Pearl Jam albums are really frontloaded

General Pearl Jam discussion.
chewm
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4401
Joined: Fri July 26, 2013 12:34 am
Location: chewm

Re: Pearl Jam albums are really frontloaded

Post by chewm »

mikejasond wrote:Riot Act does fit it, except the falloff is dramatically quick, the first 3 tracks are the best on the album, and then everything is bland until All Or None.
The 4th track is the best one.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Pearl Jam albums are really frontloaded

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

chewm wrote:
mikejasond wrote:Riot Act does fit it, except the falloff is dramatically quick, the first 3 tracks are the best on the album, and then everything is bland until All Or None.
The 4th track is the best one.
And the 5th.
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9312
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Pearl Jam albums are really frontloaded

Post by Kevin Davis »

"Oceans," "Garden," and "Deep" are probably my three favorite songs on Ten. :(
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51788
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Pearl Jam albums are really frontloaded

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

mikejasond wrote:
Riot Act does fit it, except the falloff is dramatically quick, the first 3 tracks are the best on the album, and then everything is bland until All Or None.
What Riot Act are you listening to?!?!
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
ABNorman
The Beef
Posts: 4475
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 10:16 pm

Re: Pearl Jam albums are really frontloaded

Post by ABNorman »

Riot Act is great, if you skip everything until All or None.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Pearl Jam albums are really frontloaded

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

ABNorman wrote:Riot Act is great, if you skip everything until All or None.
what. the. fuck.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36491
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Pearl Jam albums are really frontloaded

Post by Jorge »

Hey Abby... go fuck yourself
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
tommymtcom
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4306
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: there all is aching

Re: Pearl Jam albums are really frontloaded

Post by tommymtcom »

Deep is the shit.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Pearl Jam albums are really frontloaded

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

tommymtcom wrote:Deep is the shit.
bodysnatcher post
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Pearl Jam albums are really frontloaded

Post by Kaius »

tommymtcom wrote:Deep is the shit.
Agreed. I like the early, deranged stuff.
User avatar
Brett
AnalLog
Posts: 1606
Joined: Mon January 07, 2013 5:30 pm

Re: Pearl Jam albums are really frontloaded

Post by Brett »

mikejasond wrote:How could anybody think the back half of Ten is better than the front half? Release and Porch are awesome, but Oceans, Garden, Deep feel like filler after the stellar first half which is untouchable.

But you also said Vitalogy spaces its highlights evenly throughout which is equally ridiculous. Yes, Corduroy, Better Man, Immortality are amazing tracks but they are surrounded by ridiculous nonsense like Bugs and Aye Davenita, as well as filler tracks like Satan's Bed and Whipping. Last Exit, STBC, Not For You, Tremor Christ, NothingMan is an incredible run of songs in a row, and then there are 3 more meaningful tracks across 9 more songs on the album
LV and Ruddo beat me to the punch, but I simply enjoy the run from "Jeremy" to "Deep" more than songs like "Once," "Even Flow," and "Alive."

"Song I don't like = filler" is hardly a well-thought-out argument.

Yes, there's a lot of sound experiments and half-formed thoughts on Vitalogy's second half, but they strengthen the conceptual flow of the album, and build it into a conversational stream with peaks and valleys, rather than an endless torrent. I view "Satan's Bed" and "Whipping" in the same light as "Last Exit" and "STBC"; they're all lean and snappy songs that aren't at the titanic level of "Not For You," "Tremor Christ" and "Corduroy" (though "Last Exit" is admittedly pretty damn close).
User avatar
mikejasond
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3509
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 11:12 pm

Re: Pearl Jam albums are really frontloaded

Post by mikejasond »

They're fillery because they're fairly inconsequential. Not much of interest happens in these songs. From a lyrical standpoint, from a musical standpoint, its fairly bland. They arent bad songs but they dont have as much substance as the meat of the album. I think people liking the second half more is due to being tired of hearing the hits over and over again. I don't know how somebody would think "Garden" is a better song than "Even Flow". Its a good song but its just more of the same, and not as substantial.

Whipping and Satan's Bed, are similarly inconsequential songs. They don't feel as worked on as the others. They feel less complete, or like they have less to actually say musically, lyricaly, whatever.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Pearl Jam albums are really frontloaded

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

mikejasond wrote:They're fillery because they're fairly inconsequential. Not much of interest happens in these songs. From a lyrical standpoint, from a musical standpoint, its fairly bland. They arent bad songs but they dont have as much substance as the meat of the album. I think people liking the second half more is due to being tired of hearing the hits over and over again. I don't know how somebody would think "Garden" is a better song than "Even Flow". Its a good song but its just more of the same, and not as substantial.

Whipping and Satan's Bed, are similarly inconsequential songs. They don't feel as worked on as the others. They feel less complete, or like they have less to actually say musically, lyricaly, whatever.
Those are all completely subjective opinions based on "feelings," not substance. And I disagree with all of them.
User avatar
mikejasond
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3509
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 11:12 pm

Re: Pearl Jam albums are really frontloaded

Post by mikejasond »

Its just that Whipping is a generic rock song, and Satan's Bed is a fun little ditty with lyrics that are either pleasantly cheeky or ridiculously cringe-worthy depending on your outlook, but I just don't see it as comparable to Last Exit, or STBC
User avatar
mikejasond
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3509
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 11:12 pm

Re: Pearl Jam albums are really frontloaded

Post by mikejasond »

As for "Garden" and "Deep" there's a reason those are the two songs from Ten that Pearl Jam rarely plays.
User avatar
mikejasond
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3509
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 11:12 pm

Re: Pearl Jam albums are really frontloaded

Post by mikejasond »

Oceans is a pretty nice interlude.
User avatar
Brett
AnalLog
Posts: 1606
Joined: Mon January 07, 2013 5:30 pm

Re: Pearl Jam albums are really frontloaded

Post by Brett »

mikejasond wrote:I don't know how somebody would think "Garden" is a better song than "Even Flow". Its a good song but its just more of the same, and not as substantial.
Wanna know something really mind-blowing? I've never really been a big fan of the massive songs like "Even Flow" or "Alive." Even early on, I was more drawn to "Black," "Jeremy," and "Oceans" than the megahits (although "Jeremy" at least fits that category, too, but there's always seemed to be something off-kilter about it that attracted me).
User avatar
KurtLeon
AnalLog
Posts: 1399
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 9:34 pm

Re: Pearl Jam albums are really frontloaded

Post by KurtLeon »

what the fuck is a pearl jam?
bodysnatcher wrote:Someone ban KurtLeon please
User avatar
mikejasond
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3509
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 11:12 pm

Re: Pearl Jam albums are really frontloaded

Post by mikejasond »

Brett wrote:
mikejasond wrote:I don't know how somebody would think "Garden" is a better song than "Even Flow". Its a good song but its just more of the same, and not as substantial.
Wanna know something really mind-blowing? I've never really been a big fan of the massive songs like "Even Flow" or "Alive." Even early on, I was more drawn to "Black," "Jeremy," and "Oceans" than the megahits (although "Jeremy" at least fits that category, too, but there's always seemed to be something off-kilter about it that attracted me).
Sure, I can see those, but why Garden? what is so special about Garden?
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: Pearl Jam albums are really frontloaded

Post by PHATJ »

mikejasond, you clearly have no freaking idea what a "filler" track is. I mean, Oceans, Garden, and Deep are "fillers" in your book...? Whipping and Satan's Bed too? What in the total fuck are you talking about?!? I could entertain a conversation about the relative strengths and weaknesses of both halves of PJ albums, but your arguments are nothing more than "These songs are clearly better because I like them more, the rest are just fillers". This shit is getting retarded.
Post Reply