Election 2016
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Election 2016
I also think that Paul Ryan could have traded a moment of minor political upheaval for a lifetime of reputation as The Man Who Stood Up for Conservatism, and gained inmeasurably by it, and instead he shrugged and gave his endorsement like a good sheep.
(patriotic choking noises)
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51692
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Election 2016
FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 5:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Election 2016
Honestly though, I'm counting on total societal collapse related to global warming, mass social unrest, and nuclear conflicts over dwindling resources to ensure that my rotting corpse is left abandoned to be torn apart by wild, radiation-swollen animal-monsters.
So things are going well for me this election cycle.
So things are going well for me this election cycle.
(patriotic choking noises)
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46240
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: Election 2016
I only wish you guys would survive long enough to realize the preppers were right.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51692
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Election 2016
FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 5:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29891
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Election 2016
i don't think he'll backpedaltragabigzanda wrote:Yea, I think he really shot himself in the foot here. There's still time for him to backpedal, but not for much longer.McParadigm wrote:I also think that Paul Ryan could have traded a moment of minor political upheaval for a lifetime of reputation as The Man Who Stood Up for Conservatism, and gained inmeasurably by it, and instead he shrugged and gave his endorsement like a good sheep.
although Ryan likely despises Trump he will need to appeal to Trump's supporters for his own forthcoming failed presidential nomination
i hope that a few years from now we just look back at this for what it is - Trump's nomination is burst of maggots exploding from a dead animal's carcass and the marker post that a once live and functioning creature has disintegrated
years of hubris, manipulation, and lack of decency has left the republican party with a horde of incoherent feral animals to call their voter base
and it will lead to no organized political gains
but probably some stabbings or shootings
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- Stickman
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 10402
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
- Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Re: Election 2016
"I'll hold your wallet while you go fuck yourself"-David Letterman
- bart
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4198
- Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 10:23 pm
Re: Election 2016
You don't often see a headline in the present-past perfect tense.
- Stickman
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 10402
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
- Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Re: Election 2016
"I'll hold your wallet while you go fuck yourself"-David Letterman
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46240
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 25049
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: Election 2016
For those who are lazy like me.Stickman wrote:Major companies decline to fund 2016 GOP convention
Wells Fargo, UPS, Motorola, JPMorgan Chase, Ford and Walgreens all told Bloomberg they won’t sponsor this year’s convention, despite helping to fund the last GOP summit in 2012.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21690
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Election 2016
Add Apple to the list.B wrote:For those who are lazy like me.Stickman wrote:Major companies decline to fund 2016 GOP convention
Wells Fargo, UPS, Motorola, JPMorgan Chase, Ford and Walgreens all told Bloomberg they won’t sponsor this year’s convention, despite helping to fund the last GOP summit in 2012.
McParadigm wrote:lol
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6989
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: Election 2016
The parties should be required to have the corporate sponsor logos plastered all over the arenas and anywhere you see the words "Democratic Party" or "Republican Party".
"And here is President Barack Obama to deliver the Frito Lay's keynote address. Frito Lays reminds you that it's not a party unless you have Frito Lays. The 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama!!!!!!"
"And here is President Barack Obama to deliver the Frito Lay's keynote address. Frito Lays reminds you that it's not a party unless you have Frito Lays. The 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama!!!!!!"
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- Fuck You Jobu
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
- Location: Wrigleyville
Re: Election 2016
That would be cool.4/5 wrote:The parties should be required to have the corporate sponsor logos plastered all over the arenas and anywhere you see the words "Democratic Party" or "Republican Party".
"And here is President Barack Obama to deliver the Frito Lay's keynote address. Frito Lays reminds you that it's not a party unless you have Frito Lays. The 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama!!!!!!"

This is a cool little Chrome applet that I use that helps: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/deta ... efppopfklc
And for other browsers: https://allaregreen.us/
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Election 2016
The republicans had coverage from the house switched off?
Is that being reported?
The democrats say some stuff republicans don't like and they turn the cameras off? Hello Dangerous new precident.
Is that being reported?
The democrats say some stuff republicans don't like and they turn the cameras off? Hello Dangerous new precident.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- Wendy Carlos's Twin
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2809
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am
Re: Election 2016
Considering that these are the same people who bitched and moaned bitterly for years that people were "unAmerican" for criticising GWB, and then proceeded to unleash a rash of shit on Obama for no reason at all, I don't take much stock in anything they say or do, or anyone who supports them.dimejinky99 wrote:The republicans had coverage from the house switched off?
Is that being reported?
The democrats say some stuff republicans don't like and they turn the cameras off? Hello Dangerous new precident.
- Hatfield
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 8:54 pm
Re: Election 2016
This is such big news to me and should be the headline. The NYTimes headline is: House Democrats Toss the Rule Book — but to What End?dimejinky99 wrote:The republicans had coverage from the house switched off?
Is that being reported?
The democrats say some stuff republicans don't like and they turn the cameras off? Hello Dangerous new precident.
CSPAN and major outlets resorting to a periscope feed. The media should be all over this.
- Fuck You Jobu
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
- Location: Wrigleyville
Re: Election 2016
Why?Hatfield wrote:This is such big news to me and should be the headline. The NYTimes headline is: House Democrats Toss the Rule Book — but to What End?dimejinky99 wrote:The republicans had coverage from the house switched off?
Is that being reported?
The democrats say some stuff republicans don't like and they turn the cameras off? Hello Dangerous new precident.
CSPAN and major outlets resorting to a periscope feed. The media should be all over this.
Besides they left already.
I guess Maxine Waters wasn't serious when she said she'd stay "until hell freezes over". She lasted a day....
This was just a silly election-year publicity stunt.
- Rob
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2890
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:46 am
- Location: Connecticut
Re: Election 2016
John Lewis certainly did not begin this as a publicity stunt. And I do not believe it is. That said, this is the first time during Obama's time in office that I have seen (as far as I can remember) Democrats actually fight - real protest - for something they really believe in. The bills themselves are weak and probably symbolic at best, and the degree to which they are willing to fight is obviously not known yet. A one day sit-in will perk us up for a day or two... I've not had much confidence in the Democratic party for a long time, but if they continue to protest and earn a victory here, maybe it will inspire them to stop pointing fingers and take better action.Fuck You Jobu wrote: This was just a silly election-year publicity stunt.
- Fuck You Jobu
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
- Location: Wrigleyville
Re: Election 2016
Of course it's a publicity stunt. Look no further than Waters statement - "until hell freezes over (or a day, whichever comes first)." Nothing will come out of this - your own comment on the bills reflects this. "Symbolic".Rob wrote:John Lewis certainly did not begin this as a publicity stunt. And I do not believe it is. That said, this is the first time during Obama's time in office that I have seen (as far as I can remember) Democrats actually fight - real protest - for something they really believe in. The bills themselves are weak and probably symbolic at best, and the degree to which they are willing to fight is obviously not known yet. A one day sit-in will perk us up for a day or two... I've not had much confidence in the Democratic party for a long time, but if they continue to protest and earn a victory here, maybe it will inspire them to stop pointing fingers and take better action.Fuck You Jobu wrote: This was just a silly election-year publicity stunt.
This is 1st class election-year pandering.