There was the Sandoval rumor back in spring training, and that was supposedly going to be straight up...one bad contract for anothernumbers wrote:Why would SD trade him if you were unloading a bad contract on them and not giving them a prospect of value? They aren't getting salary relief or a roster improvement.MattA75 wrote:They need at least one starter and one more bullpen arm...and honestly, they could really use two bullpen arms, because I'm not trusting Koji at all, even if we do get one more arm to replace Smith.Coach wrote:I agree with you guys. Also, Bradley is represented by Boras, as is Xander. I can't see them keeping all three and the team really needs pitching for any playoff run.
Heard this stat from Sean McAdam this AM: During the road trip, the Sox averaged 7 1/2 runs in each defeat. Ridiculous.
Never thought I'd say it, but I'd be ok with them trading for Shields at this point...as long as they can unload a bad contract and don't have to include any real prospect of value.
What about Hanley for Shields? Hanley's contract sucks but it's shorter term so San Diego saves money in the long term.
I like the idea of acquiring Shields, but given his shitty contract, I don't want to give up anything of real prospect value for him, unless San Diego is eating a good chunk of the money, and even then, why wouldn't the Red Sox just pay the contract and save the prospect(s)?
