10th album rumors and speculation

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Locked
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: 10th album rumors and speculation

Post by Coach »

evenslow wrote:
Coach wrote:No silly punk.
I'm down with this.

Good punk: STBC, Comatose
Silly punk: Supersonic, Big Wave
:thumbsup:
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: Pearl Jam Countdown

Post by Thejambi »

B wrote:
B wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:At least update the TSIS main page with a new screen shot of the clock every morning. :shake:
I was annoyed that they didn't make it widget that I could embed. I'll have a look later and see if I can create one. I bet a countdown widget is out there somewhere.
OK. How's that? http://www.theskyiscrape.com/

Damn thing is 3 seconds off, but there doesn't seem to be anything I can do about that.
The gap is growing. We will probably get the news before the countdown anyways so yay!
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: 10th album rumors and speculation

Post by harmless »

Mine wrote:
harmless wrote:Unlikely, but it would be nice.

I did have another thought though: what if listening to Brendan didn't kill Backspacer? What if it was just listening to Brendan's advice on how to achieve their goal ('pop' / 'new wave' or whatever)? What if he's just really good at doing what he feels is called for from record to record? What if, given a new aim for this record, Brendan does just fine and we get a nicely produced rock album?
I doubt that. Mostly because whatever was done on Backspacer wasn't done particularly well. Especially the songs that feature busier arrangements. They ruined Speed of sound by completely changing the mood of the demo and it's not like they can't build a decent arrangement layered or not. It seems that for some reason they don't seem to care enough.
That's a subjective judgment and has no bearing on how successful the band feels their attempt to emulate 'New Wave' was. Whether or not you find the album good or not, the fact is it sounded wildly different, production-wise, to anything PJ has done before. And there's a fair chance that that's because they understand the sounds of 'New Wave' to be pretty different to the sounds usually associated with PJ.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: 10th album rumors and speculation

Post by harmless »

stupidmop wrote:
harmless wrote:It's unlikely they'll listen to Brendan less*, but that would be nice.

I did have another thought though: what if listening to Brendan didn't kill Backspacer? What if it was just listening to Brendan's advice on how to achieve their goal ('pop' / 'new wave' or whatever)? What if he's just really good at doing what he feels is called for from record to record? What if, given a new aim for this record, Brendan does just fine and we get a nicely produced rock album?

*edited for clarification.
Then that's awesome. But however they were working with him on vs-yeild produced results better than backspacer. I just remembered reading that eddie wanted just breathe to be a little sparse song and brenden said 'NO we are going to make the most beautiful song EVAH' and added strings and whatever . I think i would have prefered the former but i don't think he killed the song or anything, hell it's probably their most successful song this decade so he was probably right and i should shutup.

I get what you're saying though, maybe if the band came to him with binaural first he'd have got them to do thier Spaciest song EVAH.
Mine wrote:
harmless wrote:Unlikely, but it would be nice.

I did have another thought though: what if listening to Brendan didn't kill Backspacer? What if it was just listening to Brendan's advice on how to achieve their goal ('pop' / 'new wave' or whatever)? What if he's just really good at doing what he feels is called for from record to record? What if, given a new aim for this record, Brendan does just fine and we get a nicely produced rock album?
I doubt that. Mostly because whatever was done on Backspacer wasn't done particularly well. Especially the songs that feature busier arrangements. They ruined Speed of sound by completely changing the mood of the demo and it's not like they can't build a decent arrangement layered or not. It seems that for some reason they don't seem to care enough.
I forgot about the abomination that is speed of sound. Yeah that song they did kill. Was that brenden or did eddie vomit cheese and lasers all over it himself?
Again, I'm not even talking about what they 'ruined' (your subjective judgment). I'm saying that the jarring and eclectic mishmash of musical influences which is Backspacer might well be some reflection of their intent for that album: 'New Wave'. There's no reason to expect O'Brien to do all of that production wizardry on an album with a different overall concept.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: 10th album rumors and speculation

Post by Mine »

stupidmop wrote:
harmless wrote:It's unlikely they'll listen to Brendan less*, but that would be nice.

I did have another thought though: what if listening to Brendan didn't kill Backspacer? What if it was just listening to Brendan's advice on how to achieve their goal ('pop' / 'new wave' or whatever)? What if he's just really good at doing what he feels is called for from record to record? What if, given a new aim for this record, Brendan does just fine and we get a nicely produced rock album?

*edited for clarification.
Then that's awesome. But however they were working with him on vs-yeild produced results better than backspacer. I just remembered reading that eddie wanted just breathe to be a little sparse song and brenden said 'NO we are going to make the most beautiful song EVAH' and added strings and whatever . I think i would have prefered the former but i don't think he killed the song or anything, hell it's probably their most successful song this decade so he was probably right and i should shutup.

I get what you're saying though, maybe if the band came to him with binaural first he'd have got them to do thier Spaciest song EVAH.
Mine wrote:
harmless wrote:Unlikely, but it would be nice.

I did have another thought though: what if listening to Brendan didn't kill Backspacer? What if it was just listening to Brendan's advice on how to achieve their goal ('pop' / 'new wave' or whatever)? What if he's just really good at doing what he feels is called for from record to record? What if, given a new aim for this record, Brendan does just fine and we get a nicely produced rock album?
I doubt that. Mostly because whatever was done on Backspacer wasn't done particularly well. Especially the songs that feature busier arrangements. They ruined Speed of sound by completely changing the mood of the demo and it's not like they can't build a decent arrangement layered or not. It seems that for some reason they don't seem to care enough.
I forgot about the abomination that is speed of sound. Yeah that song they did kill. Was that brenden or did eddie vomit cheese and lasers all over it himself?
It's his song, it wouldn't make sense.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: 10th album rumors and speculation

Post by harmless »

I don't know much about New Wave but I'm just picking a band at random... Blondie. I sure as hell don't like every musicianship choice they made. But I do like their songs. Same goes for The Cure. So, I dunno, to some extent that is New Wave for me. Eclectic and strange noises, ruining otherwise good rock songs. Synths, lasers, you name it.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: 10th album rumors and speculation

Post by Thejambi »

harmless wrote:I don't know much about New Wave but I'm just picking a band at random... Blondie. I sure as hell don't like every musicianship choice they made. But I do like their songs. Same goes for The Cure. So, I dunno, to some extent that is New Wave for me. Eclectic and strange noises, ruining otherwise good rock songs. Synths, lasers, you name it.
I'm with ya. they tried something and seemed like they had fun with it. I rather enjoy having the good quality acoustic demo along with the over the top version. In the end I still like Speed of Sound. I know nothing about new wave or its definition but the Backspacer version really sounds like an intentional ode to the 80's.
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
User avatar
stupidmop
Future Drummer
Posts: 2796
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:29 pm

Re: 10th album rumors and speculation

Post by stupidmop »

Mine wrote:
stupidmop wrote:
I forgot about the abomination that is speed of sound. Yeah that song they did kill. Was that brenden or did eddie vomit cheese and lasers all over it himself?
It's his song, it wouldn't make sense.
It wouldn't make sense for eddie to ruin his own song? or wouldn't make sense for eddie to let brenden ruin his song?
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: 10th album rumors and speculation

Post by harmless »

Thejambi wrote:
harmless wrote:I don't know much about New Wave but I'm just picking a band at random... Blondie. I sure as hell don't like every musicianship choice they made. But I do like their songs. Same goes for The Cure. So, I dunno, to some extent that is New Wave for me. Eclectic and strange noises, ruining otherwise good rock songs. Synths, lasers, you name it.
I'm with ya. they tried something and seemed like they had fun with it. I rather enjoy having the good quality acoustic demo along with the over the top version. In the end I still like Speed of Sound. I know nothing about new wave or its definition but the Backspacer version really sounds like an intentional ode to the 80's.
:thumbsup:

There's every chance they got into the studio and said "Well, we had our fun. Let's make a rock album now." It would be really nice if this time, we got what we were hoping for last time.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: 10th album rumors and speculation

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

Coach wrote:
stip wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
Coach wrote:No uke. No silly punk. Please. Let Stone and Jeff write the tunes. Not gonna happen....I know, but we can dream.
I wouldn't mind a more fleshed out version of Without You, Sleeping By Myself, or Light Today but not on an album. Could be a cool b-side or something.

play the uke songs can't keep and then riot act's can't keep. If you can improve a song that much with a full band version I'm on board.
Agreed that there is improvement, but I don't really enjoy either version of Can't Keep.
have you gotten the full band version live? i dont think i really liked it until it opened a show for me in 03, then in 08 when i got it again i was fully in love with the song.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35420
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: 10th album rumors and speculation

Post by Strat »

Speed of Sound is great on Backspacer.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: 10th album rumors and speculation

Post by harmless »

Strat wrote:Speed of Sound is great on Backspacer.
The only thing I don't like is 'sooooound-uuuh'.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: 10th album rumors and speculation

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

Strat wrote:Speed of Sound is great on Backspacer.
i dont know if it will ever be good to me, its just a tough one to listen to, but maybe in a couple more years ill like it
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36770
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: 10th album rumors and speculation

Post by Jorge »

why deny this drive inside just
looking for some peas
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: 10th album rumors and speculation

Post by Coach »

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
Coach wrote:
stip wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
Coach wrote:No uke. No silly punk. Please. Let Stone and Jeff write the tunes. Not gonna happen....I know, but we can dream.
I wouldn't mind a more fleshed out version of Without You, Sleeping By Myself, or Light Today but not on an album. Could be a cool b-side or something.

play the uke songs can't keep and then riot act's can't keep. If you can improve a song that much with a full band version I'm on board.
Agreed that there is improvement, but I don't really enjoy either version of Can't Keep.
have you gotten the full band version live? i dont think i really liked it until it opened a show for me in 03, then in 08 when i got it again i was fully in love with the song.
Yeah, I've seen it live, and it's difficult to judge because when I'm seeing them live, I just about love every tune because it's happening, well, live right in front of me!

I guess I fall into the category of wanting a straight up rock record. There's plenty of room for uke songs and such with their solo efforts, but Pearl Jam is best when it's rock...hard rock.
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: 10th album rumors and speculation

Post by Thejambi »

harmless wrote:
Thejambi wrote:
harmless wrote:I don't know much about New Wave but I'm just picking a band at random... Blondie. I sure as hell don't like every musicianship choice they made. But I do like their songs. Same goes for The Cure. So, I dunno, to some extent that is New Wave for me. Eclectic and strange noises, ruining otherwise good rock songs. Synths, lasers, you name it.
I'm with ya. they tried something and seemed like they had fun with it. I rather enjoy having the good quality acoustic demo along with the over the top version. In the end I still like Speed of Sound. I know nothing about new wave or its definition but the Backspacer version really sounds like an intentional ode to the 80's.
:thumbsup:

There's every chance they got into the studio and said "Well, we had our fun. Let's make a rock album now." It would be really nice if this time, we got what we were hoping for last time.
Personally I found Backspacer pretty refreshing after S/T (even though I like S/T more). It was a rather surprising approach to both the marketing and the album.
I would love a dirtier rock album for sure. Mainly I would like the music to shine through and drive the songs more than Ed. Which the past two albums Ed's pacing has seemed to smother the songs (even though I think his melodies in most cases have gotten more developed).
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: 10th album rumors and speculation

Post by Mine »

stupidmop wrote:
Mine wrote:
stupidmop wrote:
I forgot about the abomination that is speed of sound. Yeah that song they did kill. Was that brenden or did eddie vomit cheese and lasers all over it himself?
It's his song, it wouldn't make sense.
It wouldn't make sense for eddie to ruin his own song? or wouldn't make sense for eddie to let brenden ruin his song?
Depends wether it is 1995 or 2008.
User avatar
mastaflatch
AnalLog
Posts: 1183
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:05 am

Re: 10th album rumors and speculation

Post by mastaflatch »

theplatypus wrote:why deny this drive inside just
looking for some peas
:nice:
User avatar
stupidmop
Future Drummer
Posts: 2796
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:29 pm

Re: 10th album rumors and speculation

Post by stupidmop »

I appreciate that they tried to do something different, i just do not enjoy the sound of it. There's just too much going on, it's a swirling sonic mess of wtf to me.

The demo is ok though.
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: 10th album rumors and speculation

Post by EJ »

I'd rather listen to Coldplay's version.
Locked