Boston Red Sox Thread
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37455
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Yeah I'd give up one of them for Fernandez. For Gray I'd rather find a package of anything but those two guys.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I'd tell Miami to pick any 5 prospects but you can't have Moncada AND Benintendi.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
TBH, I'd let Bradley go in a Fernandez trade if it meant giving up less in the prospect dept.philpritchard wrote:Yeah, having Bogaerts, Betts and Bradley to build their offense around definitely makes trading someone like Moncada/Benintendi more palatable.numbers wrote:Especially when the Red Sox already have a very young core at the major league level.philpritchard wrote:Awesome. I was thinking that the "anything other than..." meant you wouldn't, but very, very few prospect should be off-limits in acquiring a pitcher like Fernandez.numbers wrote:I absolutely would.
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21689
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Yeah, I have a feeling he's going to even out right at .300, and while that's still great, front-line pitching is much, much more in demand.numbers wrote:TBH, I'd let Bradley go in a Fernandez trade if it meant giving up less in the prospect dept.philpritchard wrote:Yeah, having Bogaerts, Betts and Bradley to build their offense around definitely makes trading someone like Moncada/Benintendi more palatable.numbers wrote:Especially when the Red Sox already have a very young core at the major league level.philpritchard wrote:Awesome. I was thinking that the "anything other than..." meant you wouldn't, but very, very few prospect should be off-limits in acquiring a pitcher like Fernandez.numbers wrote:I absolutely would.
McParadigm wrote:lol
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I think the manager needs to go. The attitude and passion with this team and others (last year) is just so inconsistent. Time for a shake-up and a trade. Also, could it be that Price is too soft for Boston? That was my greatest fear.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I'm not really concerned about Price yet, but Farrell absolutely needs to go.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37455
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
The whole toughness is required to play in boston narrative is greatly overplayed.
- Dscans
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:57 am
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I don't see how firing Farrell is going to change anything. He's made some questionable decisions but he's not the reason they're losing. Boston still leads MLB in runs and OPS. They're a respectable 12th in fielding percentage and, believe it or not, their bullpen is ranked 10th. I don't see how a new manager is going to stop their starters from giving up four runs in the first inning of every game.
I'll be the one in the lobby in the green fuck me shirt. The green one.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37455
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Farrell is a bad manager and he doesn't deserve the job. Sure, the responsibility is on the players to perform well but I think there needs to be new organization-wide philosophy when it comes to pitching.
Fire Farrell, fire the pitching coaches, and get some new blood in the room to try a different approach.
Fire Farrell, fire the pitching coaches, and get some new blood in the room to try a different approach.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
cutuphalfdead wrote:Farrell is a bad manager and he doesn't deserve the job. Sure, the responsibility is on the players to perform well but I think there needs to be new organization-wide philosophy when it comes to pitching.
Fire Farrell, fire the pitching coaches, and get some new blood in the room to try a different approach.
Oh my god watch you guys hire leyland
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37455
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
In!@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:Farrell is a bad manager and he doesn't deserve the job. Sure, the responsibility is on the players to perform well but I think there needs to be new organization-wide philosophy when it comes to pitching.
Fire Farrell, fire the pitching coaches, and get some new blood in the room to try a different approach.
Oh my god watch you guys hire leyland
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21689
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Dittocutuphalfdead wrote:In!@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:Farrell is a bad manager and he doesn't deserve the job. Sure, the responsibility is on the players to perform well but I think there needs to be new organization-wide philosophy when it comes to pitching.
Fire Farrell, fire the pitching coaches, and get some new blood in the room to try a different approach.
Oh my god watch you guys hire leyland
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
So In.cutuphalfdead wrote:In!@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:Farrell is a bad manager and he doesn't deserve the job. Sure, the responsibility is on the players to perform well but I think there needs to be new organization-wide philosophy when it comes to pitching.
Fire Farrell, fire the pitching coaches, and get some new blood in the room to try a different approach.
Oh my god watch you guys hire leyland
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Farrell has already cost the team multiple wins with his awful in-game decision making. Firing him would absolutely make a positive difference.Dscans wrote:I don't see how firing Farrell is going to change anything. He's made some questionable decisions but he's not the reason they're losing. Boston still leads MLB in runs and OPS. They're a respectable 12th in fielding percentage and, believe it or not, their bullpen is ranked 10th. I don't see how a new manager is going to stop their starters from giving up four runs in the first inning of every game.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21689
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I don't think it's as serious as people are making it out to be.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37455
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Hey I know that guy.Simple Torture wrote:
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21689
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Gizmo?cutuphalfdead wrote:Hey I know that guy.Simple Torture wrote:
McParadigm wrote:lol
