Guardians of the Galaxy

Books, movies, television...
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84847
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by epilogue »

wease wrote:
wease wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
wease wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:I thought they confirmed there was a real Mandarin in that little short they made.
The one where Hammer is the prison bitch?
I have no idea what this means.
Sam Rockwell's character. He's in the same prison as Kingley's fake Mandarin.
And yeah, they hinted there was a real Mandarin, but that's apparently going nowhere now.
I don't know, man. I never saw the short. I just know all the folks at Collider talk about it all the time and they specifically talked about this exact thing last week and they all said there is absolutely a real Mandarin but no one knows for sure what Marvel's plans are re: the character at this point. But everyone seems pretty confident they'll reveal him eventually.

*shrugs*

I don't really care one way or another, personally.
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40175
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by wease »

Well, since there's no solo Iron Man movie anywhere on the horizon, I think it's become a dead plot point. Unless he happens to be in league with Thanos or something...
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84847
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by epilogue »

Well, again, I'm not a Marvel fan per se. I don't know/read the comics, I haven't seen all the MCU films (and I have no idea if I ever will). I have no idea what people are expecting with Thanos and Infinity War and all of that. Maybe you're point is tied into that.

But just because there's no Iron Man movie on the horizon now doesn't mean there won't be another Iron Man film. Marvel and Disney aren't just going to suddenly stop making films in the MCU. There will be another Iron Man film eventually and there's no reason why Mandarin can't be in their long term plans still. Maybe he's not. That's entirely possible, too. But I guess I don't see why it makes sense to totally write off the idea at this point.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by @SkitchP »

I also really liked IM3.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84847
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by epilogue »

@SkitchP wrote:I also really liked IM3.
:bammer:
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Joey just watch the damn movie
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84847
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by epilogue »

I will. I got sidetracked last night. And I'm at work today. I'll try to watch it tonight but I have to be up early for a race tomorrow, so I'm going to bed early. I'm off Monday. So, that should be the day.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42765
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by VinylGuy »

This movie is responsable of Chris Pratt doing the exact same character for ever.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84847
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by epilogue »

Uh. Interesting. I'll comment further once I've seen the film. But I already disagree.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42765
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by VinylGuy »

durdencommatyler wrote:Uh. Interesting. I'll comment further once I've seen the film. But I already disagree.
watch Jurassic World and that garbage i saw yesterday. Exact same character...and the trailer of Passengers looks awful with him doing smirks and one liners too.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
bart
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4133
Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 10:23 pm

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by bart »

VinylGuy wrote:This movie is responsable of Chris Pratt doing the exact same character for ever.
*Burt Macklin, FBI
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84847
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by epilogue »

VinylGuy wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Uh. Interesting. I'll comment further once I've seen the film. But I already disagree.
watch Jurassic World and that garbage i saw yesterday. Exact same character...and the trailer of Passengers looks awful with him doing smirks and one liners too.
That's because Chris Pratt has zero range.
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by bada »

Are you really interested in seeing him stretch as an actor?
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84847
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by epilogue »

bada wrote:Are you really interested in seeing him stretch as an actor?
I'm always interested in seeing good actors, yes. If there's more in him I want to see it. Why wouldn't I?
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42765
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by VinylGuy »

durdencommatyler wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Uh. Interesting. I'll comment further once I've seen the film. But I already disagree.
watch Jurassic World and that garbage i saw yesterday. Exact same character...and the trailer of Passengers looks awful with him doing smirks and one liners too.
That's because Chris Pratt has zero range.
Besides that, after this movie Hollywood wants him to be the next harrison ford or something.

Guys, stop it.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by bada »

durdencommatyler wrote:
bada wrote:Are you really interested in seeing him stretch as an actor?
I'm always interested in seeing good actors, yes. If there's more in him I want to see it. Why wouldn't I?

Well he went from the fat goofy guy to the muscular goofy guy I think that's all we should ask.
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8516
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by Mecca »

bart wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:This movie is responsable of Chris Pratt doing the exact same character for ever.
*Burt Macklin, FBI
this is your answer right here
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84847
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by epilogue »

bada wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
bada wrote:Are you really interested in seeing him stretch as an actor?
I'm always interested in seeing good actors, yes. If there's more in him I want to see it. Why wouldn't I?

Well he went from the fat goofy guy to the muscular goofy guy I think that's all we should ask.
:lol:
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

is tonight the night
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8516
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by Mecca »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:is tonight the night
It's gonna be alright
Post Reply