Ghostbusters (2016)

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

She's right. In my 36 years I have never seen a major Hollywood tentpole film like this that features an all female ensemble cast that is composed of real women who are not overtly sexualized, obsessed with men, crying over men, reliant on relationships with men, who are funny and powerful and affect the plot in positive ways. These are four friends who don't fall into any of the common traps/tropes of the hollywood female lead. It is important. And this movie deserves to be seen and make money.

But even if it wasn't imporant on all those points, which it clearly is, it's also just a good movie. It's fun and funny and a blast to watch, even in spite of it's flaws. It's not a perfect movie but it is funny and charming and there are some great visuals that surprised me, even as someone who expected to enjoy the movie.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by VinylGuy »

Yeah, i read that. Like i said i havent seen the movie yet but...still..action movies tend to sexualize both men and women.
So..im still not sure about why this is so different...there is a lot of movies with women leads that arent sexualized..why is this different? Because she tell so?
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

VinylGuy wrote:Yeah, i read that. Like i said i havent seen the movie yet but...still..action movies tend to sexualize both men and women.
So..im still not sure about why this is so different...there is a lot of movies with women leads that arent sexualized..why is this different? Because she tell so?
I obviously can't explain this to you.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by VinylGuy »

durdencommatyler wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:Yeah, i read that. Like i said i havent seen the movie yet but...still..action movies tend to sexualize both men and women.
So..im still not sure about why this is so different...there is a lot of movies with women leads that arent sexualized..why is this different? Because she tell so?
I obviously can't explain this to you.
I really would like an explanation. Still, maybe i just need to see the movie though.
I feel the movie gained a lot from the stupid backlash of ¨ i hate it because they are women¨ and now its being introduced as a ¨important gender moment¨ were it might not be that at all.

Like i said, i might have a better response when i see this.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

From your responses here, I'm guessing you won't.

But you should still see the movie.
User avatar
MissYouAllDay
A Return To Form
Posts: 174
Joined: Sat July 16, 2016 2:04 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by MissYouAllDay »

Ouch
User avatar
Rangi Guy
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9429
Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Rangi Guy »

Are these women more kick-ass then say Ripley?
Image
"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

Ripley is such a great character. :bammer:
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by VinylGuy »

Thats a really good example of what i was saying.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

But it's not a really good example of what I was saying.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by VinylGuy »

why not?
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

In simplist terms, because although she is a great character, strong and everthing else, the film she's in does unnecessarily sexualize her as well as project themes of male dominance on her. That isn't a part of Ghostbusters at all. In addition, Ripley is on her own whereas we're seeing a team of women in Ghostbusters who don't fall victim to the typical tropes/traps that men usually put women in on film.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Kaius »

Let's talk about the visuals.

2016 Slimer carjacking.

Ghostvomit everywhere.

A slew of ghostbusting weapons that will make a lot of kids' xmas and birthday gift lists.

Kate McKinnon
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45833
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by BurtReynolds »

Go see Ghostbusters. Love it, hate it, I don't care. Go see Ghostbusters. It matters
Drinking that marketing koolaid.

Women can star in regurgitated, soulless, cash grab shit, too! Yay. Let's not plant the gender equality flag here, fellas. This movie is made to fill Sony executive's wallets, nothing more.

No, it doesn't matter.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

Dismissal of women and their worth is nothing new. Maybe someday.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45833
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by BurtReynolds »

We can do better.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Kaius »

Burt you gotta see the death metal concert ghost battle.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Kaius »

It's a must see.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36494
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Jorge »

The worst part of this movie was definitely Bill Murray's weird, unnecessary role.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

BurtReynolds wrote:We can do better.
And we must. And I believe we will. But everyone around here thinks I'm a manic cynic. So, take that with a grain of salt.
Post Reply