If my Mom recognizes your face and knows your name and can name several things you've been in, you're a big enough deal to count in this conversation.dimejinky99 wrote:By the way McGregor really isn't a big entity Hollywood wise. Whereas Sam Jackson is. He didn't fit in the prequels whatsoever.
Star Wars: Episode VIII: The Last Jedi
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85155
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
dimejinky99 wrote:Ok well maybe I'm saying it wrong. But the Rock campaigning Disney to be in one and cate Blanchett saying she wants to be in one. That kinda thing is what I'm on about. I just don't think that level of Hollywood suits Star Wars.
By the way McGregor really isn't a big entity Hollywood wise. Whereas Sam Jackson is. He didn't fit in the prequels whatsoever.
Right, but your post was in direct relation to Laura Dern. Sam Jackson? For Sure. Liam Neeson or Portman? Somewhat I can see it. But we're talking about Laura Dern in a presumably not super major role. I can not imagine it would be a distraction, and I doubt her name will appear about the fold on the poster. She's a recognizable face, but hardly a star or a "draw" at this point (and probably never really was)
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85155
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Laura Dern is amazing. Her performance in Inland Empire is good, exquisite to the point of anxiety. One of the greatest performances I can remember.
But I'm also a huge fan of her work in general.
But I'm also a huge fan of her work in general.
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46239
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
She's a good actress who can disappear into her roles. No problem here.
How about that random ass Max Von Sydow part in 7? What was the point in hiring him?
Oh yeah, because he kinda looks like Alec Guinness and Abrams must always remind us of the originals.
How about that random ass Max Von Sydow part in 7? What was the point in hiring him?
Oh yeah, because he kinda looks like Alec Guinness and Abrams must always remind us of the originals.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
durdencommatyler wrote:Exactly. Sam Jackson didn't work because Sam Jackson. Not because it's Star Wars.
I would have the same concern about The Rock. But I'm open to being surprised by him, if it ever happens. Cat Blanchett should ABSOLUTELY be in a Star Wars movie. Right now! Is it too late to put in her R1? And Space Bear?
Someone said she would make a brilliant Sith Lord. I can't help but remember how WOEFULLY bad she was in that Indiana Jones film. Like horrendously bad.
Yet if she brought her A game she'd have a hard time making it different to Galadriel
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85155
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
I've seen her in a lot of work (film and theater) since LotR and I've had no problem forgetting Galadriel. I get that this is closer to that than something like Blue Jasmine but I think the point still stands.dimejinky99 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:Exactly. Sam Jackson didn't work because Sam Jackson. Not because it's Star Wars.
I would have the same concern about The Rock. But I'm open to being surprised by him, if it ever happens. Cat Blanchett should ABSOLUTELY be in a Star Wars movie. Right now! Is it too late to put in her R1? And Space Bear?
Someone said she would make a brilliant Sith Lord. I can't help but remember how WOEFULLY bad she was in that Indiana Jones film. Like horrendously bad.
Yet if she brought her A game she'd have a hard time making it different to Galadriel
She's fine in Indy 4; I'd say forgettable more than "woefully bad." It's probably the worst movie I've seen her in. Her accent is hokey. But so much of that falls on that script and Speilberg. But, yes, if that's the only thing anyone has seen her in, they probably wouldn't have much faith in her. It's her lowest point.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85155
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Yep. I'm sure that's exactly it. You nailed it.BurtReynolds wrote:She's a good actress who can disappear into her roles. No problem here.
How about that random ass Max Von Sydow part in 7? What was the point in hiring him?
Oh yeah, because he kinda looks like Alec Guinness and Abrams must always remind us of the originals.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35418
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
I met laura dern once. she stole ben harper from my conversation.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85155
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
That bitchStrat wrote:I met laura dern once. she stole ben harper from my conversation.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
durdencommatyler wrote:That bitchStrat wrote:I met laura dern once. she stole ben harper from my conversation.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
BurtReynolds wrote:She's a good actress who can disappear into her roles. No problem here.
Exactly! Turning away a good actress just because she is too recognizable seems very silly to me.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
I hope The Rock plays Darth Maul
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85155
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
That guy died, Jordan.
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35960
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I hope The Rock plays Darth Maul
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35418
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Kind of feel the same way as i wish i didnt watch it.stip wrote:thats amazing. i hope thats true and wish i didnt watch it
i also hope (as ive said before) that this trilogy starts out with ren killing han and ends with his redemption
Its actually a really great theory and would be a wonderful story. Luke having to train his biggest and most fearsome enemies grand daughter and blood line. He kind of has to train her too. Now that she has been discovered and knows the potential of her power. You either train her the best you can or you let her easily slip to the dark side and destroy the galaxy again. With lukes failures at the jedi temple with Ren.....Can make for a great internal struggle with Luke.
I like the idea of the skywalker/palpatine flip. Though, i honestly can't imagine them casting this brilliant strong woman and making her evil - You know?
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
They won't go the reincarnation route. It's too much and how do you set that up and make it work in such a way that it doesn't look hammy?
Also agree with strat. They won't flip Rey. Not after the character becoming so loved and iconic. She might be tempted by the dark side but she cant go. Also pointed out by someone that anytime we see her being aggressive or angry, is in defence of someone else, bb8 Finn and Han. It's not an anger that's overwhelming her or eating her up inside insidiously as was the case with Anakin.
Also agree with strat. They won't flip Rey. Not after the character becoming so loved and iconic. She might be tempted by the dark side but she cant go. Also pointed out by someone that anytime we see her being aggressive or angry, is in defence of someone else, bb8 Finn and Han. It's not an anger that's overwhelming her or eating her up inside insidiously as was the case with Anakin.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85155
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
I'm not going to put money on Rey turning to the dark side. But I fully expect that she will be more challenged and fall further than Luke. I'd love to see her go full big bad. But I'm not 100% sold that they'll go that route.
Ren wanting to be dark and "being seduced" by the light is super compelling to me, though. And I really hope that happens.
Ren wanting to be dark and "being seduced" by the light is super compelling to me, though. And I really hope that happens.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35418
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
I like that they can flip it on its head like this. I remember conversation about these new characters and exploring what is actually good, or what is actually evil, and that its not a black and white issue.durdencommatyler wrote:I'm not going to put money on Rey turning to the dark side. But I fully expect that she will be more challenged and fall further than Luke. I'd love to see her go full big bad. But I'm not 100% sold that they'll go that route.
Ren wanting to be dark and "being seduced" by the light is super compelling to me, though. And I really hope that happens.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85155
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Star Wars needs more ambiguity. I love that. It's the anti-Greedo shot first mentality.Strat wrote:I like that they can flip it on its head like this. I remember conversation about these new characters and exploring what is actually good, or what is actually evil, and that its not a black and white issue.durdencommatyler wrote:I'm not going to put money on Rey turning to the dark side. But I fully expect that she will be more challenged and fall further than Luke. I'd love to see her go full big bad. But I'm not 100% sold that they'll go that route.
Ren wanting to be dark and "being seduced" by the light is super compelling to me, though. And I really hope that happens.
- Greedo
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Wed December 10, 2014 6:14 pm
- Location: Basse-Terre
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
watdurdencommatyler wrote:Star Wars needs more ambiguity. I love that. It's the anti-Greedo shot first mentality.Strat wrote:I like that they can flip it on its head like this. I remember conversation about these new characters and exploring what is actually good, or what is actually evil, and that its not a black and white issue.durdencommatyler wrote:I'm not going to put money on Rey turning to the dark side. But I fully expect that she will be more challenged and fall further than Luke. I'd love to see her go full big bad. But I'm not 100% sold that they'll go that route.
Ren wanting to be dark and "being seduced" by the light is super compelling to me, though. And I really hope that happens.