This is more relevant than unemployment numbers when describing the problems Western middle class faces.Bi_3 wrote:McParadigm wrote:The U6 trends nearly identical to U3. The numbers are just bigger because it is creating a more holistic view. So the massive downtrend in unemployment starting in 2010 is as clear using that marker as on the U3.Bi_3 wrote:jwfocker wrote:Bi_3 wrote:For the 10's of millions of Americans whose jobs were destroyed by globalization or immigration, shit's not exactly coming up roses. If the Dems would stop calling all these people racists for 5 minutes and listen to their issues, we could probably get rid of Floppsie and his clown brigade.Biff Pocoroba wrote:I had watched most of the convention until last night, when I only caught most of Trump. Aren't those speeches supposed to be upbeat & optimistic instead of dark & gloomy? It was like he was running for mayor of Gotham City instead of President.
Unemployment is at 4.9% which is the lowest its been in a decade.
Quoting the U3 as an argument showes you have no idea what you are talking about nor what I was talking about.
Sure. But that was about beginning understanding the meaning of the statistic vs. typing "us unemployment rate" into google. The next step is to pull that number apart and begin to understand changes in those trend lines for Trump's supporters demographics.

And don't get me started on wage stagnation.

