MLB

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
philpritchard wrote:Also, 11:00? What the hell is that?
It's a Patriots day tradition. Canadians wouldn't understand what it's like to tell the British monarchy to fuck off.
This was a fantastic post.
It really was.
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: MLB

Post by PHATJ »

philpritchard wrote:
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
philpritchard wrote:Also, 11:00? What the hell is that?
It's a Patriots day tradition. Canadians wouldn't understand what it's like to tell the British monarchy to fuck off.
This was a fantastic post.
It really was.
:lol: That was perfect, chud.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: MLB

Post by @SkitchP »

philpritchard wrote:I always thought the umpire was allowed to call the batter out and let the runner stay at first on that play. I feel like Alomar did it back when he played for the Jays and it was overruled by the ump because it was intentional, but maybe I'm just mis-remembering.

A lot of the justifications I saw for the play being totally legal were centered around the fact that Kinsler never touched the ball. Perhaps the alomar example he did and "dropped" it?
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

@SkitchP wrote:
philpritchard wrote:I always thought the umpire was allowed to call the batter out and let the runner stay at first on that play. I feel like Alomar did it back when he played for the Jays and it was overruled by the ump because it was intentional, but maybe I'm just mis-remembering.

A lot of the justifications I saw for the play being totally legal were centered around the fact that Kinsler never touched the ball. Perhaps the alomar example he did and "dropped" it?
That's my best guess, yeah.

There's a decent chance that it never happened, too. I have a lot of baseball memories in my head... it's hard to keep them all straight sometimes.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

philpritchard wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
philpritchard wrote:I always thought the umpire was allowed to call the batter out and let the runner stay at first on that play. I feel like Alomar did it back when he played for the Jays and it was overruled by the ump because it was intentional, but maybe I'm just mis-remembering.

A lot of the justifications I saw for the play being totally legal were centered around the fact that Kinsler never touched the ball. Perhaps the alomar example he did and "dropped" it?
That's my best guess, yeah.

There's a decent chance that it never happened, too. I have a lot of baseball memories in my head... it's hard to keep them all straight sometimes.
What else do you have trouble keeping straight?
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
philpritchard wrote:I always thought the umpire was allowed to call the batter out and let the runner stay at first on that play. I feel like Alomar did it back when he played for the Jays and it was overruled by the ump because it was intentional, but maybe I'm just mis-remembering.

A lot of the justifications I saw for the play being totally legal were centered around the fact that Kinsler never touched the ball. Perhaps the alomar example he did and "dropped" it?
That's my best guess, yeah.

There's a decent chance that it never happened, too. I have a lot of baseball memories in my head... it's hard to keep them all straight sometimes.
What else do you have trouble keeping straight?
Former not-very-good Blue Jays Robert Perez and Robert Person.

Also, Robert Perez and Tomas Perez.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: MLB

Post by @SkitchP »

philpritchard wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
philpritchard wrote:I always thought the umpire was allowed to call the batter out and let the runner stay at first on that play. I feel like Alomar did it back when he played for the Jays and it was overruled by the ump because it was intentional, but maybe I'm just mis-remembering.

A lot of the justifications I saw for the play being totally legal were centered around the fact that Kinsler never touched the ball. Perhaps the alomar example he did and "dropped" it?
That's my best guess, yeah.

There's a decent chance that it never happened, too. I have a lot of baseball memories in my head... it's hard to keep them all straight sometimes.
What else do you have trouble keeping straight?
Former not-very-good Blue Jays Robert Perez and Robert Person.

Also, Robert Perez and Tomas Perez.

That's pretty racist
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

@SkitchP wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
philpritchard wrote:I always thought the umpire was allowed to call the batter out and let the runner stay at first on that play. I feel like Alomar did it back when he played for the Jays and it was overruled by the ump because it was intentional, but maybe I'm just mis-remembering.

A lot of the justifications I saw for the play being totally legal were centered around the fact that Kinsler never touched the ball. Perhaps the alomar example he did and "dropped" it?
That's my best guess, yeah.

There's a decent chance that it never happened, too. I have a lot of baseball memories in my head... it's hard to keep them all straight sometimes.
What else do you have trouble keeping straight?
Former not-very-good Blue Jays Robert Perez and Robert Person.

Also, Robert Perez and Tomas Perez.

That's pretty racist
Well, I also got the Bobby Joneses confused.
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22822
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: MLB

Post by Bammer »

philpritchard wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
philpritchard wrote:I always thought the umpire was allowed to call the batter out and let the runner stay at first on that play. I feel like Alomar did it back when he played for the Jays and it was overruled by the ump because it was intentional, but maybe I'm just mis-remembering.

A lot of the justifications I saw for the play being totally legal were centered around the fact that Kinsler never touched the ball. Perhaps the alomar example he did and "dropped" it?
That's my best guess, yeah.

There's a decent chance that it never happened, too. I have a lot of baseball memories in my head... it's hard to keep them all straight sometimes.
What else do you have trouble keeping straight?
Former not-very-good Blue Jays Robert Perez and Robert Person.

Also, Robert Perez and Tomas Perez.

That's pretty racist
Well, I also got the Bobby Joneses confused.
Image
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21707
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: MLB

Post by Simple Torture »

McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: MLB

Post by EJ »

:haha:
User avatar
Fuck You Jobu
AnalLog
Posts: 1531
Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
Location: Wrigleyville

Re: MLB

Post by Fuck You Jobu »

:haha:

Great sense of humor.

Also great nite for Chicago sports.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21707
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: MLB

Post by Simple Torture »

Is Arrieta's 11 starts between no hitters the 2nd shortest gao between no-nos? It has to be.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
CopperTom
Champion of RM
Posts: 10824
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania

Re: MLB

Post by CopperTom »

I think.
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

Simple Torture wrote:Is Arrieta's 11 starts between no hitters the 2nd shortest gao between no-nos? It has to be.
Nope. Johnny Vander Meer did it in consecutive starts in 1938.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21707
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: MLB

Post by Simple Torture »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:Is Arrieta's 11 starts between no hitters the 2nd shortest gao between no-nos? It has to be.
Nope. Johnny Vander Meer did it in consecutive starts in 1938.
...2nd shortest gap.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

Simple Torture wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:Is Arrieta's 11 starts between no hitters the 2nd shortest gao between no-nos? It has to be.
Nope. Johnny Vander Meer did it in consecutive starts in 1938.
...2nd shortest gap.
I can't read or write.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

Apparently the rest of the Jays weren't giving Chris Colabello access to their magic, undetectable Canadian steroids.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2016/04/b ... nsion.html
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21707
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: MLB

Post by Simple Torture »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:Is Arrieta's 11 starts between no hitters the 2nd shortest gao between no-nos? It has to be.
Nope. Johnny Vander Meer did it in consecutive starts in 1938.
...2nd shortest gap.
I can't read or write.
After some digging, it looks like this guy has him beat: Addie Ross through a perfect game in October 1908 and then another in April 1909 (although I'm having trouble finding game logs, so I'm not 100% sure). I'd never heard of this guy before, but his perfecto had the fewest pitches ever in a perfect game (74) and he's the all-time leader in WHIP. He died at 31 from meningitis, so that might be a reason he's sort of lost to time.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/playe ... itch.shtml

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Addie_Joss
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15615
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: MLB

Post by Chris_H_2 »

So the Cubs are pretty good.
Post Reply