Exactly. The guy reportedly called 911 to declare his allegiance to ISIS. But targeting a gay nightclub is no coincidence either.
Well if you watch this clip, you will see it's being hijacked to make it an IS attack by a Muslim. Not an attack on the LGBT. This campaigner is getting interviewed and actually walks off the set cos the two anchors bullshit http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2016/06/13/ow ... bic-video/
Exactly. The guy reportedly called 911 to declare his allegiance to ISIS. But targeting a gay nightclub is no coincidence either.
Well if you watch this clip, you will see it's being hijacked to make it an IS attack by a Muslim. Not an attack on the LGBT. This campaigner is getting interviewed and actually walks off the set cos the two anchors bullshit http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2016/06/13/ow ... bic-video/
Of course it was an attack on gay people, but again, dime it can be both. ISIS is anti-gay.
Exactly. The guy reportedly called 911 to declare his allegiance to ISIS. But targeting a gay nightclub is no coincidence either.
Well if you watch this clip, you will see it's being hijacked to make it an IS attack by a Muslim. Not an attack on the LGBT. This campaigner is getting interviewed and actually walks off the set cos the two anchors bullshit http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2016/06/13/ow ... bic-video/
Of course it was an attack on gay people, but again, dime it can be both. ISIS is anti-gay.
I understand. But this guy wasn't an ISIS operative.
Exactly. The guy reportedly called 911 to declare his allegiance to ISIS. But targeting a gay nightclub is no coincidence either.
Well if you watch this clip, you will see it's being hijacked to make it an IS attack by a Muslim. Not an attack on the LGBT. This campaigner is getting interviewed and actually walks off the set cos the two anchors bullshit http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2016/06/13/ow ... bic-video/
Of course it was an attack on gay people, but again, dime it can be both. ISIS is anti-gay.
I understand. But this guy wasn't an ISIS operative.
Exactly. The guy reportedly called 911 to declare his allegiance to ISIS. But targeting a gay nightclub is no coincidence either.
Well if you watch this clip, you will see it's being hijacked to make it an IS attack by a Muslim. Not an attack on the LGBT. This campaigner is getting interviewed and actually walks off the set cos the two anchors bullshit http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2016/06/13/ow ... bic-video/
Of course it was an attack on gay people, but again, dime it can be both. ISIS is anti-gay.
I understand. But this guy wasn't an ISIS operative.
Sounds like in his mind, he was.
It sounds like ISIS is kind of like Anonymous in that they can take credit for anything and anyone can just decide they're a member
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
It was clearly radical Islam related, and his daddy was a huge taliban supporter. Trying to make it solely a gun control issue, especially after what happened in France, is moronic.
BurtReynolds wrote:It was clearly radical Islam related, and his daddy was a huge taliban supporter. Trying to make it solely a gun control issue, especially after what happened in France, is moronic.
BurtReynolds wrote:It was clearly radical Islam related, and his daddy was a huge taliban supporter. Trying to make it solely a gun control issue, especially after what happened in France, is moronic.
BurtReynolds wrote:It was clearly radical Islam related, and his daddy was a huge taliban supporter. Trying to make it solely a gun control issue, especially after what happened in France, is moronic.
Right yes but the systems in place that failed here and the lessons that can most immediately be gleaned from it have to do with gun control. It makes perfect sense to bring these issues to the forefront of the national conversation because there are things that can be done to fix it, not just angry fist-shaking
Last edited by Jorge on Mon June 13, 2016 4:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
BurtReynolds wrote:It was clearly radical Islam related, and his daddy was a huge taliban supporter. Trying to make it solely a gun control issue, especially after what happened in France, is moronic.
Burt
Strat
I dont think anybody is stating this is soley a gun control issue, but as trag noted above, it is a very important and immediate thing that can be taken care of. how was this guy able to go in and buy such a weapon after being on the FBI watch list? because NRA and america. fuck yea
Strat wrote:
I dont think anybody is stating this is soley a gun control issue, but as trag noted above, it is a very important and immediate thing that can be taken care of. how was this guy able to go in and buy such a weapon after being on the FBI watch list? because NRA and america. fuck yea
To be fair there are people saying this has nothing to do with Islam which feels a bit disingenuous at best
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
Strat wrote:
I dont think anybody is stating this is soley a gun control issue, but as trag noted above, it is a very important and immediate thing that can be taken care of. how was this guy able to go in and buy such a weapon after being on the FBI watch list? because NRA and america. fuck yea
To be fair there are people saying this has nothing to do with Islam which feels a bit disingenuous at best
The NRA are fucking master manipulators. Its angering that "we need to talk about gun control" and "common sense gun laws" is filtered towards the rednecks as "OBAMA IS COMING TO TAKE YER GUNS FUCK YOU WOOO!"
Strat wrote:
I dont think anybody is stating this is soley a gun control issue, but as trag noted above, it is a very important and immediate thing that can be taken care of. how was this guy able to go in and buy such a weapon after being on the FBI watch list? because NRA and america. fuck yea
To be fair there are people saying this has nothing to do with Islam which feels a bit disingenuous at best