philpritchard wrote:I always thought the umpire was allowed to call the batter out and let the runner stay at first on that play. I feel like Alomar did it back when he played for the Jays and it was overruled by the ump because it was intentional, but maybe I'm just mis-remembering.
An Infield Fly is a fair fly ball (not a line drive or bunt) that, in the judgment of the umpire, can be caught by an infielder, pitcher, or catcher with ordinary effort and when there are runners on first and second or first, second, and third and less than two outs.
The infield fly rule wouldn't apply because it was just a runner on first.
correct.
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22822
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: MLB

Post by Bammer »

philpritchard wrote:Rule 6.05
A batter is out when...

(l) An infielder intentionally drops a fair fly ball or line drive, with first, first and second, first and third, or first, second and third base occupied before two are out. The ball is dead and runner or runners shall return to their original base or bases;
APPROVED RULING: In this situation, the batter is not out if the infielder permits the ball to drop untouched to the ground, except when the Infield Fly rule applies.


There we go. If Kinsler let it hit his glove before it hit the ground (to make sure it didn't get away from him on a weird bounce or something) then the batter would have been out.
Ok perfect. Still works for pop flys. Not for soft liners. It's a great play.
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
philpritchard wrote:Also, 11:00? What the hell is that?
It's a Patriots day tradition. Canadians wouldn't understand what it's like to tell the British monarchy to fuck off.
This was a fantastic post.
Post Reply