MLB

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35997
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: MLB

Post by spike »

Cubs close to picking up Aroldis Chapman. :shock:
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: MLB

Post by verb_to_trust »

Who are they giving up?
Dick/Balls
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35997
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: MLB

Post by spike »

Some SS prospect who's blocked by Russell/Baez.
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: MLB

Post by verb_to_trust »

I'm kind of torn. Should they give up their best prospect for a one year rental at a position they aren't even really that weak at? You could argue moving Rondon to setup would strengthen the bullpen significantly but how many times do closers adjust well to change? They are all mentally ill.
Dick/Balls
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

Plus he beats his wife.
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: MLB

Post by verb_to_trust »

His quotes about resigning with New York even if he gets traded were weird. He's really good and professional (on the field at least) but I can't shake the image of him longing for Brian Cashman's loving touch when he should be worried about closing a game 7.
Dick/Balls
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35997
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: MLB

Post by spike »

sounds good.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

verb_to_trust wrote:I'm kind of torn. Should they give up their best prospect for a one year rental at a position they aren't even really that weak at? You could argue moving Rondon to setup would strengthen the bullpen significantly but how many times do closers adjust well to change? They are all mentally ill.
I think when your starting SS is 22, your backup is 23, and your starting 2B is under contract for three more years, you can afford to give up someone like that more than a lot of other teams.
User avatar
Teeeeeekay
AnalLog
Posts: 1089
Joined: Mon October 26, 2015 9:30 pm

Re: MLB

Post by Teeeeeekay »

I like the fact dea of them getting Chapman, especially if that means he stays off of Washingtons roster.
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: MLB

Post by Electromatic »

Chris Sale finds interesting crosses to bear... Adam Laroche's kid at practice and tight throwback Jerseys.

He must be a riot to sit next to in the clubhouse.
Last edited by Electromatic on Mon July 25, 2016 8:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: MLB

Post by verb_to_trust »

philpritchard wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:I'm kind of torn. Should they give up their best prospect for a one year rental at a position they aren't even really that weak at? You could argue moving Rondon to setup would strengthen the bullpen significantly but how many times do closers adjust well to change? They are all mentally ill.
I think when your starting SS is 22, your backup is 23, and your starting 2B is under contract for three more years, you can afford to give up someone like that more than a lot of other teams.
Yeah. And I guess they have another middle infield prospect in the minors that is pretty decent. Warren was a total bust and the other minor league bat had a hairline fracture in his leg last year that is apparently still bothering him.
Dick/Balls
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: MLB

Post by Electromatic »

http://www.ajc.com/news/sports/baseball ... job/nr5qs/

Hey, cool, a guy who gave away "another" 400 million dollars to a professional franchise got roundly voted out. Good start.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: MLB

Post by @SkitchP »

Teeeeeekay wrote:I like the fact dea of them getting Chapman, especially if that means he stays off of Washingtons roster.

This is an interesting point. This year, the trade market is incredibly thin in terms of impact players that are likely to be "sold." So I guess with every overpay to obtain one, you are achieving two things- obtaining the player you want, and making the market even thinner for the other contenders to improve themselves.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52042
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: MLB

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

2,998 hits!
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

@SkitchP wrote:
Teeeeeekay wrote:I like the fact dea of them getting Chapman, especially if that means he stays off of Washingtons roster.

This is an interesting point. This year, the trade market is incredibly thin in terms of impact players that are likely to be "sold." So I guess with every overpay to obtain one, you are achieving two things- obtaining the player you want, and making the market even thinner for the other contenders to improve themselves.
Not really an impact player, but I like that the Jays picked up Upton to give themselves outfield depth when the Orioles were trying to get him to fill a huge hole in the outfield.
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: MLB

Post by Electromatic »

philpritchard wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Teeeeeekay wrote:I like the fact dea of them getting Chapman, especially if that means he stays off of Washingtons roster.

This is an interesting point. This year, the trade market is incredibly thin in terms of impact players that are likely to be "sold." So I guess with every overpay to obtain one, you are achieving two things- obtaining the player you want, and making the market even thinner for the other contenders to improve themselves.
Not really an impact player, but I like that the Jays picked up Upton to give themselves outfield depth when the Orioles were trying to get him to fill a huge hole in the outfield.
He should be fine as a 4th outfielder.

75 million dollars doesn't go too far these days.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: MLB

Post by @SkitchP »

philpritchard wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Teeeeeekay wrote:I like the fact dea of them getting Chapman, especially if that means he stays off of Washingtons roster.

This is an interesting point. This year, the trade market is incredibly thin in terms of impact players that are likely to be "sold." So I guess with every overpay to obtain one, you are achieving two things- obtaining the player you want, and making the market even thinner for the other contenders to improve themselves.
Not really an impact player, but I like that the Jays picked up Upton to give themselves outfield depth when the Orioles were trying to get him to fill a huge hole in the outfield.

Yeah, thats a really good example actually. Upgrading your team while denying your rivals as many options to do the same.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

Electromatic wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Teeeeeekay wrote:I like the fact dea of them getting Chapman, especially if that means he stays off of Washingtons roster.

This is an interesting point. This year, the trade market is incredibly thin in terms of impact players that are likely to be "sold." So I guess with every overpay to obtain one, you are achieving two things- obtaining the player you want, and making the market even thinner for the other contenders to improve themselves.
Not really an impact player, but I like that the Jays picked up Upton to give themselves outfield depth when the Orioles were trying to get him to fill a huge hole in the outfield.
He should be fine as a 4th outfielder.

75 million dollars doesn't go too far these days.
Yeah, and he's good enough that he lets them rest their regulars without taking a huge hit to the lineup. And the Padres are paying $17 million of the $22 million he's owed between this year and next, so it's a great bargain for the Jays. I expected them to give up more than their ~20th best prospect to get him for that cheap.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

The Red Sox are in such a tough spot right now. Normally I'd be like "these asking prices are absurd lets just stand pat for better or worse" but with this being Ortiz's last year, they really need to go all in this year.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

As long as the deal doesn't involve Betts/Boagarts/Moncada I say make it.
Post Reply