Ghostbusters (2016)

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45834
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by BurtReynolds »

Is it a dragon ghost? Why is there a dragon ghost? Why are there ghost dragons in Ghostbusters? How did this get made?
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by B »

BurtReynolds wrote:Is it a dragon ghost? Why is there a dragon ghost? Why are there ghost dragons in Ghostbusters? How did this get made?
Why was there a Slimer? Why was there a Stay Puff'd Marshmallow Man?

That's a silly reason to criticize the film.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45834
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by BurtReynolds »

B wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Is it a dragon ghost? Why is there a dragon ghost? Why are there ghost dragons in Ghostbusters? How did this get made?
Why was there a Slimer? Why was there a Stay Puff'd Marshmallow Man?

That's a silly reason to criticize the film.
I'll criticize it however I goddamn please, thank you very much.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35453
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by spike »

so library basement scene, slimer, meeting with the mayor, and the stay puft marshmallow man. is this a scene for scene remake?
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36494
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Jorge »

But there's a crowd-surfing scene, Spike.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35453
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by spike »

theplatypus wrote:But there's a crowd-surfing scene, Spike.
that's just a hipped up version of the hotel scene
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by McParadigm »

B wrote:Why was there a Stay Puff'd Marshmallow Man?
If only the movie had explained that very thing.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35453
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by spike »

McParadigm wrote:
B wrote:Why was there a Stay Puff'd Marshmallow Man?
If only the movie had explained that very thing.
because melissa mccarthy is fat like dan aykroyd
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45834
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by BurtReynolds »

Stay Puff'd Marshmallow Man Woman. totally different thing.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by @SkitchP »

That's not Stay Puft.
Spoiler: show
Image


It's the ghost from the logo.. and his name is Rowan.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35453
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by spike »

wow, that's somehow even less inventive than rehashing stay puft.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by @SkitchP »

spike wrote:wow, that's somehow even less inventive than rehashing stay puft.

This looks so very bad.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

Mecca wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:my god that does look stunningly awful
no, im just surprised i never thought of using leslie jones to carry the dothraki across the sea
:haha: :haha: :haha: :haha:
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by VinylGuy »

Man, this is basically a remake. And it looks awful.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

Oh I'm gonna see the fuck out of this movie. :bammer:
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

durdencommatyler wrote:Oh I'm gonna see the fuck out of this movie. :bammer:
I will be doing the opposite of this
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by VinylGuy »

Ill watch it, but just for the kicks of seeing the logo in a theatre again.

Actually, i went to see the original in a theatre a last year, it was amazing.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

I'm gonna be honest.

I don't think I've ever seen the original Ghostbusters in its entirety.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Oh I'm gonna see the fuck out of this movie. :bammer:
I will be doing the opposite of this
Don't worry, pal. I'll see it twice so they don't know the difference.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:I'm gonna be honest.

I don't think I've ever seen the original Ghostbusters in its entirety.
It's an outstanding film, Jordan. I'd highly recommend watching it.
Post Reply