Election 2016

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Election 2016

Post by McParadigm »

I also think that Paul Ryan could have traded a moment of minor political upheaval for a lifetime of reputation as The Man Who Stood Up for Conservatism, and gained inmeasurably by it, and instead he shrugged and gave his endorsement like a good sheep.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51692
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 5:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Election 2016

Post by McParadigm »

Honestly though, I'm counting on total societal collapse related to global warming, mass social unrest, and nuclear conflicts over dwindling resources to ensure that my rotting corpse is left abandoned to be torn apart by wild, radiation-swollen animal-monsters.

So things are going well for me this election cycle.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46240
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Election 2016

Post by BurtReynolds »

I only wish you guys would survive long enough to realize the preppers were right.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51692
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 5:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29891
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Election 2016

Post by 96583UP »

tragabigzanda wrote:
McParadigm wrote:I also think that Paul Ryan could have traded a moment of minor political upheaval for a lifetime of reputation as The Man Who Stood Up for Conservatism, and gained inmeasurably by it, and instead he shrugged and gave his endorsement like a good sheep.
Yea, I think he really shot himself in the foot here. There's still time for him to backpedal, but not for much longer.
i don't think he'll backpedal

although Ryan likely despises Trump he will need to appeal to Trump's supporters for his own forthcoming failed presidential nomination

i hope that a few years from now we just look back at this for what it is - Trump's nomination is burst of maggots exploding from a dead animal's carcass and the marker post that a once live and functioning creature has disintegrated

years of hubris, manipulation, and lack of decency has left the republican party with a horde of incoherent feral animals to call their voter base

and it will lead to no organized political gains

but probably some stabbings or shootings
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
Stickman
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10402
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada

Re: Election 2016

Post by Stickman »

"I'll hold your wallet while you go fuck yourself"-David Letterman
User avatar
bart
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4198
Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 10:23 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by bart »

You don't often see a headline in the present-past perfect tense.
User avatar
Stickman
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10402
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada

Re: Election 2016

Post by Stickman »

"I'll hold your wallet while you go fuck yourself"-David Letterman
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46240
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Election 2016

Post by BurtReynolds »

vote secured

RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25049
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: Election 2016

Post by B »

For those who are lazy like me.
Wells Fargo, UPS, Motorola, JPMorgan Chase, Ford and Walgreens all told Bloomberg they won’t sponsor this year’s convention, despite helping to fund the last GOP summit in 2012.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21690
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Election 2016

Post by Simple Torture »

B wrote:
For those who are lazy like me.
Wells Fargo, UPS, Motorola, JPMorgan Chase, Ford and Walgreens all told Bloomberg they won’t sponsor this year’s convention, despite helping to fund the last GOP summit in 2012.
Add Apple to the list.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6989
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by 4/5 »

The parties should be required to have the corporate sponsor logos plastered all over the arenas and anywhere you see the words "Democratic Party" or "Republican Party".

"And here is President Barack Obama to deliver the Frito Lay's keynote address. Frito Lays reminds you that it's not a party unless you have Frito Lays. The 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama!!!!!!"
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

User avatar
Fuck You Jobu
AnalLog
Posts: 1531
Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
Location: Wrigleyville

Re: Election 2016

Post by Fuck You Jobu »

4/5 wrote:The parties should be required to have the corporate sponsor logos plastered all over the arenas and anywhere you see the words "Democratic Party" or "Republican Party".

"And here is President Barack Obama to deliver the Frito Lay's keynote address. Frito Lays reminds you that it's not a party unless you have Frito Lays. The 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama!!!!!!"
That would be cool.

Image

This is a cool little Chrome applet that I use that helps: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/deta ... efppopfklc

And for other browsers: https://allaregreen.us/

Image
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Election 2016

Post by dimejinky99 »

The republicans had coverage from the house switched off?
Is that being reported?

The democrats say some stuff republicans don't like and they turn the cameras off? Hello Dangerous new precident.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
Wendy Carlos's Twin
Future Drummer
Posts: 2809
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am

Re: Election 2016

Post by Wendy Carlos's Twin »

dimejinky99 wrote:The republicans had coverage from the house switched off?
Is that being reported?

The democrats say some stuff republicans don't like and they turn the cameras off? Hello Dangerous new precident.
Considering that these are the same people who bitched and moaned bitterly for years that people were "unAmerican" for criticising GWB, and then proceeded to unleash a rash of shit on Obama for no reason at all, I don't take much stock in anything they say or do, or anyone who supports them.
User avatar
Hatfield
AnalLog
Posts: 1517
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 8:54 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by Hatfield »

dimejinky99 wrote:The republicans had coverage from the house switched off?
Is that being reported?

The democrats say some stuff republicans don't like and they turn the cameras off? Hello Dangerous new precident.
This is such big news to me and should be the headline. The NYTimes headline is: House Democrats Toss the Rule Book — but to What End?

CSPAN and major outlets resorting to a periscope feed. The media should be all over this.
User avatar
Fuck You Jobu
AnalLog
Posts: 1531
Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
Location: Wrigleyville

Re: Election 2016

Post by Fuck You Jobu »

Hatfield wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:The republicans had coverage from the house switched off?
Is that being reported?

The democrats say some stuff republicans don't like and they turn the cameras off? Hello Dangerous new precident.
This is such big news to me and should be the headline. The NYTimes headline is: House Democrats Toss the Rule Book — but to What End?

CSPAN and major outlets resorting to a periscope feed. The media should be all over this.
Why?

Besides they left already.

I guess Maxine Waters wasn't serious when she said she'd stay "until hell freezes over". She lasted a day....

This was just a silly election-year publicity stunt.
User avatar
Rob
Future Drummer
Posts: 2890
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:46 am
Location: Connecticut

Re: Election 2016

Post by Rob »

Fuck You Jobu wrote: This was just a silly election-year publicity stunt.
John Lewis certainly did not begin this as a publicity stunt. And I do not believe it is. That said, this is the first time during Obama's time in office that I have seen (as far as I can remember) Democrats actually fight - real protest - for something they really believe in. The bills themselves are weak and probably symbolic at best, and the degree to which they are willing to fight is obviously not known yet. A one day sit-in will perk us up for a day or two... I've not had much confidence in the Democratic party for a long time, but if they continue to protest and earn a victory here, maybe it will inspire them to stop pointing fingers and take better action.
User avatar
Fuck You Jobu
AnalLog
Posts: 1531
Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
Location: Wrigleyville

Re: Election 2016

Post by Fuck You Jobu »

Rob wrote:
Fuck You Jobu wrote: This was just a silly election-year publicity stunt.
John Lewis certainly did not begin this as a publicity stunt. And I do not believe it is. That said, this is the first time during Obama's time in office that I have seen (as far as I can remember) Democrats actually fight - real protest - for something they really believe in. The bills themselves are weak and probably symbolic at best, and the degree to which they are willing to fight is obviously not known yet. A one day sit-in will perk us up for a day or two... I've not had much confidence in the Democratic party for a long time, but if they continue to protest and earn a victory here, maybe it will inspire them to stop pointing fingers and take better action.
Of course it's a publicity stunt. Look no further than Waters statement - "until hell freezes over (or a day, whichever comes first)." Nothing will come out of this - your own comment on the bills reflects this. "Symbolic".

This is 1st class election-year pandering.
Post Reply