Ghostbusters (2016)

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51788
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Oh boy
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by @SkitchP »

Strat wrote: So, it seems like this was more of a slapstick comedy update of the movie. I love the original ghostbusters because of the dry sense of humor. The humor feels inherent rather than forced. Am i wrong?

this has been exactly my point concerning this movie.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36494
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Jorge »

Yeah it's a completely different brand of humor. I don't have a huge attachment to the original but I can definitely say it's funnier than this one.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35453
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by spike »

"fine" has been my prediction all long
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45834
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by BurtReynolds »

Image
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

BurtReynolds wrote:Image
I love this so much
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by VinylGuy »

Wow, she is dying right there.

Fuckin Hollywood.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8516
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Mecca »

theplatypus wrote:This was... fine! It was fine. 6.5/10. Some very funny moments, but also some insufferably Bridesmaids-y jokes. McKinnon and Hemsworth ran away with the whole thing, especially McKinnon. And I can't put into words exactly why I loved her and her character so much. Most surprisingly for me, Leslie Jones wasn't nearly as annoying as the trailers made her out to be. A lot fewer "AW HELL NO" moments than I thought we'd be getting from her. It was cool how they played with the aspect ratio and the 3D.

There was a stretch towards the beginning where I was really hating this thing. Some really Paul Feig-y "bits" that went on for eye-rollingly long. Some really terrible jokes. The constant callbacks to and cameos from the old Ghostbusters movies were bad and unnecessary, except for the one during the credits. The fight during the rock concert reminded me of Vanilla Ice in the second Ninja Turtles movie. The big climactic battle at the end is a big nothing, save for one big moment with McKinnon. The characterization seemed all over the place for all the main characters except the most overtly cartoonish ones (again, Hemsworth and McKinnon). And this has got to be my least-favorite cinematic depiction of New York City. It didn't even look like New York.

Overall, it was fine. I laughed and I groaned. My girlfriend loved it. The crowd was way into it. It's a kid-friendly movie. It was fine. It was FINE.
WHO PAID YOU?!
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36494
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Jorge »

I'd like to lower my score to 6/10 because I just remembered the truly horrible bit about cats and bags.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45834
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by BurtReynolds »

I heard there was a pretty good queef joke.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36494
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Jorge »

5.5
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51788
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Lol
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8516
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Mecca »

User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8516
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Mecca »

i feel like she's agreeing with me about the quality of this movie i had gathered from the trailers
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35453
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by spike »

Mecca wrote:
strongest evidence to date that durdencommatyler is actually annie clark
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8516
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Mecca »

spike wrote:
Mecca wrote:
strongest evidence to date that durdencommatyler is actually annie clark
exactly! no wonder chud loves him.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by @SkitchP »

Mecca wrote:

God I hate this.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21560
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Simple Torture »

I would watch Citizen Kane with a gerbil cast.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45834
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by BurtReynolds »

Simple Torture wrote:I would watch Citizen Kane with a gerbil cast.
on it.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by @SkitchP »

BurtReynolds wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:I would watch Citizen Kane with a gerbil cast.
on it.

Oh man, Scurry just took a bizarre turn.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
Post Reply