As long as Star Wars and the MCU keep rolling along I'd be fine with it.BurtReynolds wrote:I'm hoping it signals the death of sequels and franchises, but I kinda doubt it.stip wrote:this seems like a pretty brutal year for blockbusters if you aren't Disney or Deadpool
Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
It just means that studios are going to start caring more about/marketing to the worldwide market. The model will change, that's all. Most of these movies do fairly well overseas/internationally.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
The race is on for the first A-list Asian superhero.
But I think the diversity is a big part of the Fast and Furious franchise's appeal. Those movies are fun for what they are, but they are utterly insipid. But it's a diverse insipidity!
But I think the diversity is a big part of the Fast and Furious franchise's appeal. Those movies are fun for what they are, but they are utterly insipid. But it's a diverse insipidity!
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 45833
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
more sucking China's dick.durdencommatyler wrote:It just means that studios are going to start caring more about/marketing to the worldwide market. The model will change, that's all. Most of these movies do fairly well overseas/internationally.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33839
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
I felt a physical, visceral reaction to this poststip wrote:As long as Star Wars and the MCU keep rolling along I'd be fine with it.BurtReynolds wrote:I'm hoping it signals the death of sequels and franchises, but I kinda doubt it.stip wrote:this seems like a pretty brutal year for blockbusters if you aren't Disney or Deadpool
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
Lets keep our fingers crossed for Rogue One. Otherwise Disney will be stuck with only 3 billion dollar movies this year.
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 45833
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I felt a physical, visceral reaction to this poststip wrote:As long as Star Wars and the MCU keep rolling along I'd be fine with it.BurtReynolds wrote:I'm hoping it signals the death of sequels and franchises, but I kinda doubt it.stip wrote:this seems like a pretty brutal year for blockbusters if you aren't Disney or Deadpool
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
stip wrote:Lets keep our fingers crossed for Rogue One. Otherwise Disney will be stuck with only 3 billion dollar movies this year.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
durdencommatyler wrote:It just means that studios are going to start caring more about/marketing to the worldwide market. The model will change, that's all. Most of these movies do fairly well overseas/internationally.
The franchise movies seem to be getting worse as they go along though. This is star treks third consecutive drop in opening weekend numbers l. Lowest of them all. And the DC and marvel movies seem to be becoming poorer quality as they go along. Marvel proliferating seems counterproductive. Do we really need Antman in a standalone movie? Or the Tick? Hardly.
Franchise fatigue is definitely setting in with audiences. It'll even happen with Star Wars eventually, thanks to the stand alones.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
The Tick isn't Marvel, and two of marvel's last three movies grossed over a billion dollars, and their most recent was one of their most critically acclaimed to boot. All these larger issues really seem to impact every group that isn't marvel. It will be interesting to see if they remain bulletproof to what does seem to be some audience fatigue. Maybe most of the summer blockbusters this year have been shitty movies, but the only one that was categorically successful was Civil War
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40176
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
The Tick tv show was awesome!
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40176
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
Uh, Marvel's latest outing, Civil War, was awesome!!! Didn't see any negative reviews on it, either.dimejinky99 wrote:And the DC and marvel movies seem to be becoming poorer quality as they go along. Marvel proliferating seems counterproductive...
If it does, I see it happening way down the line. They're being smart in that they are still giving the main storyline Episodes to go back to. The only thing I can see hurting the brand is the standalones start sucking. If they put out a couple of those that turn out to be stinkers, it'll happen sooner.dimejinky99 wrote:Franchise fatigue is definitely setting in with audiences. It'll even happen with Star Wars eventually, thanks to the stand alones.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33839
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
I see little to no evidence that franchise fatigue is affecting the general public whatsoever, at least when it comes to Marvel or Star Wars. Or Fast & Furious.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51788
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
LoathedVermin72 wrote: Or Fast & Furious.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33839
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
E.H. Ruddock wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote: Or Fast & Furious.

- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51788
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
But keep in mind as it pertains to Trek, Into Darkness made a killing internationally. It ended up being the highest grossing film in that franchise's history and it was the 14th highest grossing film of 2013 worldwide (11th in North America).dimejinky99 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:It just means that studios are going to start caring more about/marketing to the worldwide market. The model will change, that's all. Most of these movies do fairly well overseas/internationally.
The franchise movies seem to be getting worse as they go along though. This is star treks third consecutive drop in opening weekend numbers l. Lowest of them all. And the DC and marvel movies seem to be becoming poorer quality as they go along. Marvel proliferating seems counterproductive. Do we really need Antman in a standalone movie? Or the Tick? Hardly.
Franchise fatigue is definitely setting in with audiences. It'll even happen with Star Wars eventually, thanks to the stand alones.
That was my only point. Hollywood has to stop thinking of the international market as the secondary market.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
The calculations are tricky, since the return on international box office is different than in the states (I think). I know in China studios only recoup a fraction of the money
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
not that that changes your point in any way
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
No but it is worth noting, for sure. That's one out of many, many, many, many reasons why Hollywood hasn't cared much about international grosses. They've basically seen that as pure profit. Money on top of money. They make their nut back in the US and then the worldwide numbers are just caviar.
I see that changing a lot in the near future. But that will mean negotiations and new contracts and distribution deals and on and on and on. It'll be interesting to see what happens.
I see that changing a lot in the near future. But that will mean negotiations and new contracts and distribution deals and on and on and on. It'll be interesting to see what happens.