Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Post by dimejinky99 »

SS has to make something like $800 million to break even. I don't understand that if it 'only' cost $175 million to make.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45833
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Post by BurtReynolds »

If I remember correctly, Studios make a lot less per ticket on international sales than US, so international vs domestic sales revenues aren't the same.

That and marketing budgets are usually as high if not higher than the production budget. Crazy, but that's how it goes.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Post by dimejinky99 »

That makes sense I guess but SS is another great example of 10/10 marketing for a 3/10 film so what's going wrong?

'THR says the price tag for Suicide Squad was “at least $175 million” and that for the film to be a success, a studio veteran explains, “The movie’s got to do $750 million, $800 million to break even. If they get anywhere close to that, they’ll consider it a win.” That’s a lofty goal, and while the movie is tracking for a huge opening weekend, it will need to have legs to hit that mark.'
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45833
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Post by BurtReynolds »

Whatever the math, it doesn't seem like a very sustainable business model.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Post by stip »

On average a studio needs to double the cost of the movie in sales to break even. That's before marketing
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Post by dimejinky99 »

Again they should all look at what deadpool did. Made for peanuts, marketed brilliantly but made about ten times its budget.

Do more with less.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40176
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Post by wease »

dimejinky99 wrote:Again they should all look at what deadpool did. Made for peanuts, marketed brilliantly but made about ten times its budget.

Do more with less.
And it was the absolute most faithful to the comics movie that's ever been made.

(Well, that and Sin City.)
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Post by McParadigm »

durdencommatyler wrote:No but it is worth noting, for sure. That's one out of many, many, many, many reasons why Hollywood hasn't cared much about international grosses. They've basically seen that as pure profit. Money on top of money
"What? China? Nah, we don't worry about it. That's just pure profit. Like, money on top of money. Nothing a business would worry about."
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Post by epilogue »

McParadigm wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:No but it is worth noting, for sure. That's one out of many, many, many, many reasons why Hollywood hasn't cared much about international grosses. They've basically seen that as pure profit. Money on top of money
"What? China? Nah, we don't worry about it. That's just pure profit. Like, money on top of money. Nothing a business would worry about."
:?
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Post by tragabigzanda »

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 2:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Post by tragabigzanda »

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 2:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Post by epilogue »

tragabigzanda wrote:Oh! I can rank the Star Trek films I've seen:

1. Wrath of Khan
2. JJ Abrams, pt 1
:lol:
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Post by stip »

:lol:
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Post by epilogue »

I did not get the chance to see this yesterday. :|
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Post by dimejinky99 »

You'll enjoy it I think. Even if only cos it's totally unlike the previous two.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Post by epilogue »

I goddamn loved the first two, though.

But I do like the idea of the third one being different.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Post by dimejinky99 »

durdencommatyler wrote:I goddamn loved the first two, though.

But I do like the idea of the third one being different.

Oh don't get me wrong I loved/liked the first two as well. But this succeeds for me for doing something different. In that it feels like an episode. And one of the episodes that really were great. That's really why I like it and think it works.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Post by epilogue »

dimejinky99 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:I goddamn loved the first two, though.

But I do like the idea of the third one being different.

Oh don't get me wrong I loved/liked the first two as well. But this succeeds for me for doing something different. In that it feels like an episode. And one of the episodes that really were great. That's really why I like it and think it works.
:thumbsup: :thumbsup:

I need to fucking see this thing already.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

tragabigzanda wrote:Oh! I can rank the Star Trek films I've seen:

1. Wrath of Khan
2. JJ Abrams, pt 1
This is such a good post
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Post by dimejinky99 »

tragabigzanda wrote:Oh! I can rank the Star Trek films I've seen:

2. JJ Abrams, pt 1

Did you like this Star Wars movie more than his other Star Wars movie?
Calibrate your enthusiasm
Post Reply