Ghostbusters (2016)

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45833
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by BurtReynolds »

nm
Last edited by BurtReynolds on Mon August 15, 2022 10:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Kaius »

Kate McKinnon is the greatest actress in the universe.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Kaius »

This movie was fun. I think I liked it more than Jorge. 8/10. Good visuals and sound. Good use of the 3D. Some clunky writing to be found throughout, especially in the opening act, and a few flat jokes ("...and sometimes you just need the Swiss army..."), but the characters were great top to bottom (MCKINNON! OMAR! TYWIN! LESLIE! MCKINNON!), the action was good to serviceable, and I laughed a lot. It got cheesy but it was good cheese. The cat out of the bag bit was funny.

7.5/10
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Kaius »

KATE MCKINNON
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36494
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Jorge »

Oh I hated that cat out of the bag bit so much. It's the Paul Feigiest joke in the movie.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21560
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Simple Torture »

theplatypus wrote:Feigiest
How would you pronounce this word?
McParadigm wrote:lol
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Kaius »

I don't really know who Paul Feig is so
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36494
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Jorge »

Simple Torture wrote:
theplatypus wrote:Feigiest
How would you pronounce this word?
Just add "-iest" to "Feig".
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36494
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Jorge »

Kaius wrote:I don't really know who Paul Feig is so
The director of this movie who also made the witless comedic sinkhole that is Bridesmaids
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Kaius »

theplatypus wrote:
Kaius wrote:I don't really know who Paul Feig is so
The director of this movie who also made the witless comedic sinkhole that is Bridesmaids
Ah. Yeah. I didn't like that movie. It wasn't very good. Not like this year's masterpiece, "Ghostbusters".

KATE MCKINNON
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8516
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Mecca »

@SkitchP wrote:
Mecca wrote:

God I hate this.
what? just accept that this movie is the crux of gender equality
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21560
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Simple Torture »

Mecca wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Mecca wrote:

God I hate this.
what? just accept that this movie is the crux of gender equality
That's the feigiest thing I've ever heard.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8516
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Mecca »

Simple Torture wrote:
Mecca wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Mecca wrote:

God I hate this.
what? just accept that this movie is the crux of gender equality
That's the feigiest thing I've ever heard.
jorgiest post ever
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

Because I know you're all just dying to know (hahahahaha)....

I really enjoyed the movie. Not only is it actually a good movie -- yes, there is some cheese and cringy moments; it's not flawless by any means -- but it's also an important movie. I've never seen a major Hollywood film that portrayed women and their relationships this way. They aren't sexualized but they kick all kinds of ass. They don't cry while eating ice cream and dream about boys. They are smart, action hero, women who drive the plot and save the world.

It's absolutely better than Ghostbuseters 2. I don't like it as much as the original, but a lot of that has to do with the fact that it's a recycled idea. But the cast is great. KM, especially. The soundtrack is fun. The visuals are great. It's a unique tone and vibe and style of humor so it manages to seperate itself from while celebrating the original.

If you care at all about how women are depicted on screen in major Hollywood Blockbuster cinema, I'd strongly suggest you go see the movie. Like it, love it, hate it. It's important that you go and see it. This movie could be a big turning point.

Here's a post I shared on Facebook from a women (Erynn Brook) whom I don't know but says it better than I just did (and I borrowed a bit from her).
Spoiler: show
On Ghostbusters:

I have to say something, I have to, because for the first time in my life I felt something that I had never felt before. I sat in that theatre and though I've been watching movies my entire life I saw and felt something completely new.

It started about an hour in when it really began to sink in that I was watching women being funny, quirky, hysterical even, but not cute. Just hilarious.

Then I noticed that they weren't talking about guys. Not much, a bit here and there, a little joke about Chris Hemsworth peppered in like seasoning, but it wasn't hours of 4 women fighting over him or trying to figure out why they weren't married yet.

And then, the fight sequence at the end. Kate McKinnon just... I sat there gaping. She was badass, WITHOUT BEING SEXUALIZED. She was a woman in coveralls and combat boots with no cleavage or hourglass figure in sight fucking kicking ass and it was so awesome and amazing and for the first time in almost 30 years I saw a woman doing something badass without also being sexy at the same time.

When action sequences always sexualize women, women grow up learning that the things they do are only important if they look good doing them.

I'm almost 30 and last night was the first time I saw a movie where a woman fucking did a thing and was funny without crying into a pint of ice cream and was badass without being a pinup and all I could think was... I really didn't know that was an option. I really didn't know you could save the world without looking like you're trying to pose for Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition at the same time. I have never, in 30 years, seen a major movie that didn't reinforce the message that how I look is more important than what I do.

30 years is way too long.

And that's why it matters.

Go see Ghostbusters. Love it, hate it, I don't care. Go see Ghostbusters. It matters.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

Who gives a shit? Why can't we just focus on what matters???
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:Who gives a shit? Why can't we just focus on what matters???
This does matter, friend-o. I know Kanye wasn't invovled but don't let that deminish it's impact for you.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Strat »

I want to see this.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

where is ghostbusters comment on blm
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

Strat wrote:I want to see this.
I don't believe you.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Strat »

durdencommatyler wrote:
Strat wrote:I want to see this.
I don't believe you.
i actually do! My interest was piqued with all the great reviews.
Post Reply