Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45826
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Post by BurtReynolds »

oh god it's a Wesley episode.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Post by bada »

Wesley got with the cutest girl on Star Trek. Bastard.

Image
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45826
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Post by BurtReynolds »

It was kinda weird following up a very kiddie Wesley episode with the intro to the Borg, but that one is still pretty great.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45826
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Post by BurtReynolds »

bada wrote:Wesley got with the cutest girl on Star Trek. Bastard.

Image
I bet they hugged all night.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84847
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Post by epilogue »

All that Traveler stuff with Wesley was so badass.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45826
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Post by BurtReynolds »

god Pulaski is the worst.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33834
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

BurtReynolds wrote:god Pulaski is the worst.
Yeah.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84847
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Post by epilogue »

BurtReynolds wrote:god Pulaski is the worst.
Right? Stupid studio. They should never be allowed to make creative decisions.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33834
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

durdencommatyler wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:god Pulaski is the worst.
Right? Stupid studio. They should never be allowed to make creative decisions.
I don't recall that being a studio decision. I thought it was showrunners/producers?
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45826
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Post by BurtReynolds »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:god Pulaski is the worst.
Right? Stupid studio. They should never be allowed to make creative decisions.
I don't recall that being a studio decision. I thought it was showrunners/producers?
There was some kind of backstage shenanigans going on but I've never been very clear on it.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84847
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Post by epilogue »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:god Pulaski is the worst.
Right? Stupid studio. They should never be allowed to make creative decisions.
I don't recall that being a studio decision. I thought it was showrunners/producers?
Maybe. I thought it was Roddenberry and the Producers who didn't like the direction the character was moving in, they chose to replace her. Patrick Stewart was pissed. They realized their mistake and brought her back for S2.

By Studio I meant Producers.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33834
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:god Pulaski is the worst.
Right? Stupid studio. They should never be allowed to make creative decisions.
I don't recall that being a studio decision. I thought it was showrunners/producers?
Maybe. I thought it was Roddenberry and the Producers who didn't like the direction the character was moving in, they chose to replace her. Patrick Stewart was pissed. They realized their mistake and brought her back for S2.

By Studio I meant Producers.
Man I wish Roddenberry were around today. :(
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84847
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Post by epilogue »

I found this on some random message board just now:
Another explanation arises from an April/May 1994 story published in Star Trek the Official Fan Club Magazine. The story claims that McFadden attempted to renegotiate her contract at the end of The Next Generation’s first season. Although this may be a reasonable ploy for an actor on a hit series, Paramount refused to meet her demands and removed her from the program. The article also claims that when McFadden returned to Star Trek, it was at a lower salary than the rest of her co-stars.
Read more: http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread ... z49bjWxW9k
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33834
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

durdencommatyler wrote:I found this on some random message board just now:
Another explanation arises from an April/May 1994 story published in Star Trek the Official Fan Club Magazine. The story claims that McFadden attempted to renegotiate her contract at the end of The Next Generation’s first season. Although this may be a reasonable ploy for an actor on a hit series, Paramount refused to meet her demands and removed her from the program. The article also claims that when McFadden returned to Star Trek, it was at a lower salary than the rest of her co-stars.
Read more: http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread ... z49bjWxW9k
Ah okay, that does sound familiar now, actually.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84847
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Post by epilogue »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:god Pulaski is the worst.
Right? Stupid studio. They should never be allowed to make creative decisions.
I don't recall that being a studio decision. I thought it was showrunners/producers?
Maybe. I thought it was Roddenberry and the Producers who didn't like the direction the character was moving in, they chose to replace her. Patrick Stewart was pissed. They realized their mistake and brought her back for S2.

By Studio I meant Producers.
Man I wish Roddenberry were around today. :(
Me too.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33834
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:god Pulaski is the worst.
Right? Stupid studio. They should never be allowed to make creative decisions.
I don't recall that being a studio decision. I thought it was showrunners/producers?
Maybe. I thought it was Roddenberry and the Producers who didn't like the direction the character was moving in, they chose to replace her. Patrick Stewart was pissed. They realized their mistake and brought her back for S2.

By Studio I meant Producers.
Man I wish Roddenberry were around today. :(
Me too.
His mind turned me into an optimist. I wanna find that again.
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Post by bada »

They tried to set Pulaski up as Bones to Data's Spock. There were a few episodes were it worked.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33834
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

bada wrote:They tried to set Pulaski up as Bones to Data's Spock. There were a few episodes were it worked.
You think so? I always found her insufferably shrill, almost mean, even. Icy. Bones had a red-blooded passion and warmth that made him endearing.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33834
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

That's actually interesting, now that I think about it: Data never had any great foil on the crew like Spock did with Bones because of Roddenberry's mandate that no one be hot-headed or adversarial.
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Live Long and Prosper; the Trek Thread

Post by bada »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
bada wrote:They tried to set Pulaski up as Bones to Data's Spock. There were a few episodes were it worked.
You think so? I always found her insufferably shrill, almost mean, even. Icy. Bones had a red-blooded passion and warmth that made him endearing.
The character wasn't anywhere as good as Bones but I think that was the intention...and yes she was really mean to Data.
Post Reply