Election 2016

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36770
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Election 2016

Post by Jorge »

Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46240
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Election 2016

Post by BurtReynolds »

Fascists calling fascists fascist.

These morons are a gift to Trump.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46240
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Election 2016

Post by BurtReynolds »

tommymtcom wrote:Image
where may I purchase this wonderful work of art?
RM's resident disinformation expert.
b_i_revisited
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 299
Joined: Mon October 26, 2015 2:04 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by b_i_revisited »

theplatypus wrote:on anti-Trump violence
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_ ... scist.html
Good stuff.
To cite intentions and not actions as justification for violence against Trump supporters is to embrace the logic of even worse beliefs and actors.
If only this sentence was mandatory reading for all the hashtag activists out there... because there are plenty of other groups that could swapped in for "Trump supporters".
Alex wrote:i wonder what the supermassive jackhole broken iris would have thought about this
http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=1278
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Election 2016

Post by dimejinky99 »

this is wonderful. Jon Stewart on Trump. Taking him apart.

Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
darth_vedder
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6467
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by darth_vedder »

I've got a bad feeling about this.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29891
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Election 2016

Post by 96583UP »

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/5/26 ... Plummet-59

maybe there will be another bankruptcy up his alley
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Election 2016

Post by dimejinky99 »

AP saying Clintons got the numbers.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
matt reeder
AnalLog
Posts: 1509
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:34 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by matt reeder »

dimejinky99 wrote:AP saying Clintons got the numbers.
They're working overtime to try and prevent an embarrassing series of losses tomorrow in North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, New Mexico and perhaps California.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46240
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Election 2016

Post by BurtReynolds »

superdemocracy
RM's resident disinformation expert.
simple schoolboy
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5934
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am

Re: Election 2016

Post by simple schoolboy »

Im happy to have a campaign sign up for a local election just 3 houses down from the polling place. #electioneering
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Election 2016

Post by dimejinky99 »

On polling day here it's illegal to have any posters or campaign related staff within 100 yards of the polling station
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21690
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Election 2016

Post by Simple Torture »

Image
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by Green Habit »

dimejinky99 wrote:On polling day here it's illegal to have any posters or campaign related staff within 100 yards of the polling station
That would be a blatant violation of the First Amendment here.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by Green Habit »

So now I'm reading about Sherrod Brown as a VP candidate for Clinton. Why do people keep trying to suggest Democratic senators that would get replaced by Republican governors?
User avatar
Brett
AnalLog
Posts: 1607
Joined: Mon January 07, 2013 5:30 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by Brett »

Green Habit wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:On polling day here it's illegal to have any posters or campaign related staff within 100 yards of the polling station
That would be a blatant violation of the First Amendment here.
Well...:http://www.nass.org/component/docman/?t ... d&gid=1347
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35420
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Election 2016

Post by Strat »

:shake:

"I disavow those comments," Ryan said.
Pressed on whether he regretted his own endorsement of Trump that came last week, Ryan added, "I regret those comments he made."
"It's absolutely unacceptable," Ryan said. But he stood by by his support for the controversial business mogul. "Do I think Hillary Clinton is the answer? No I do not."

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/07/politics/ ... index.html
User avatar
CopperTom
Champion of RM
Posts: 10823
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania

Re: Election 2016

Post by CopperTom »

Green Habit wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:On polling day here it's illegal to have any posters or campaign related staff within 100 yards of the polling station
That would be a blatant violation of the First Amendment here.
Not really. Rules like this exist in the states.
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36770
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Election 2016

Post by Jorge »

Paul Ryan looks a lot like Argo
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by Green Habit »

Brett wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:On polling day here it's illegal to have any posters or campaign related staff within 100 yards of the polling station
That would be a blatant violation of the First Amendment here.
Well...:http://www.nass.org/component/docman/?t ... d&gid=1347
I don't know if all those would survive a challenge in the courts. Certainly it could be regulated directly on the property of the polling place, and impeding ingress into the the polling place is obviously not allowed. But if the "within x feet/yards" encloses public places that aren't needed to be used by the polling stations, I think that's a real troublesome infringement of freedom of expression.
Post Reply