Ghostbusters (2016)

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
tommymtcom
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4306
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: there all is aching

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by tommymtcom »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:I'll watch this if someone can edit out McCarthy, Jones, and the 30 minutes of bad improv Feig will leave in.
It would probably just be easier if you didn't see it.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36491
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Jorge »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:I'll watch this if someone can edit out McCarthy, Jones, and the 30 minutes of bad improv Feig will leave in.
You should do it.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

dimejinky99 wrote:We'll know which t is of they make constant nods and anks to the originals. I really got the impression it was a follow on though. Just from the way some articles wrote about it more than anything.
For example, this is on the official IMDB page:
In an October 2015 Entertainment Weekly article, Dan Aykroyd confirmed that the film's cameo appearances by the original cast have them playing different characters. This is in line with director / co-writer Paul Feig's comments before filming, in which he stated that he did not want to make a film in a universe where people were already used to seeing ghosts (such as the "original" Ghostbusters (1984) timeline).
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by VinylGuy »

Not exited at all....and its a reboot for sure.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8516
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Mecca »

theplatypus wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:We'll know which t is of they make constant nods and anks to the originals. I really got the impression it was a follow on though. Just from the way some articles wrote about it more than anything.
And the fact that Dan Aykroyd keeps referring to it as "Ghostbusters 3", and how a bunch of original cast members are making cameos (which, yeah, they could be playing other characters). I was definitely under the impression that it was a sequel.
Harold Ramis' cameo as a ghost, I'm assuming
User avatar
bune
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9359
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
Location: Washington State

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by bune »

User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by bodysnatcher »

I'll probably get high and see this. Seems to be one of the few ways to actually enjoy it.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

bodysnatcher wrote:I'll probably get high and see this. Seems to be one of the few ways to actually enjoy it.
I plan to enjoy this stone cold sober. And then I plan to enjoy it so much stone cold sober that I'll go and see it again stone cold sober. Then I'll probably buy it when it comes out and watch it 12 to 87 more times. Stone cold sober. And 66 times drunks as f*ck.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35453
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by spike »

bune wrote:
this was funny!
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Kaius »

I gotta admit, this doesn't look too bad.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21560
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Simple Torture »

Did we talk about how Ecto Cooler is coming back yet? It's all worth it.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by B »

Simple Torture wrote:Did we talk about how Ecto Cooler is coming back yet? It's all worth it.
They gonna sell it at the movie theaters or am I going to have to sneak it in?
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8516
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Mecca »

B wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:Did we talk about how Ecto Cooler is coming back yet? It's all worth it.
They gonna sell it at the movie theaters or am I going to have to sneak it in?
it doesn't have slimer on it, so whats the point?
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Strat »

Meh. Seems like its more fart humor and less dry. I dont know. whatevs
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45833
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by BurtReynolds »

i chuckled at Hemsworth. The rest look awful.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

BurtReynolds wrote:i chuckled at Hemsworth. The rest look awful.
you are the reason lena dunham is moving to canada
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35453
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by spike »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:i chuckled at Hemsworth. The rest look awful.
you are the reason lena dunham is moving to canada
please calm down
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

spike wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:i chuckled at Hemsworth. The rest look awful.
you are the reason lena dunham is moving to canada
please calm down
make me
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45833
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by BurtReynolds »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:i chuckled at Hemsworth. The rest look awful.
you are the reason lena dunham is moving to canada
to be with me?
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Strat »

Id fuck hemsworth. He's great
Post Reply