digster wrote:This isn't meant to be a dick-ish sounding post, more just curious; why would something like "I'm Open" or even Mankind counts as a song and the stuff like Aye Davantina and Stupid Mop on Vitalogy doesn't. I get arguing that the album may contain your favorite songs, but it seems like for better or for worse those tracks are on there. Maybe it's their best album in spite of those tracks. I realize this risks redoing that whole Vitalogy guided tour thing again.
I thought i explained this in the first post but I can try and do a better job.
1. I think the 'filler' songs make sense on the album thematically (for the most part) and so when I think about the album as a whole they make sense for me there. The record may even be better for their inclusion. On the other hand, I don't know that I'd say mankind enhances No Code (or I'm open or some of the weaker no code tracks). Comparing Bugs and I'm Open, for instance--I think Bugs is a pretty savage and very clever spoken word piece that reinforces many of the important ideas and themes on vitalogy in a bitterly fun way. I'm Open is sort of endearing and embarassing at the same time in the same way that looking back at your high school yearbook photo might be, but it's not something you'd revisit for any reason other than the fact that you haven't done it for a while.
2. I think this analogy makes sense. The 'experimental' tracks on vitalogy enhance the album but I don't think of them as songs in the normal sense so it is easy to detatch them from my normal listening. They are like deleted scenes in a movie that add useful context and enhance your appreciation of the film, but they aren't things you need to watch it. Whereas the No Code songs, because they seem more like normal songs to me, are harder for me to overlook. They're more like a bad scene in the movie proper, and so harder to overlook.