Ghostbusters (2016)

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36494
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Jorge »

To me the problem with framing this as some sort of turning point is that Hollywood tends to learn the worst possible lessons from its successes. So instead of "oh cool, this movie turned out a nice profit, let's give more women fleshed-out central roles for big-budget tentpoles", it might be "awesome! Let's make an all-lady Blues Brothers next!"
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28035
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Monkey_Driven »

theplatypus wrote:To me the problem with framing this as some sort of turning point is that Hollywood tends to learn the worst possible lessons from its successes. So instead of "oh cool, this movie turned out a nice profit, let's give more women fleshed-out central roles for big-budget tentpoles", it might be "awesome! Let's make an all-lady Blues Brothers next!"
Yup.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

theplatypus wrote:To me the problem with framing this as some sort of turning point is that Hollywood tends to learn the worst possible lessons from its successes. So instead of "oh cool, this movie turned out a nice profit, let's give more women fleshed-out central roles for big-budget tentpoles", it might be "awesome! Let's make an all-lady Blues Brothers next!"
Sure. But I don't have a problem with that. I really don't. It has to start somewhere. And if an all female Blues Brothers is as good as this, so be it. I'd prefer an original idea but it's not gonna happen over night. Whatever steps need to happen.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Kaius »

The lesson to be learned here is hire Kate McKinnon for everything from here on out.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

Kaius wrote:The lesson to be learned here is hire Kate McKinnon for everything from here on out.
:hooray:
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

Melissa McCarthy isn't going to get credit for her work in this because she's not as funny or over the top as others. But her acting work, her actual beat work is on point. She really brings it.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Kaius »

The only character I wasn't crazy about was the villian. He was a little bland, but maybe that was how he was written--to be forgettable and a "nobody"? Everyone else put in good work. I couldn't get enough of KM, though. Her skills are off the chain.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Strat »

Would you say this movie is more or less culturally important as Batman vs superman vs everything else
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Kaius »

If they remade Batman vs Superman and recast all major characters as Kate McKinnon there would be no reason to ever make another film.
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by B »

Kaius wrote:If they remade Batman vs Superman and recast all major characters as Kate McKinnon there would be no reason to ever make another film.
Obviously. :roll:
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by VinylGuy »

I havent seen the movie yet, but all those comments on this movie being something ¨important¨ are hilarious.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Kaius »

B wrote:
Kaius wrote:If they remade Batman vs Superman and recast all major characters as Kate McKinnon there would be no reason to ever make another film.
Obviously. :roll:
Thank you for your support. What else do you think about Ghostbusters, Kate McKinnon, and stuff like that?
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Kaius »

VinylGuy wrote:I havent seen the movie yet, but all those comments on this movie being something ¨important¨ are hilarious.
It's important to that 30 year old woman that posted about it on Facebook. Didn't you read that?
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

VinylGuy wrote:I havent seen the movie yet, but all those comments on this movie being something ¨important¨ are hilarious.
It's not, though. It really matters to people, VG. Maybe not to you. But this has had a signficant impact on women and I think that's awesome. To downplay that negligent and narrow minded.
User avatar
Rangi Guy
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9430
Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Rangi Guy »

So is this worth downloading?
"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
User avatar
MissYouAllDay
A Return To Form
Posts: 174
Joined: Sat July 16, 2016 2:04 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by MissYouAllDay »

This could be Women's Rosa Parks moment.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Strat »

I was serious about my question though. Mostly, i was just serious at poking fun of our resident millennial hot head
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by B »

Kaius wrote:
B wrote:
Kaius wrote:If they remade Batman vs Superman and recast all major characters as Kate McKinnon there would be no reason to ever make another film.
Obviously. :roll:
Thank you for your support. What else do you think about Ghostbusters, Kate McKinnon, and stuff like that?
I don't know. Same stuff as you, probably.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by VinylGuy »

durdencommatyler wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:I havent seen the movie yet, but all those comments on this movie being something ¨important¨ are hilarious.
It's not, though. It really matters to people, VG. Maybe not to you. But this has had a signficant impact on women and I think that's awesome. To downplay that negligent and narrow minded.
My feeling is that all this gender drama was pretty much overblown in the media...Im still havent seen the movie, and i will so i can have a better view on it, but im asking to you...is this movie different from any other with woman as leads? Why is this one ¨the important¨ one?
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

VinylGuy wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:I havent seen the movie yet, but all those comments on this movie being something ¨important¨ are hilarious.
It's not, though. It really matters to people, VG. Maybe not to you. But this has had a signficant impact on women and I think that's awesome. To downplay that negligent and narrow minded.
My feeling is that all this gender drama was pretty much overblown in the media...Im still havent seen the movie, and i will so i can have a better view on it, but im asking to you...is this movie different from any other with woman as leads? Why is this one ¨the important¨ one?
Yes it is different. Once again I'll post this to show why it's important:
On Ghostbusters:

I have to say something, I have to, because for the first time in my life I felt something that I had never felt before. I sat in that theatre and though I've been watching movies my entire life I saw and felt something completely new.

It started about an hour in when it really began to sink in that I was watching women being funny, quirky, hysterical even, but not cute. Just hilarious.

Then I noticed that they weren't talking about guys. Not much, a bit here and there, a little joke about Chris Hemsworth peppered in like seasoning, but it wasn't hours of 4 women fighting over him or trying to figure out why they weren't married yet.

And then, the fight sequence at the end. Kate McKinnon just... I sat there gaping. She was badass, WITHOUT BEING SEXUALIZED. She was a woman in coveralls and combat boots with no cleavage or hourglass figure in sight fucking kicking ass and it was so awesome and amazing and for the first time in almost 30 years I saw a woman doing something badass without also being sexy at the same time.

When action sequences always sexualize women, women grow up learning that the things they do are only important if they look good doing them.

I'm almost 30 and last night was the first time I saw a movie where a woman fucking did a thing and was funny without crying into a pint of ice cream and was badass without being a pinup and all I could think was... I really didn't know that was an option. I really didn't know you could save the world without looking like you're trying to pose for Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition at the same time. I have never, in 30 years, seen a major movie that didn't reinforce the message that how I look is more important than what I do.

30 years is way too long.

And that's why it matters.

Go see Ghostbusters. Love it, hate it, I don't care. Go see Ghostbusters. It matters.
Post Reply