Yescutuphalfdead wrote:In the book,Simple Torture wrote:To expand: so, basically, it seems like Bran can tap into the Weirwood "network" and see/experience anything that the trees have seen, but he's gotta be at one in order to log on.Simple Torture wrote:We talked about this a few pages back, and the latter seems more likely. The prevailing theory is that the Children carved faces into the Weirwoods so they could keep an eye on the First Men, and most of the trees were cut down by the Andals to prevent this (or, if they didn't know about the power, than simply because they followed the Seven).Chris_H_2 wrote:is bran able to time travel whenever or only we he touches the roots from that tree? i seems to me to be the latter.
- Spoiler: show
HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
- Zantac Junkie
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:13 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85161
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
cutuphalfdead wrote:Fuck posting from my phone.durdencommatyler wrote:Maybe in the Swedish version.cutuphalfdead wrote:In the book,Simple Torture wrote:To expand: so, basically, it seems like Bran can tap into the Weirwood "network" and see/experience anything that the trees have seen, but he's gotta be at one in order to log on.Simple Torture wrote:We talked about this a few pages back, and the latter seems more likely. The prevailing theory is that the Children carved faces into the Weirwoods so they could keep an eye on the First Men, and most of the trees were cut down by the Andals to prevent this (or, if they didn't know about the power, than simply because they followed the Seven).Chris_H_2 wrote:is bran able to time travel whenever or only we he touches the roots from that tree? i seems to me to be the latter.
- Spoiler: show
It's all good. I was feeling bratty. But I think the answer is yes.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85161
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Zantac Junkie confirmed. 
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22817
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Dude.spike wrote:that's almost hodor. hodor is coming.
(she/him/theirs)
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35969
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
and going.Bammer wrote:Dude.spike wrote:that's almost hodor. hodor is coming.
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21690
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Have we talked about the Alt Shift X recap and theory videos? They're generally great, but I won't link directly to them here since some are a bit spoiler-y if you're not a book reader. Head over to the YouTube channel if you're interested. I recommend the White Walker episode, all the recaps, and the Varys episode.
McParadigm wrote:lol
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37456
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Never heard of this.Simple Torture wrote:Have we talked about the Alt Shift X recap and theory videos? They're generally great, but I won't link directly to them here since some are a bit spoiler-y if you're not a book reader. Head over to the YouTube channel if you're interested. I recommend the White Walker episode, all the recaps, and the Varys episode.
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21690
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Well worth your time. Most videos are between 15 and 20 minutes and most of the theories aren't crackpot (he does have a Euron=Daario video, which I haven't watched; and there's another joke video about Ser Pounce being Azor Ahai).cutuphalfdead wrote:Never heard of this.Simple Torture wrote:Have we talked about the Alt Shift X recap and theory videos? They're generally great, but I won't link directly to them here since some are a bit spoiler-y if you're not a book reader. Head over to the YouTube channel if you're interested. I recommend the White Walker episode, all the recaps, and the Varys episode.
McParadigm wrote:lol
- AndySlash
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2568
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:42 am
- Location: Minneapolis
- Dev
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7667
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:46 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
woahcutuphalfdead wrote:This is single timeline time travel. So anything that Bran goes back and changes, we've already seen the effects of. This also implies that everything in this world is predestined, since past present and future exist simultaneously.
AMAB
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21690
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
I had sort of a shitty day, but at least Game of Thrones is on tonight, and since they killed Hodor last week, they can't* kill him again.
- Spoiler: show
McParadigm wrote:lol
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21690
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
I was most excited for the brief, brief flashback we got to the Mad King this week (besides the fact that Walder Frey is back--I love that guy). This was a sneaky-important Jaime episode, I think: there was a 1/8 of a second clip of him literally sitting on the Iron Throne; he was embarrassed in front of the whole realm, basically; he lost his last remaining son (figuratively, not literally, but it probably stings like the others); and he lost his position in the Kingsguard. His last scene there with Cersei was pointing to something that a lot of people have been speculating about, and I'm all aboard this train now:
- Spoiler: show
McParadigm wrote:lol
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21690
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Really looking forward to some nerd's frame-by-frame analysis of Bran's visions come tomorrow morning.
McParadigm wrote:lol
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85161
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
True love is waiting to watch Game of Thrones until your significant other gets home from work.
- The Argonaut
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11945
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
- Location: in the air tonight
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
That's not true love. That's just basic relationship etiquette 101.durdencommatyler wrote:True love is waiting to watch Game of Thrones until your significant other gets home from work.
So Arya's men with no faces are basically just contract killers? Have we known that all along? I thought they had a more justice-oriented vigilante thing going. Pretty lame use of their powers if all they are is contract killers.
Please consider voting for me
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37456
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
I think they're both, sort of.
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8622
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Simple Torture wrote:Really looking forward to some nerd's frame-by-frame analysis of Bran's visions come tomorrow morning.
- Spoiler: show
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21690
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
As chud said, I think they're both. There's a lot that's still vague about the FM, most notably the "price" people pay for their services. Sure, I'm sure some people pay gold--in the books, it's implied that Euron Greyjoy doesn't directly kill his brother, but that he hires a FM to do it, and he could've afforded to give them booty from his voyages--but I imagine that's not always the case. Do we really think the young actress could have afforded a price that usually only royals can ante up? I imagine there's always a "karmic" price you can pay as well, whether it's promising yourself to their cause or providing information or something like that.The Argonaut wrote:That's not true love. That's just basic relationship etiquette 101.durdencommatyler wrote:True love is waiting to watch Game of Thrones until your significant other gets home from work.
So Arya's men with no faces are basically just contract killers? Have we known that all along? I thought they had a more justice-oriented vigilante thing going. Pretty lame use of their powers if all they are is contract killers.
McParadigm wrote:lol
- lowlight79
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2083
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:04 pm
- Location: Heathrow, FL
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
I don't see this happening,Simple Torture wrote:I was most excited for the brief, brief flashback we got to the Mad King this week (besides the fact that Walder Frey is back--I love that guy). This was a sneaky-important Jaime episode, I think: there was a 1/8 of a second clip of him literally sitting on the Iron Throne; he was embarrassed in front of the whole realm, basically; he lost his last remaining son (figuratively, not literally, but it probably stings like the others); and he lost his position in the Kingsguard. His last scene there with Cersei was pointing to something that a lot of people have been speculating about, and I'm all aboard this train now:
- Spoiler: show
- Spoiler: show
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22817
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Tits like that and you think money has to be involved?Simple Torture wrote:Do we really think the young actress could have afforded a price that usually only royals can ante up?
- Spoiler: show
(she/him/theirs)

