
Boston Red Sox Thread
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37454
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Was in the skipper's office today.


- Self
- Polluted
- Posts: 4663
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
- Location: PM me, I have everything.
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21689
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
So what would you do with Buccholz? News now is that he's going to the bullpen, but...why? I'd be fine with DFAing him or even an outright release. He's going to be 32 in August, and he doesn't strike me as a guy who's going to go through a mid-30s renaissance. We've got a club option for next year so, at the very least, I don't think they'll pick that up.
McParadigm wrote:lol
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I can't believe I'm saying this, but Buchholz is a better option than Owens or anyone else they have right now. I'm ok with keeping him around until the end of the season if someone goes down.Simple Torture wrote:So what would you do with Buccholz? News now is that he's going to the bullpen, but...why? I'd be fine with DFAing him or even an outright release. He's going to be 32 in August, and he doesn't strike me as a guy who's going to go through a mid-30s renaissance. We've got a club option for next year so, at the very least, I don't think they'll pick that up.
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21689
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I see the value in that--if someone else in the rotation gets hurt (knocks on everything wooden in the room), he is the best option. But as Remy just said on the broadcast: where is he going to get innings? He can throw bullpen sessions to stay loose, but he's gonna be out of his rhythm very soon. He's also going to take up a roster spot. Going onto the DL with "shoulder soreness" probably would've been the best conservative move.numbers wrote:I can't believe I'm saying this, but Buchholz is a better option than Owens or anyone else they have right now. I'm ok with keeping him around until the end of the season if someone goes down.Simple Torture wrote:So what would you do with Buccholz? News now is that he's going to the bullpen, but...why? I'd be fine with DFAing him or even an outright release. He's going to be 32 in August, and he doesn't strike me as a guy who's going to go through a mid-30s renaissance. We've got a club option for next year so, at the very least, I don't think they'll pick that up.
McParadigm wrote:lol
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37454
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Umpiring is hard.
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Yeah, the Red Sox and their long history of getting screwed over by the umps.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
philpritchard wrote:Yeah, the Red Sox and their long history of getting screwed over by the umps.
lol
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Mookie Betts. Xander Bogaerts. Jackie Bradley, Jr. Would you sell high on any of these guys right now to get the pitching we desperately need?
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37454
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Probably not. Maybe JBJ.Coach wrote:Mookie Betts. Xander Bogaerts. Jackie Bradley, Jr. Would you sell high on any of these guys right now to get the pitching we desperately need?
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Yeah, if someone thinks Bradley is going to keep being this good and is willing to pay the equivalent price, you trade him in a heartbeat.cutuphalfdead wrote:Probably not. Maybe JBJ.Coach wrote:Mookie Betts. Xander Bogaerts. Jackie Bradley, Jr. Would you sell high on any of these guys right now to get the pitching we desperately need?
If someone things Betts or Bogaerts is going to keep being this good... they're probably right.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37454
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Exactly.philpritchard wrote:Yeah, if someone thinks Bradley is going to keep being this good and is willing to pay the equivalent price, you trade him in a heartbeat.cutuphalfdead wrote:Probably not. Maybe JBJ.Coach wrote:Mookie Betts. Xander Bogaerts. Jackie Bradley, Jr. Would you sell high on any of these guys right now to get the pitching we desperately need?
If someone things Betts or Bogaerts is going to keep being this good... they're probably right.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I was advocating selling high on Bradley in the offseason, his value has only increased since.cutuphalfdead wrote:Exactly.philpritchard wrote:Yeah, if someone thinks Bradley is going to keep being this good and is willing to pay the equivalent price, you trade him in a heartbeat.cutuphalfdead wrote:Probably not. Maybe JBJ.Coach wrote:Mookie Betts. Xander Bogaerts. Jackie Bradley, Jr. Would you sell high on any of these guys right now to get the pitching we desperately need?
If someone things Betts or Bogaerts is going to keep being this good... they're probably right.
-
MattA75
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Maybe Bradley...you'd be insane to trade either of the other two...and even for Bradley I'd want only something really high end in return, with similar youth (and if that means we have to add in someone like Swihart, so be it)Coach wrote:Mookie Betts. Xander Bogaerts. Jackie Bradley, Jr. Would you sell high on any of these guys right now to get the pitching we desperately need?
The only other guy in the system I don't want to touch is Benintendi
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I agree with you guys. Also, Bradley is represented by Boras, as is Xander. I can't see them keeping all three and the team really needs pitching for any playoff run.
Heard this stat from Sean McAdam this AM: During the road trip, the Sox averaged 7 1/2 runs in each defeat. Ridiculous.
Heard this stat from Sean McAdam this AM: During the road trip, the Sox averaged 7 1/2 runs in each defeat. Ridiculous.
-
MattA75
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
They need at least one starter and one more bullpen arm...and honestly, they could really use two bullpen arms, because I'm not trusting Koji at all, even if we do get one more arm to replace Smith.Coach wrote:I agree with you guys. Also, Bradley is represented by Boras, as is Xander. I can't see them keeping all three and the team really needs pitching for any playoff run.
Heard this stat from Sean McAdam this AM: During the road trip, the Sox averaged 7 1/2 runs in each defeat. Ridiculous.
Never thought I'd say it, but I'd be ok with them trading for Shields at this point...as long as they can unload a bad contract and don't have to include any real prospect of value.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37454
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I'm not sure what you'd give for him then.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Why would SD trade him if you were unloading a bad contract on them and not giving them a prospect of value? They aren't getting salary relief or a roster improvement.MattA75 wrote:They need at least one starter and one more bullpen arm...and honestly, they could really use two bullpen arms, because I'm not trusting Koji at all, even if we do get one more arm to replace Smith.Coach wrote:I agree with you guys. Also, Bradley is represented by Boras, as is Xander. I can't see them keeping all three and the team really needs pitching for any playoff run.
Heard this stat from Sean McAdam this AM: During the road trip, the Sox averaged 7 1/2 runs in each defeat. Ridiculous.
Never thought I'd say it, but I'd be ok with them trading for Shields at this point...as long as they can unload a bad contract and don't have to include any real prospect of value.
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21689
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Maybe trade one of the catchers?