Ghostbusters (2016)

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Kaius »

theplatypus wrote:The worst part of this movie was definitely Bill Murray's weird, unnecessary role.
It was weird. But he is weird. I can see that being all his idea and they didn't have the heart to say no. Akroyd's cameo was a good one.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Kaius »

durdencommatyler wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:We can do better.
And we must. And I believe we will. But everyone around here thinks I'm a manic cynic. So, take that with a grain of salt.
Whoa whoa whoa. Not everyone.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45833
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by BurtReynolds »

Kaius wrote:Burt you gotta see the death metal concert ghost battle.
It looked like a barrel of laughs in the trailer.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45833
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by BurtReynolds »

Kaius wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:We can do better.
And we must. And I believe we will. But everyone around here thinks I'm a manic cynic. So, take that with a grain of salt.
Whoa whoa whoa. Not everyone.
But definitely someone.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

BurtReynolds wrote:
Kaius wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:We can do better.
And we must. And I believe we will. But everyone around here thinks I'm a manic cynic. So, take that with a grain of salt.
Whoa whoa whoa. Not everyone.
But definitely someone.
Definitely most. Or at least definitely 4. That's most of RM anymore right?
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Kaius »

BurtReynolds wrote:
Kaius wrote:Burt you gotta see the death metal concert ghost battle.
It looked like a barrel of laughs in the trailer.
Does everything have to be funny to you?
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36494
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Jorge »

Kaius wrote:
theplatypus wrote:The worst part of this movie was definitely Bill Murray's weird, unnecessary role.
It was weird. But he is weird. I can see that being all his idea and they didn't have the heart to say no. Akroyd's cameo was a good one.
I don't know. The Sony e-mail leaks suggest they had to pretty much force him to do it.

I thought all the cameos were bad except for Sigourney Weaver's.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

Kaius wrote:
theplatypus wrote:The worst part of this movie was definitely Bill Murray's weird, unnecessary role.
It was weird. But he is weird. I can see that being all his idea and they didn't have the heart to say no. Akroyd's cameo was a good one.
But I liked that
Spoiler: show
Bill always said he'd do another Ghostbusters if they agreed to kill him and they went ahead and killed him. That was kind of awesome. I have no issue with Murray's cameo.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

The internet is really making me hate identity politics
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45833
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by BurtReynolds »

Kaius wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
Kaius wrote:Burt you gotta see the death metal concert ghost battle.
It looked like a barrel of laughs in the trailer.
Does everything have to be funny to you?
everything is funny to me.

Image
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Strat »

I want to go see this tonight actually. Hmm
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:The internet is really making me hate identity politics
Stop being dumb and biased.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Kaius »

theplatypus wrote:
Kaius wrote:
theplatypus wrote:The worst part of this movie was definitely Bill Murray's weird, unnecessary role.
It was weird. But he is weird. I can see that being all his idea and they didn't have the heart to say no. Akroyd's cameo was a good one.
I don't know. The Sony e-mail leaks suggest they had to pretty much force him to do it.

I thought all the cameos were bad except for Sigourney Weaver's.
Hers was the best. Yeah.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

Strat wrote:I want to go see this tonight actually. Hmm
I hope you enjoy it. It's far, far, far from perfect. But there's so much to like about it even when you remove yourself from the larger debate/implications. It's a fun movie.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Kaius »

BurtReynolds wrote:
Kaius wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
Kaius wrote:Burt you gotta see the death metal concert ghost battle.
It looked like a barrel of laughs in the trailer.
Does everything have to be funny to you?
everything is funny to me.

Image
Kate McKinnon would make a great Joker.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

Kaius wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
Kaius wrote:
theplatypus wrote:The worst part of this movie was definitely Bill Murray's weird, unnecessary role.
It was weird. But he is weird. I can see that being all his idea and they didn't have the heart to say no. Akroyd's cameo was a good one.
I don't know. The Sony e-mail leaks suggest they had to pretty much force him to do it.

I thought all the cameos were bad except for Sigourney Weaver's.
Hers was the best. Yeah.
RANK THE CAMEOS!
Spoiler: show
1. Weaver
2. Raimis
3. Hudson
4. Murray
5. Potts
6. Aykroyd
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Strat »

durdencommatyler wrote:
Strat wrote:I want to go see this tonight actually. Hmm
I hope you enjoy it. It's far, far, far from perfect. But there's so much to like about it even when you remove yourself from the larger debate/implications. It's a fun movie.
I have absolutely no problem with the casting, or the bigger social implications this movie may or may not have on its shoulders.

The only thing i've ever been concerned with was:
1. The fact it was remade to begin with and
2. The type of humor in comparison to the original.

Only problem is - Me and the lady spend our free time watching LOST :)
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

Also, is Kate McKinnon's hairstyle in the movie a reference to Egon in the old The Real Ghostbusters cartoon?
Spoiler: show
Image
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36494
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by Jorge »

That's what I thought, yeah
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

Strat wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Strat wrote:I want to go see this tonight actually. Hmm
I hope you enjoy it. It's far, far, far from perfect. But there's so much to like about it even when you remove yourself from the larger debate/implications. It's a fun movie.
I have absolutely no problem with the casting, or the bigger social implications this movie may or may not have on its shoulders.

The only thing i've ever been concerned with was:
1. The fact it was remade to begin with and
2. The type of humor in comparison to the original.

Only problem is - Me and the lady spend our free time watching LOST :)
There was no reason to remake Ghostbusters, for sure. But I'll side with LV on this and say, if it's a good movie, who really cares? If it's good, it's good and the mere fact of it being a reboot is silly and unimportant.

And I think it's good.

As far as #2 goes... don't go in expecting the same style of humor. It's different. It's less dry and grounded throughout. This is it's own thing and product of its time just as the original is a product of its time.
Post Reply